Skip to content

· Private foundation

Robert a Parman Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$146k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$715kHuman Services$245kHousing & Shelter$140kFood & Nutrition$90kEmployment$85kArts & Culture$30kHealth$8kReligion$100
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $135k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$40,000
OKLAHOMA CITY UNIVERSITY$20,000
UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA$20,000
CITY RESCUE MISSION$15,000
EDMOND FAMILY COUNSELING$10,000
WORK ACTIVITY CENTER INC$10,000
UPWARD TRANSITIONS INC$10,000
REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA$10,000
WHIZ KIDS OF OKLAHOMA$5,000
CENTRAL OKLAHOMA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$5,000
STEPHENSON CANCER CENTER$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $225k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $15k → 16%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $15k → 16%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $15k → 16%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $15k → 16%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $15k → 16%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $15k → 16%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $15k → 16%CITY CARE INC: $10k → 16%CITY CARE INC: $10k → 16%CITY CARE INC: $10k → 16%CITY CARE INC: $10k → 16%CITY CARE INC: $10k → 16%CITY CARE INC: $10k → 16%EDMOND FAMILY COUNSELING: $10k → 16%EDMOND FAMILY COUNSELING INC: $10k → 16%EDMOND FAMILY COUNSELING INC: $10k → 16%EDMOND FAMILY COUNSELING INC: $10k → 16%EDMOND FAMILY COUNSELING INC: $10k → 16%EDMOND FAMILY COUNSELING INC: $5k → 16%EDMOND FAMILY COUNSELING INC: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 15 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
2

Total granted

$1.3M
$5k

Still filing today

67%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionEmploymentHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OS
    Oklahoma State University Foundation
    7× · 2019–2025 · $350k · revenue +90%
  • CITY RESCUE MISSION INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $105k · revenue +137%
  • OC
    OKLAHOMA CITY UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2019–2025 · $95k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • F7
    FAITH 7 WORK ACTIVITY CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • NC
    NEW COVENANT UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $100
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oklahoma City Housing Services Redevelopment Corporation

To revitalize urban oklahoma city neighborhoods and create affordable housing opportunities by rehabilitating historic homes, constructing new homes, and increasing community investment through home ownership.

Housing & Shelter
2
Urban League of Greater Oklahoma City Inc

The urban league of greater oklahoma city's (ulokc) mission is to assist african americans, other minorities, and the poor to achieve social and economic equality. its core mission is focused on education and economic mobility through…

Human Services
3
United Way of Central Oklahoma Inc

United way of central oklahoma is committed to connecting people and resources to improve the well being of those in our community.

Philanthropy
4
Family Hope House Inc

Family Hope House empowers families through therapy, education, and advocacy. As Oklahoma's sole adoption competent mental health agency, we support foster and adoptive children for lasting stability and success.

Health
5
Community Action Agency of Oklahoma City & Oklahoma/Canadian Counties

To promote the self-sufficiency of the socially, economically, and culturally disadvantaged citizens of oklahoma and canadian counties and to eliminate the paradox of poverty among these citizens by opening to everyone the opportunity to…

Human Services
6
Oklahoma City Beautiful Inc

OKC Beautiful's mission is to lead beautification and environmental stewardship through collaboration, education and advocacy. We have been doing this for over 50 years through volunteers and contributing donors. This directly impacts the…

Environment
7
Oklahoma Association of Community Action

To alleviate the causes of poverty by supporting oklahoma's community action agencies, which includes providing coordinated services, training and other assitance to member agencies.

Human Services
8
The Urban Mission Inc

The organization provides emergency social and educational services to families in central oklahoma.

—
9
Family Crisis Center Inc

The family crisis center provides intervention and advocacy for victims of sexual assault and domestic violence. this is done with counselors, court advocates and 24 hour shelter for victims and their children.

Human Services
10
Oklahoma State Chamber of Commerce and Industry Inc

The State Chamber is a statewide membership organization. Our purpose is to be the unified voice of business and the most effective advocacy organization at the State Capitol.

—
11
Young Womens Christian Association of Oklahoma Ci

Ywca oklahoma city is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women and promoting peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all

Human Services
12
Oklahoma Community Service Commission Inc

The mission of the oklahoma community service commission is to engage oklahomans of all ages and backgrounds in community-based service which supports americorps programs in oklahoma communities. services may include assisting with…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is City Care Inc; the most unlike its peers is Work Activity Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Oklahoma State University Foundation: $350,000 · EducationOklahoma State University FoundationOKLAHOMA CITY UNIVERSITY: $95,000 · EducationOKLAHOMA CITY UNIVERSITYRAINBOW FLEET INC: $35,000 · EducationRAINBOW FLEET INC+1 more: $5,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA: $190,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMAOKLAHOMA CITY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $75,000 · OtherOKLAHOMA CITY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIO…UPWARD TRANSITIONS INC: $60,000 · OtherUPWARD TRANSITIONS INCARTS COUNCIL OF OKC: $30,000 · OtherARTS COUNCIL OF OKCSALVATION ARMY: $30,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY+4 more: $13,100 · OtherCITY RESCUE MISSION INC: $105,000 · Human ServicesCITY RESCUE MISSION…Edmond Family Counseling Inc: $60,000 · Human ServicesEdmond Family Couns…CITY CARE INC: $60,000 · Human ServicesCITY CARE INCREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC: $90,000 · Food & NutritionWork Activity Center Inc: $80,000 · EmploymentCENTRAL OKLAHOMA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $35,000 · Housing & Shelter
Education$485,000Other$398,100Human Services$225,000Food & Nutrition$90,000Employment$80,000Housing & Shelter$35,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOklahoma State University Foundation: $350,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCITY RESCUE MISSION INC: $105,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetOKLAHOMA CITY UNIVERSITY: $95,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC: $90,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWork Activity Center Inc: $80,000 over 7y, 7.5% of budgetEdmond Family Counseling Inc: $60,000 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetCITY CARE INC: $60,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetUPWARD TRANSITIONS INC: $60,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetCENTRAL OKLAHOMA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $35,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetRAINBOW FLEET INC: $35,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetWhiz Kids of Oklahoma Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Oklahoma State University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CITY RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA CITY UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds Work Activity Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds Edmond Family Counseling Inc ↗
  • Who funds CITY CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds UPWARD TRANSITIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL OKLAHOMA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds RAINBOW FLEET INC ↗
  • Who funds Whiz Kids of Oklahoma Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oklahoma City Community Foundation IncOK17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Inasmuch Foundation · Lemon Family Foundation · Fred Jones Family Foundation · Kirkpatrick Family Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert a Parman Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert a Parman Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Robert a Parman’s filings →

    More from the funding graph