Skip to content
Riverside Medical Center at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Riverside Medical Center

RIVERSIDE MEDICAL CENTER is committed to improving the well-being of the communities it serves, regardless of an individual's ability to pay.

$183k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$32k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$316kHealth$104kCommunity Improvement$81kArts & Culture$19kInternational$8kPhilanthropy$6kReligion$5k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $110,975, the rows itemized in this filing. The $183,215 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $72,240 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $97k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$834M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OLIVET NAZARENE UNIVERSITY$32,000
BISHOP MCNAMARA HS$30,000
KANKAKEE RIVERFRONT SOCIETY$25,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$10,000
KANKAKEE CITY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$8,475
KANKAKEE COUNTY HEALTH DEPT$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $10k → 13%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $15k → 14%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $10k → 14%THE US UKRAINE FOUNDATION: $8k → 6%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $10k → 13%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $14k → 14%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $10k → 14%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $13k → 14%American Cancer Society: $12k → 14%Life Compass Church: $5k → 14%Bishop Mcnamara High School: $30k → 14%BISHOP MCNAMARA HS: $30k → 14%KANKAKEE RIVERFRONT SOCIETY: $25k → 14%KANKAKEE RIVERFRONT SOCIETY: $25k → 14%KANKAKEE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $25k → 14%BISHOP MCNAMARA HIGH SCHOOL: $15k → 14%BISHOP MCNAMARA HIGH SCHOOL: $15k → 14%Bishop McNamara High School: $15k → 14%BISHOP MCNAMARA CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $15k → 14%KANKAKEE CTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $10k → 14%KANKAKEE CITY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $8k → 14%KANKAKEE VALLEY SYMPHONY: $8k → 14%KANKAKEE CTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $6k → 14%KANKAKEE CITY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $6k → 14%KANKAKEE EVENTS PARTNERSHIP: $6k → 14%UNITED WAY OF KANKAKEE & IROQUOIS COUNTY: $6k → 14%KANKAKEE VALLEY SYMPHONY: $6k → 14%KANKAKEE COUNTY HEALTH DEPT: $6k → 14%Kankakee Community College Foundation: $5k → 14%Olivet Nazarene University: $57k → 14%OLIVET NAZARENE UNIVERSITY: $50k → 14%OLIVET NAZARENE UNIVERSITY: $32k → 14%OLIVET NAZARENE UNIVERSITY: $27k → 14%Hospice of Kankakee Valley: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$488k · 8 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +16% since the first grant, against -33% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
6

Total granted

$488k
$44k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
-33%

Still filing today

75%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationCommunity ImprovementHealthInternationalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ON
    OLIVET NAZARENE UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2021–2024 · $166k · revenue +3%
  • KC
    Kankakee County Chamber of Commerce
    4× · 2021–2024 · $31k · revenue +19%
  • KC
    KANKAKEE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $30k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • BM
    BISHOP MCNAMARA HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • US
    U S-UKRAINE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $8k · revenue -77%
  • CO
    CITY OF KANKAKEE
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kankakee County Convention & Visitors Bureau

Promote tourism in kankakee county (il)

—
2
Kishwaukee United Way

To improve lives by sharing community resources

Philanthropy
3
Kane Community Hospital Foundation

Kane community hospital foundation supports the people of upmc kane and their communities by providing access to financial resources to be used towards education and services aimed to enhance health and wellness within our region

Health
4
Kankakee County Historical Society

Historical society museum for the purpose of collecting, exhibiting and interpreting the material culture of kankakee county, illinois.

Arts & Culture
5
Kalispell Area Chamber of Commerce

Economic and community development

—
6
Economic Alliance of Kankakee County Inc

The Organization delivers services and activities to encourage and foster economic development in Kankakee County. The director and staff of the Organization are employees of Kankakee County. The salaries & related benefits costs are…

Community Improvement
7
Wright in Kankakee

To advance and preserve the frank lloyd wright campus in kankakee, il

Arts & Culture
8
Kenosha Community Foundation

We lead, serve and collaborate with donors to create enduring philanthropy.

Philanthropy
9
Kane Area Industrial Development Corporation

To assist in the recruitment of new business and industry and to work with existing business and industry to retain present levels and provide for future growth.

—
10
Kankakee County Humane Society Inc

Care and shelter program for the adoption of animals

Animals
11
Kankakee County Coalition Against Domestic Violence Inc

Providing assistance to victims of domestic violence

Human Services
12
Blackhawk Waterways Cvb

Promote tourism in nw illinois

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Kankakee County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Kankakee Riverfront Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BISHOP MCNAMARA CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $105,000 · OtherBISHOP MCNAMARA CATHOLIC SCHOOLAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $53,300 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETYBISHOP MCNAMARA HIGH SCHOOL: $15,000 · OtherBISHOP MCNAMARA HIGH SCHOOLKANKAKEE VALLEY SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION: $13,000 · OtherKANKAKEE VALLEY SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIAT…+4 more: $21,500 · Other+4 moreOLIVET NAZARENE UNIVERSITY: $166,000 · EducationOLIVET NAZARENE UNIVERSITYKANKAKEE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $30,000 · EducationKANKAKEE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATIONKankakee Riverfront Society Inc: $50,000 · Community ImprovementKankakee Riverfro…Kankakee County Chamber of Commerce: $31,164 · Community ImprovementKankakee County C…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $40,000 · HealthU S-UKRAINE FOUNDATION: $7,634 · InternationalUNITED WAY OF KANKAKEE COUNTY INC: $5,825 · Philanthropy
Other$207,800Education$196,000Community Improvement$81,164Health$40,000International$7,634Philanthropy$5,825

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOLIVET NAZARENE UNIVERSITY: $166,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKankakee Riverfront Society Inc: $50,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKankakee County Chamber of Commerce: $31,164 over 4y, 5.3% of budgetKANKAKEE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetKANKAKEE VALLEY SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION: $13,000 over 2y, 6.7% of budgetU S-UKRAINE FOUNDATION: $7,634 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHospice of Kankakee Valley Inc DBA UpliftedCare: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Presence Central and …Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Presence Central and Suburban Hospitals NetworkMO13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Presence Central and Suburban Hospitals Network · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Riverside Medical Center funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Riverside Medical Center. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Riverside Medical Center?

    Find your warmest path to Riverside Medical Center through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Riverside Medical Center’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home