Skip to content
Riverside Community Health Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Riverside Community Health Foundation

To improve the health and well being of the community by providing health education and outreach programs as well as grants to non-profit organizations, schools, and government agencies.

$598k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$538k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$5.0MHealth$2.3MEducation$628kHousing & Shelter$472kRecreation & Sports$41kYouth Development$11kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $60k
  • $250k+1 grant · $538k
$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$109M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION$537,542
RIVERISDE AREA RAPE CRISIS CENTER$30,000
A COMING OF AGE TO ADULTHOOD INC$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $5.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WALDEN FAMILY SERVICES: $45k → 11%WALDEN FAMILY SERVICES: $30k → 11%WALDEN FAMILY SERVICES: $30k → 11%WALDEN FAMILY SERVICES: $20k → 11%COMMUNITY ACCESS CENTER: $8k → 11%OPERATION SAFE HOUSE INC: $10k → 11%COMMUNITY SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION: $982k → 11%COMMUNITY SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION: $738k → 11%COMMUNITY SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION: $730k → 11%COMMUNITY SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION: $624k → 11%COMMUNITY SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION: $567k → 11%COMMUNITY SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION: $538k → 11%COMMUNITY SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION: $526k → 11%COMMUNITY SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION: $69k → 11%JANET GOESKE FOUNDATION: $25k → 11%JANET GOESKE FOUNDATION: $25k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.2M · 17 repeat orgs$447k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +72% since the first grant, against +38% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
14

Total granted

$8.2M
$387k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
+38%

Still filing today

82%
79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesReligionYouth DevelopmentPublic Safety & DisasterEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    COMMUNITY SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION OF RIVERSIDE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $4.8M · revenue +16% · 80% of their budget
  • LL
    LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2023 · $789k · revenue +8%
  • PO
    PATH OF LIFE MINISTRIES
    2× · 2018–2019 · $472k · revenue +74%

Funded once

  • RO
    REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
    one grant, 2020 · $88k
  • FS
    FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $49k · revenue +38%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Incgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $39k · revenue +26%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Transitionsmental Health Association

Transitions - mental health association is a nonprofit organization dedicated to eliminating stigma and promoting recovery and wellness for people with mental illness through work, housing, community and family support services.

Unclassified
2
Laguna Beach Community Clinic

The mission of laguna beach community clinic (lbcc) is to provide excellent medical care regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Health
3
Asian Pacific Health Care Venture Inc

Asian Pacific Health Care Venture, Inc. is a family of community health centers whose mission is to be the medical home for our patients by providing personalized, quality health care services in a culturally accessible manner.

—
4
Human Services Association

The principal mission of Human Services Association is to provide families with compassionate and comprehensive care to promote wellness and build strong communities.

Human Services
5
South Peninsula Behavioral Health Services Inc

The organization operates primarily on the Southern Kenai Peninsula and its operations include the following:Community Mental Health - Counseling, evaluation, consultation and crisis mental health services for Adults and…

Health
6
Consejo Counseling & Referral Service

Consejo brings healing, health, and hope to communities through holistic, culturally, and linguistically competent behavioral health services and advocacy.

Health
7
Community Medical Centers Inc

The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.

Health
8
Asian Health Services

Asian Health Services (AHS) provides a continuum of medical care, mental health care, dental care and other healthcare services for all, including health education; perinatal services; behavioral health; family and youth services;…

Health
9
The Children's Clinic 'Serving Children and Their Families'

TCC Family Health mission is to provide innovative, integrated, quality health care that will contribute to a healthy community, focusing on those in need and working with patients and the community as partners in their overall well-being.

—
10
Community Health Association Inland Southern Region

We exist to support our membership and community parnters to ensure acessible high-quality, and cost-effictve health services.

—
11
Planned Parenthood California Central Coast

To improve our communities' sexual and reproductive health outcomes through health care, education, and advocacy.

Health
12
Family Care Network Inc

The mission of the Family Care Network is to enhance the wellbeing of children, adults, and families in partnership with our community.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Olive Crest; the most unlike its peers is Empower You Edutainment. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
21/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION OF RIVERSIDE: $4,773,129 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION OF RIVERSIDE+6 more: $241,000 · Human ServicesLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $789,000 · OtherLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY …REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT RIVERSIDE: $287,500 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERS…OTHER MISC SMALL GRANTS: $217,190 · OtherOTHER MISC SMALL GRANT…UC RIVERSIDE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $175,000 · OtherUC RIVERSIDE SCHOOL OF…REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $87,500 · Other+5 more: $159,750 · Other+5 moreRiverside University Health System Foundation: $379,000 · HealthRiverside Un…OLIVE CREST: $158,800 · HealthOLIVE CRESTPARKVIEW LEGACY FOUNDATION: $157,500 · HealthPARKVIEW LEG…AQUAMOTION ABILITY FOUNDATION: $40,854 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE PACIFIC SOUTHWEST: $40,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $39,000 · Health+6 more: $126,000 · Health+6 morePATH OF LIFE MINISTRIES: $472,000 · ReligionYoung Scholars For Academic Empowerment dba TruEvolution Inc: $452,500 · Youth DevelopmentEmpower You Edutainment: $50,000 · EducationCOMMUNITY NOW: $40,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Human Services$5,014,129Other$1,715,940Health$941,154Religion$472,000Youth Development$452,500Education$50,000Public Safety & Disaster$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION OF RIVERSIDE: $4,773,129 over 8y, 80% of budgetLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $789,000 over 6y, 7.1% of budgetPATH OF LIFE MINISTRIES: $472,000 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetYoung Scholars For Academic Empowerment dba TruEvolution Inc: $452,500 over 3y, 38% of budgetRiverside University Health System Foundation: $379,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetOLIVE CREST: $158,800 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPARKVIEW LEGACY FOUNDATION: $157,500 over 2y, 61% of budgetWALDEN ENVIRONMENT DBA WALDEN FAMILY SERVICES: $125,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetEmpower You Edutainment: $50,000 over 2y, 52% of budgetJANET GOESKE FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION: $49,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAQUAMOTION ABILITY FOUNDATION: $40,854 over 2y, 34% of budgetCOMMUNITY NOW: $40,000 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE PACIFIC SOUTHWEST: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $39,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF ORANGE COUNTY AND THE INLAND EMPIRE INC: $31,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetA COMING OF AGE TO ADULTHOOD INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetRIVERSIDE AREA RAPE CRISIS CENTER: $30,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Happier Life Project Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetDIVERSITY UPLIFTS INC: $18,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTRIAGE CANCER: $18,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetOPERATION SAFE HOUSE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNORTH COUNTY HEALTH PROJECT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Access Center: $8,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Inland Empire Communi…Kaiser Foundation Hos…California Community …S Mark Taper Foundati…In-N-Out Burgers Foun…The California Wellne…Inland Southern Calif…The Grace Helen Spear…Public Health Institu…The California Endowm…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…
Inland Empire Community FoundationCA33.2× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Inland Empire Community Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · California Community Foundation · S Mark Taper Foundation · In-N-Out Burgers Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · Inland Southern California United Way · The Grace Helen Spearman Foundation · Public Health Institute · The California Endowment · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Riverside Community Health Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Riverside Community Health Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Riverside Community Health’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home