· Private foundation
Robert D Klausner Charitable Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 80% of ROBERT D KLAUSNER CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k11 grants · $16k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $54k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FUND FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL INC | $54,000 |
| TEMPLE BETH EMET | $10,000 |
| PIONEER MIDDLE SCHOOL | $3,000 |
| PALM BEACH PBA CHARITY FUND | $2,500 |
| WBPEB | $1,950 |
| HFBA HOLLYWOOD FIRE BENEVOLENT ASSO | $1,750 |
| BALTIMORE FIRE FOUNDATION | $1,500 |
| MIRIMAR POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE | $1,000 |
| CORAL SPRINGS POLICE OFFCERS FOUND | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| TOUCHED BY TYPE 1 | $1,000 |
| TROUP 3234323 INC | $500 |
| BEYOND DIFFERENCES | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against -6% for the ones you funded once.
17 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 18% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $65k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LCLEV CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC2× · 2019–2021 · $10k · revenue +304%
- TPTAMPA POLICE BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION INC2× · 2020–2021 · $3k · revenue +74%
- TFTAMPA FIREFIGHTERS CHARITY FUND INC3× · 2017–2020 · $3k · revenue +22%
Funded once
- JCJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS OF SOUTH BROWARD INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $6k · revenue +134%
- MJMIAMI JEWISH HEALTH SYSTEMS INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +39%
- GRGEORGE RODRIGUE FOUNDATION OF THE ARTS INCone grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -67%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To represent police officers in connection with labor/management affairs.
The police and kids foundation was created to support families of florida 1st responders who die in the line of duty, provide equipment grants t o1st responders and to support children of tampa bay.
Brief description of the organization's mission the purpose of the fund is to provide assistance to the families of new york city police officers and firefighters who have been killed in the line of duty. after the events of september 11,…
Fpca's mission is to continuously enhance law enforcement by providing a unified voice for police chiefs statewide and nationally, serving as the public face of law enforcement executive leadership, and providing a forum for executive…
To provide financial assistance to the families of police officers in need.
The organization seeks to honor law enforcement officers killed in the line of duty through maintenance of a memorial monument at the state capitol.
To promote professionalism in law enforcement. to provide labor & collective bargaining services, legal assistance, education, legistlative representation and death and disability benefits to palm beach county police officers.
The national association of police organizations (napo) was established to unite all law enforcement organizations within the united states in order to promote and maintain federal legislation and policies most beneficial to law…
To provide support for the families of law enforcement officers killed in the line of duty and to provide support to law enforcement officers' who are disabled in the line of duty by the felonious act of another and to provide assistance…
Afp&cc's mission is to support & promote the law enforcement profession by assisting family members of slain officers through programs of compassion, by assisting in the perpetuation of the american police hall of fame & museum, & by…
The boca raton police foundation mission is to back boca's finest by funding the latest technology and training to enhance the safety of our community. the foundation will enact its mission through providing supplementary funding for the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feeding South Florida Inc and the most unlike its peers is George Rodrigue Foundation of the Arts Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE FUND FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC ↗
- Who funds FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds LEV CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS OF SOUTH BROWARD INC ↗
- Who funds MIAMI JEWISH HEALTH SYSTEMS INC ↗
- Who funds GEORGE RODRIGUE FOUNDATION OF THE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds MIRAMAR POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds TAMPA POLICE BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds TAMPA FIREFIGHTERS CHARITY FUND INC ↗
- Who funds West Broward Performance Ensemble Boosters Inc ↗
- Who funds TOUCHED BY TYPE 1 INC ↗
- Who funds PTA Griffin Elementary Inc ↗
- Who funds Police Athletic League of Jacksonville Inc ↗
- Who funds BROWARD COUNTY COUNCIL OF PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTER ↗
- Who funds THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Robert D Klausner Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Jewish Community Centers of South Broward Inc — 8% of income from government
- Feeding South Florida Inc — 5% of income from government
- Jack and Jill Children's Center Inc — 2% of income from government
- Feed the Children Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Robert D Klausner Charitable Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Robert D Klausner Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.