Skip to content

· Private foundation

Robert H Dedman Jr Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$213k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$840kPhilanthropy$371kPublic Benefit$200kReligion$162kHuman Services$155kArts & Culture$53kInternational$30kRecreation & Sports$27kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $150k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$6.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BUSH PRESIDENTIAL CENTER$50,000
SEAL LEGACY FOUNDATION$50,000
SMU (VISION 2025)$50,000
HIGHLAND PARK UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$25,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
N STAR EVENTS$7,500
Individual grant recipient$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–22, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LIVING WATER INTERNATIONAL: $15k → 11%LIVING WATER INTERNATIONAL: $5k → 11%LIVING WATER INTERNATIONAL: $5k → 11%LIVING WATER INTERNATIONAL: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 14 repeat orgs$226k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
9

Total granted

$1.3M
$171k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+3%

Still filing today

57%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationReligionPublic BenefitPhilanthropyHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HS
    HOCKADAY SCHOOL
    4× · 2017–2020 · $475k · revenue +44%
  • PK
    Pi Kappa Alpha Foundation
    3× · 2017–2020 · $90k · revenue +295%
  • GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2020–2021 · $50k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • GW
    GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $30k
  • TU
    THE UNITED WAY INC
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +3%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Business Hall of Fame Foundation

To recognize the accomplishments and contributions of our outstanding Texas business leaders and to perpetuate and inspire the values of entrepreneurial spirit, personal integrity, and community leadership in all generations of Texans.

Community Improvement
2
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
3
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
4
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
5
Washburn University Foundation

The Foundation was created to assist in the promotion, development and enhancement of the financial resources for Washburn University of Topeka, as well as to receive and hold in trust any assets given in benefit of the University.

Education
6
Vanderbilt University

See Disclosure Above.

Education
7
Dallas Seminary Foundation

To support the mission of Dallas Theological Seminary by offering charitable planned giving and other related services to friends of the Seminary.

Education
8
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
9
Dallas College Foundation Inc

Dallas college foundation enhances the level of achievement and excellence of dallas college by providing scholarships, eliminating barriers that prevent students from attending and graduating, and supporting innovation.

Education
10
Smu Golf Foundation

Support men's and women's intercollegiate golf programs at SMU

Education
11
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
12
University of Southern Mississippi Foundation

To build relationships with alumni and friends in order to secure private funds and other resources for the benefit of the university of southern mississippi (usm). the foundation receives, invests and distributes private gifts in support…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc; the most unlike its peers is N-Star Events Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOCKADAY SCHOOL: $475,000 · EducationHOCKADAY SCHOOLPi Kappa Alpha Foundation: $90,000 · EducationPi Kappa Alpha FoundationTHE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION: $75,000 · EducationTHE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATIONGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITYSouthern Methodist University: $25,000 · EducationSMU (VISION 2025): $150,000 · OtherSMU (VISION 2025)BUSH PRESIDENTIAL CENTER: $150,000 · OtherBUSH PRESIDENTIAL CENTERHIGHLAND PARK UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $100,000 · OtherHIGHLAND PARK UNITED METHODIST CHURCHHIGHLAND PARK UNITED METHODIST CHUR: $50,000 · OtherHIGHLAND PARK UNITED METHODIST CHURGEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherGEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDALLAS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $40,000 · OtherDALLAS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRAIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherTHE UNITED WAY INC: $25,000 · OtherSMU PRESIDENTIAL FUND: $25,000 · Other+3 more: $17,500 · OtherCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC: $306,140 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATI…UNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC: $35,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF METROP…+1 more: $5,000 · PhilanthropySeal Legacy Foundation Inc: $50,000 · Public BenefitN-Star Events Inc: $27,000 · Public BenefitLiving Water International: $30,000 · Human ServicesRECONCILIATION OUTREACH MINISTRIES INC: $10,000 · ReligionPractice Ministries Inc: $2,000 · ReligionPhoenix Houses of Texas Inc: $1,000 · Health
Education$715,000Other$687,500Philanthropy$346,140Public Benefit$77,000Human Services$30,000Religion$12,000Health$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOCKADAY SCHOOL: $475,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC: $306,140 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPi Kappa Alpha Foundation: $90,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetTHE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSeal Legacy Foundation Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLiving Water International: $30,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetN-Star Events Inc: $27,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetTHE UNITED WAY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSouthern Methodist University: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRECONCILIATION OUTREACH MINISTRIES INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTHE DALLAS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPractice Ministries Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetPhoenix Houses of Texas Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOCKADAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds Pi Kappa Alpha Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Seal Legacy Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds Living Water International ↗
  • Who funds N-Star Events Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE UNITED WAY INC ↗
  • Who funds Southern Methodist University ↗
  • Who funds RECONCILIATION OUTREACH MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DALLAS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Practice Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds Phoenix Houses of Texas Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX12.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert H Dedman Jr Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert H Dedman Jr Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Robert H Dedman Jr Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Robert H Dedman Jr Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Robert H Dedman Jr Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph