Skip to content

· Private foundation

Robert F Ford Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$80k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$133kHealth$103kFood & Nutrition$66kPhilanthropy$35kAnimals$23kHousing & Shelter$22kCrime & Legal$20kCivil Rights$11kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$80,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$862k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VARIOUS RECIPIENTS$80,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–21, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Collabria Care: $3k → 9%Collabria Care: $3k → 9%Collabria Care: $3k → 9%Collabria Care: $2k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
MN
IL
NY
IA
RI
CA
CO
TN
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 47% of Robert F Ford Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 67% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 32%.

Robert F Ford Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$395k · 32 repeat orgs$97k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

32 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 32 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
5

Total granted

$395k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+26%

Still filing today

50%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $80k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthCrime & LegalEnvironmentHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SU
    SHAWNIGAN USA FUND
    4× · 2019–2023 · $21k · revenue +1%
  • SH
    St Helena Hospital
    6× · 2017–2022 · $15k · revenue +21%
  • EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC
    4× · 2018–2021 · $11k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • SJ
    St Jude Childrens Research
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -21%
  • EARTHJUSTICEgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +26%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
5
Western University of Health Sciences

To produce, in a humanistic tradition, health care professionals and biomedical knowledge that will enhance and extend the quality of life in our communities.

—
6
Pacific University

A diverse and sustainable learning community dedicated to discovery and excellence in teaching, scholarship and practice, pacific university inspires students to think, care, create and pursue justice in our world.

Education
7
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
8
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

—
9
University Corporation for Atmospheric Research

See schedule ouniversity corporation for atmospheric research (ucar), on behalf of, and in cooperation with its member university members, is engaged in the management of long-term atmospheric and related research and educational…

Science & Tech
10
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
11
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
12
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hazelden Betty Ford Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Ellen Fletcher Middle School Pta. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
16/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VARIOUS RECIPIENTS: $80,000 · OtherVARIOUS RECIPIENTSSonoma County Grape Growers Foundat: $48,990 · OtherSonoma County Grape Growers FoundatDarthmouth Thayer School: $38,400 · OtherDarthmouth Thayer SchoolDartmouth College Alumni Fund: $31,000 · OtherDartmouth College Alumni FundThacher School Alumni Fund: $30,000 · OtherThacher School Alumni FundRianda House: $21,500 · OtherRianda HousePlanned Parenthood: $18,060 · OtherAlzheimer Associaton: $13,545 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $12,500 · Other+17 more: $79,595 · Other+17 moreSHAWNIGAN USA FUND: $21,310 · EducationSHAWNIGAN …UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $18,600 · EducationUNIVERSITY…EASTSIDE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC: $6,640 · EducationEASTSIDE C…THE GEORGE AND BARBARA BUSH FOUNDATION: $2,240 · Education+1 more: $1,500 · EducationSONOMA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $34,750 · PhilanthropySt Helena Hospital: $15,200 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $6,840 · HealthHAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION: $3,000 · HealthEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC: $11,488 · Crime & LegalBRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE: $8,460 · Crime & LegalCOLLABRIA CARE: $10,450 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,270 · Human ServicesJameson Animal Rescue Ranch: $12,500 · Animals
Other$373,590Education$50,290Philanthropy$34,750Health$25,040Crime & Legal$19,948Human Services$12,720Animals$12,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSONOMA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $34,750 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSHAWNIGAN USA FUND: $21,310 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $18,600 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSt Helena Hospital: $15,200 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJameson Animal Rescue Ranch: $12,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC: $11,488 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLABRIA CARE: $10,450 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE: $8,460 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $6,840 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEASTSIDE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC: $6,640 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetECUMENICAL HUNGER PROGRAM: $5,920 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKQED INC: $3,160 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOUTWARD BOUND INC: $3,090 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,270 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetEllen Fletcher Middle School PTA: $1,750 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetTHE COLORADO COLLEGE: $1,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMENLO SCHOOL: $850 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SONOMA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SHAWNIGAN USA FUND ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds St Helena Hospital ↗
  • Who funds Jameson Animal Rescue Ranch ↗
  • Who funds EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds COLLABRIA CARE ↗
  • Who funds BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds EASTSIDE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds ECUMENICAL HUNGER PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds KQED INC ↗
  • Who funds OUTWARD BOUND INC ↗
  • Who funds HAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds THE GEORGE AND BARBARA BUSH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Ellen Fletcher Middle School PTA ↗
  • Who funds THE COLORADO COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds MENLO SCHOOL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN12.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert F Ford Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert F Ford Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Robert F Ford Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Robert F Ford Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Robert F Ford’s filings →

    More from the funding graph