Skip to content

· Private foundation

Robert L Epstein Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$502k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$163k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$782kHealth$569kArts & Culture$181kHuman Services$160kReligion$150kYouth Development$127kRecreation & Sports$41kCommunity Improvement$23kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $153k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $330k
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$713k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RAYMOND F KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC$163,000
UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS - AMHERST$67,000
UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS - BOSTON$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS - HILLEL$50,000
THE WONDERFUND$35,000
UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS - AMHERST$33,000
CAPE COD HOSPITAL$25,000
TEMPLE BETH ELOHIM$25,000
JOHN F KENNEDY LIBRARY FOUNDATION$15,000
THE RASHI SCHOOL$10,000
THE WOOSTER SCHOOL$10,000
NANTUCKET COTTAGE HOSPITAL$7,000
INSIGHT THROUGH EDUCATION INC$5,000
FALMOUTH JEWISH CONGREGATION$3,500
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CAPE COD$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 37% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%NEADS: $500 → 11%THE SOUL PROJECT: $1k → 8%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER BOSTON: $3k → 8%ONE FAMILY: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
PA
CT
CA
AR
TN
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 30 repeat orgs$332k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +30% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
31

Total granted

$1.7M
$105k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+30%

Still filing today

33%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $227k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureInternationalRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WS
    WOOSTER SCHOOL CORPORATION
    6× · 2017–2024 · $145k · revenue +36%
  • TB
    THE BASEBALL INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $80k · revenue +55%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    6× · 2017–2023 · $53k · revenue +162%

Funded once

  • FR
    FAMILY REACH FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +30%
  • TA
    THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUNDgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +44%
  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR BUSINESS EQUITY INC
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -58%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
5
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
6
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
7
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
8
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

—
9
Trustees of Boston College

Mission strengthened by more than a century and a half of dedication to academic excellence, boston college commits itself to the highest standards of teaching and research in undergraduate, graduate and professional programs and to the…

Education
10
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
11
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
12
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family & Children's Service Inc; the most unlike its peers is Foundation for Business Equity Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/30
Grantees still filing
22/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS - AMHERST: $215,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS - AMHERSTCAPE COD HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $211,550 · OtherCAPE COD HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONTHE WONDERFUND: $150,000 · OtherTHE WONDERFUNDMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $146,800 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDWOOSTER SCHOOL CORPORATION: $145,000 · OtherWOOSTER SCHOOL CORPORATIONUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS - HILLEL: $110,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS - HILLELUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS: $100,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS+47 more: $444,924 · Other+47 moreRAYMOND F KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC: $163,000 · Arts & CultureRAYMOND F…COTUIT CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureCOTUIT CE…+1 more: $5,000 · Arts & CultureJOHN FITZGERALD KENNEDY LIBRARY FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $100,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS FOUNDATION INC: $36,000 · EducationBABSON COLLEGE: $11,000 · EducationTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $10,000 · EducationDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $52,800 · HealthFAMILY REACH FOUNDATION: $25,000 · HealthSILENT SPRING INSTITUTE INC: $6,000 · HealthCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $3,500 · Health+2 more: $800 · HealthTHE BASEBALL INC: $80,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $27,400 · Public Safety & DisasterJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $11,500 · Philanthropy
Other$1,523,274Arts & Culture$178,000Education$157,000Health$88,100Recreation & Sports$80,000Public Safety & Disaster$27,400Philanthropy$11,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRAYMOND F KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC: $163,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWOOSTER SCHOOL CORPORATION: $145,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetJOHN FITZGERALD KENNEDY LIBRARY FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $100,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BASEBALL INC: $80,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $52,800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS FOUNDATION INC: $36,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $27,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY REACH FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHOPEHEALTH MASSACHUSETTS INC: $21,200 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $11,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBABSON COLLEGE: $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOTUIT CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR BUSINESS EQUITY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSILENT SPRING INSTITUTE INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetINSIGHT THROUGH EDUCATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBROCKTON NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDSHIPWORKS INC: $4,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS OF GREATER BOSTON: $3,334 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALIGHT: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONE FAMILY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDAVID ORTIZ CHILDREN'S FUND: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEADS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RAYMOND F KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds WOOSTER SCHOOL CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds JOHN FITZGERALD KENNEDY LIBRARY FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds THE BASEBALL INC ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY REACH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOPEHEALTH MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds BABSON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds COTUIT CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR BUSINESS EQUITY INC ↗
  • Who funds SILENT SPRING INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds INSIGHT THROUGH EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BROCKTON NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boston Foundation IncMA24.8× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Alan D and Susan Lewis Solomont Family Foundation · Simon B Gottlieb Charitable Foundation · Paul & Phyllis Fireman Charitable Foundation · The Beker Foundation · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert L Epstein Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert L Epstein Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • The Boys & Girls Clubs of Metro South Inc: 13% of income from government
  • Silent Spring Institute Inc: 12% of income from government
  • Brockton Neighborhood Health Center Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Babson College: 3% of income from government
  • Jewish Family & Children's Service Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Neads Inc: 1% of income from government
  • The Baseball Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Cotuit Center for the Arts Inc: 1% of income from government
  • One Family Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 70 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Robert L Epstein Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph