Skip to content
Robert and Nathalie Corry Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Robert and Nathalie Corry Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$193k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Health$95kPhilanthropy$78kArts & Culture$23kInternational$11kHuman Services$8kPublic Safety & Disaster$8kEducation$4kFood & Nutrition$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k23 grants · $58k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $85k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$2,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CITY OF HOPE$50,000
MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$35,000
THE LEUKEMIA AND LYMPHOMA SOCIETY - DARE TO DREAM$30,000
NPRSO CAL PUBLIC RADIO$20,000
DKMS$7,500
PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES$5,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$5,000
THE LEUKEMIA AND LYMPHOMA SOCIETY SVOY$5,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$5,000
THE CROHN'S AND COLITIS FOUNDATION$3,500
UNICEF USA$2,500
THE HELP GROUP$2,500
NMDP FOUNDATION$2,500
PCCHCHLA$2,500
DESERT SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%FOOD ON FOOT: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

43%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$100k · 6 repeat orgs$131k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
2

Total granted

$100k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+12%

Still filing today

67%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 33% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $129k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
HealthInternationalHuman ServicesArts & CultureEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    CITY OF HOPE
    2× · 2024–2025 · $75k
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES
    2× · 2024–2025 · $10k · revenue +3%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $8k · revenue 0%

Funded once

  • FO
    FOOD ON FOOT
    one grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue 0%
  • AC
    ANGELES CHORALE
    one grant, 2024 · $250 · revenue +12%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
2
Direct Relief

Direct relief is a humanitarian aid organization, active in all 50 states and more than 80 countries, with a mission to improve the health and lives of people affected by poverty or emergencies - without regard to politics, religion, or…

International
3
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
4
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
5
Usc Health System

The Corporation is a nonprofit public benefit corporation and is not organized for the private gain of any person. It is organized under the Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation Law for public and charitable purposes. The Corporation is…

Health
6
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
7
Usc Arcadia Hospital Foundation

Mission statement the mission of usc arcadia hospital foundation educates and inspires the community to generously support quality medical care at usc arcadia hospital.

Health
8
Ucsf Health Medical Foundation

See schedule othe mission of ucsf health medical foundation is threefold: 1) to establish, operate and maintain medical clinics for the provision of healthcare services in california; 2) to promote health by providing, coordinating,…

Health
9
The Jonsson Cancer Center Foundation

The jonsson cancer center foundation is the single most important vehicle for raising private funds for cancer research at ucla and plays a key role in advancing cancer treatments and care. please see schedule o for additional information.

—
10
Children's Dental Foundation

To deliver oral health education and comprehensive treatment for economically disadvantaged children, including those with complex medical considerations, while also providing premier training in pediatric and multi-specialty dentistry.

Health
11
Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Promotion and advancement of children's health through patient care, research, and education.

Health
12
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Memorial Medical Center Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Amahoro International Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
8/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF HOPE: $75,000 · OtherCITY OF HOPETHE LEUKEMIA AND LYMPHOMA SOCIETY - DARE TO DREAM: $30,000 · OtherTHE LEUKEMIA AND LYMPHOMA SOCIETY - DARE TO DREAMNPRSO CAL PUBLIC RADIO: $20,000 · OtherNPRSO CAL PUBLIC RADIOTHE LEUKEMIA AND LYMPHOMA SOCIETY SVOY: $5,000 · Other+6 more: $11,400 · Other+6 moreMEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $35,000 · HealthMEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUN…PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES: $10,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGEL…DKMS: $7,500 · HealthDKMSCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $3,500 · HealthCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION…+1 more: $1,000 · HealthMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $7,500 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $2,500 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $2,500 · InternationalAMAHORO INTERNATIONAL INC: $500 · InternationalAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,000 · Human ServicesSECURE BEGINNINGS: $3,000 · Human ServicesFOOD ON FOOT: $1,500 · Human ServicesDESERT SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $2,500 · EducationPENINSULA LIBRARY FRIENDS FOUNDATION: $1,250 · EducationNMDP FOUNDATION: $2,500 · PhilanthropyPalos Verdes Art Center Beverly G Alpay Center for Arts Education: $1,250 · Arts & CultureNO LIMITS THEATER GROUP INC: $500 · Arts & CultureANGELES CHORALE: $250 · Arts & CultureYOSEMITE FOUNDATION: $1,500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$141,400Health$57,000International$13,000Human Services$9,500Education$3,750Philanthropy$2,500Arts & Culture$2,000Recreation & Sports$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSECURE BEGINNINGS: $3,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNMDP FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOSEMITE FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD ON FOOT: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPalos Verdes Art Center Beverly G Alpay Center for Arts Education: $1,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPENINSULA LIBRARY FRIENDS FOUNDATION: $1,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetManes for Movement Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetANGELES CHORALE: $250 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community …The Kenneth T and Eil…Morgan Stanley Global…American Online Givin…National Philanthropi…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
California Community FoundationCA14.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · The Kenneth T and Eileen L Norris Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert and Nathalie Corry Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert and Nathalie Corry Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Robert and Nathalie Corry Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home