Skip to content
Rnr Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Rnr Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$485k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$133k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$781kYouth Development$499kHousing & Shelter$409kPhilanthropy$325kHuman Services$190kRecreation & Sports$100kEnvironment$86kFood & Nutrition$75kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $47k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $433k
$75,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CASS COMMUNITY SOCIAL SERVICES$133,000
ROLLINS COLLEGE$100,000
SILVER KEY$75,000
GIRLS GROUP OF ANN ARBOR$75,000
HOPE HORSES AND KIDS$50,000
PIKES PEAK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$25,000
NEUTRAL ZONE$22,000
PIKES PEAK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $190k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%SILVER KEY: $75k → 9%SILVER KEY: $75k → 9%SILVER KEY: $40k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 11 repeat orgs$154k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
5

Total granted

$2.3M
$154k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+54%

Still filing today

73%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RC
    ROLLINS COLLEGE
    5× · 2021–2025 · $653k · revenue +37%
  • CC
    CASS COMMUNITY SOCIAL SERVICES INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $290k · revenue +21%
  • SILVER KEY SENIOR SERVICES INC
    3× · 2021–2025 · $190k · revenue +66%

Funded once

  • CH
    Community Homeless Solutionsgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $59k · revenue +72%
  • HL
    HELM LIFE CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $40k
  • HF
    HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEMgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +33%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
2
Summit Community Care Clinic Inc

Provide exceptional, integrated, patient-centered health care services designed to meet the needs of all patients, particularly those who experience barriers to accessing care, regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
3
Set of Colorado Springs

S.e.t. of colorado springs is made up of a small multi-skilled staff and a large corps of volunteers, including many in the medical professions. s.e.t. of colorado springs collaborates with other care-givers in the pikes peak area to teach…

—
4
Comprehensive Community Solutions Inc

To bring about fundamental transformation of neighborhoods, communities, and circumstances of those who live there, through programs and services which emphasize building human capital, communities and affordable housing.

Human Services
5
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
6
Counselors of Real Estate

Cre was established exclusively for real estate advisors who provide intelligent, unbiased, and trusted advice for a client or employer. the purpose of the organization is to serve as an information resource and to provide its members with…

Community Improvement
7
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
8
Community Affordable Residences Enterprise Inc

To create an equitable and just community through high quality affordable housing and transformative resident services. We envision a community where an affordable home is available to everyone.

Housing & Shelter
9
NeighborWorks Housing Services of Pueblo Inc

Our mission is to promote healthy, vibrant neighborhoods and serve as a first choice for homebuyer resources in Southern Colorado. We have four pillars: educate, build, lend, and engage, that guide us in everything we do. Our HUD-certified…

Housing & Shelter
10
Energize Colorado Inc

We foster resiliency in underinvested business communities across colorado by innovatively addressing capital gaps. at energize colorado, we envision a future where we are the go-to destination for business owners seeking comprehensive…

Community Improvement
11
Central Columbia Senior Living

To develop, own, lease and manage assisted living facilities, retirement apartments, boarding homes and similar undertakings intended to care for aged and infirm residents.

Housing & Shelter
12
National Housing Conference Inc

The national housing conference has been defending the american home since 1931. we believe everyone in america should have equal opportunity to live in a quality, affordable home in a thriving community. nhc convenes and collaborates with…

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pikes Peak Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Innovations in Aging Collaborative. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GIRLS GROUP OF ANN ARBOR: $355,000 · OtherGIRLS GROUP OF ANN ARBORANN ARBOR COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $313,105 · OtherANN ARBOR COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONCASS COMMUNITY SOCIAL SERVICES INC: $290,000 · OtherCASS COMMUNITY SOCIAL SERVICES INCIndividual grant recipient: $75,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCommunity Homeless Solutions: $59,000 · Other+5 more: $125,000 · Other+5 moreROLLINS COLLEGE: $652,859 · EducationROLLINS COLLEGETERREFORM ONE CORPORATION: $66,200 · EducationTERREFORM ONE CORPORATIONSILVER KEY SENIOR SERVICES INC: $190,000 · Human ServicesNeutral Zone: $144,357 · Youth DevelopmentPIKES PEAK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $100,000 · PhilanthropyHOPE HORSES & KIDS: $100,000 · Recreation & SportsFOOD TO POWER (FKA COLORADO SPRINGS FOOD RESCUE): $75,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,217,105Education$719,059Human Services$190,000Youth Development$144,357Philanthropy$100,000Recreation & Sports$100,000Food & Nutrition$75,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetROLLINS COLLEGE: $652,859 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCASS COMMUNITY SOCIAL SERVICES INC: $290,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetSILVER KEY SENIOR SERVICES INC: $190,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetNeutral Zone: $144,357 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetPIKES PEAK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetHOPE HORSES & KIDS: $100,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetFOOD TO POWER (FKA COLORADO SPRINGS FOOD RESCUE): $75,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetTERREFORM ONE CORPORATION: $66,200 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetCommunity Homeless Solutions: $59,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetInnovations in Aging Collaborative: $30,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTIP OF THE MITT WATERSHED COUNCIL: $20,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetGRECCIO HOUSING UNLIMITED INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Myron Stratton Ho…The Joseph Henry Edmo…Ent Credit UnionColorado Springs Heal…Pikes Peak Community …El Pomar FoundationThe Colorado Health F…Natl Christian Charit…The Bank of America C…National Philanthropi…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…
The Myron Stratton HomeCO15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Myron Stratton Home · The Joseph Henry Edmondson Foundation · Ent Credit Union · Colorado Springs Health Foundation · Pikes Peak Community Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rnr Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rnr Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Rollins College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Rnr Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Rnr Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rnr Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home