· Public charity
Presence Central and Suburban Hospitals Network
Rooted in the loving ministry of jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $20k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $116k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
- $250k+1 grant · $43M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Catholic Health Foundation of Northern Illinois | $42,544,122 |
| WILL-GRUNDY MEDICAL CLINIC | $50,000 |
| Catholic Bishop of Chicago | $48,456 |
| ADVOCATIA SOLUTIONS INC | $37,080 |
| WAUBONSEE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| DOWNTOWN NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION OF ELGIN | $10,000 |
| KANKAKEE RIVERFRONT SOCIETY INC | $10,000 |
| BISHOP MCNAMARA CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL | $7,500 |
| NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK | $6,375 |
| WE STAND FOR CHRIST JESUS MINISTRIES | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +58% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.
13 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $43M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CFCENTER FOR INFORMATION OF ELGIN (CENTRO DE INFORMACION)5× · 2019–2023 · $753k · revenue +448%
- WGWILL GRUNDY MEDICAL CLINIC8× · 2017–2025 · $349k · revenue +463%
- YMYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION JOLIET3× · 2020–2022 · $283k · revenue +145%
Funded once
- PHPROMISE HEALTHCARE NFPgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $23k · revenue +125%
- WCWILL COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCEone grant, 2023 · $16k · revenue -9%
- ACALIGNMENT COLLABORATIVE FOR EDUCATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $16k · revenue +914%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To improve lives by sharing community resources
To be a voice for business and a forum for the exchange of ideas and through a variety of chamber programs and services, strengthen the economic vitality of east chicago, hammond, and northwest indiana.
To promote the economic health of mchenry county, il through retention, expansion and attraction of commerce and industry which is conducive to an optimal quality of life for its citizen
Strengthen companies in the kinzie industrial corridor and facilitate economic and community development by providing services and incubator space.
Naperville chamber of commerce ("nacc") began operations in 1913 and is incorporated under the general not-for-profit corporation act of the state of illinois. the naperville area chamber of commerce has one goal and that is to move…
To improve lives by mobilizing the caring power of communities around the world to advance the common good.
Commonwealth credit union, building lifelong relationships one member at a time.
The Elgin Area Chamber connects communities through engagement, advocacy, collaboration, and leadership.
Chamber of commerce to support, ancourage and engage in activities that make the greater Beloit area a better place to live and do business.
Economic development within champaign county, il and surrounding communities
Promote the health and independence of lake county, il, older adults
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Will County and the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CATHOLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR INFORMATION OF ELGIN (CENTRO DE INFORMACION) ↗
- Who funds WILL GRUNDY MEDICAL CLINIC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION JOLIET ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF KANKAKEE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds OLIVET NAZARENE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF WILL COUNTY ↗
- Who funds DOWNTOWN NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOC OF ELGIN ↗
- Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
- Who funds Kankakee Riverfront Society Inc ↗
- Who funds PROMISE HEALTHCARE NFP ↗
- Who funds WILL COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds ALIGNMENT COLLABORATIVE FOR EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds SENIOR SERVICES CENTER OF WILL COUNTY ↗
- Who funds FOX VALLEY HANDS OF HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF JOLIET ↗
- Who funds WAUBONSEE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KANKAKEE COUNTY CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU ↗
- Who funds Kankakee County Chamber of Commerce ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Riverside Medical Center · Midland States Bank Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · AbbVie Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Presence Central and Suburban Hospitals Network funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.