Skip to content
Rivers of Steel Heritage Corporation at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Rivers of Steel Heritage Corporation

RIVERS OF STEEL HERITAGE CORPORATION conserves, interprets, develops, and promotes historical, cultural and recreational resources throughout western pennsylvania, including the eight counties that comprise the rivers of steel national heritage area.

$107k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$235kYouth Development$66kHuman Services$47kHousing & Shelter$34kRecreation & Sports$21kEnvironment$16kEducation$12kFood & Nutrition$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $54,076, the rows itemized in this filing. The $107,419 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $53,343 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$34,815
Median grant
1
States reached
$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORWIN ELKS LODGE 2313$34,815
KELLY STRAYHORN THEATRE$19,261
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CENTER OF LIFE: $12k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 12% of Rivers of Steel Heritage Corporation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 98% of the giving stays in PA; by stated purpose, 81%.

Rivers of Steel Heritage Corporationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 7.8% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

44%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$198k · 7 repeat orgs$250k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
17

Total granted

$198k
$215k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-4%
+16%

Still filing today

57%
76%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 36% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    THE BATTLE OF HOMESTEAD FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2020 · $45k · revenue -61%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2017–2018 · $34k
  • PT
    PENNSYLVANIA TROLLEY MUSEUM INC
    3× · 2020–2024 · $32k · revenue -23%

Funded once

  • LE
    LOCAL EXCHANGE
    one grant, 2024 · $60k
  • WC
    WASHINGTON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2024 · $23k · revenue 0%
  • TP
    THE PERENNIAL PROJECT
    one grant, 2022 · $12k · revenue +16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens Inc

Phipps' mission is to inspire and educate all with the beauty and importance of plants, to advance sustainability and promote human and environmental well-being through action and research, and to celebrate its historic glasshouse.

Environment
2
The Friends of the Pittsburgh Institutions
—
3
Historical Society of Western Pennsylvania

The historical society of western pennsylvania is an educational institution that engages and inspires a large and inclusive audience with links to the past, understanding in the present, and guidance for the future by preserving regional…

Arts & Culture
4
Delaware and Lehigh National Heritage Corridor Inc

See schedule oper the bylaws of the delaware & lehigh national heritage corridor(which were updated by the merged board of the national canal musuem and the d&l), our mission is to work with government entities, non-profit organizations…

Arts & Culture
5
Rivers of Steel Heritage Corporation

Rivers of steel heritage corporation conserves, interprets, develops, and promotes historical, cultural and recreational resources throughout western pennsylvania, including the eight counties that comprise the rivers of steel national…

Arts & Culture
6
Longwood Gardens Inc
Philanthropy
7
Pa Museum of Military Vehicles
Arts & Culture
8
Tour-Ed Mine & Museum
Arts & Culture
9
Lehigh County Historical Society

To collect, preserve & publish the history & historical data relative to lehigh county for the education of the general public

Arts & Culture
10
Everhart Museum of Natural History Science and Art

The mission of the everhart museum of natural history, science, and art is to foster knowledge and enjoyment of natural history, science, art, and culture through a variety of exhibitions, educational programs, and events for people of all…

Arts & Culture
11
Frick Art & Historical Center Inc

Furthering the vision of helen clay frick, we share authentic experiences with art, history and nature that inspire and delight.

—
12
Johnstown Historical Society
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pennsylvania Trolley Museum Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Battle of Homestead Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
11/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LOCAL EXCHANGE: $59,950 · OtherLOCAL EXCHANGEBENEVOLENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER OF ELKS LODGE #2313: $34,815 · OtherBENEVOLENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER OF ELKS LODGE #2313Individual grant recipient: $34,350 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPENNSYLVANIA TROLLEY MUSEUM INC: $31,828 · OtherPENNSYLVANIA TROLLEY MUSEUM INCINDUSTRIAL ARTS COLLECTIVE: $15,410 · OtherINDUSTRIAL ARTS COLLECTIVECOUNTY OF GREENE: $11,012 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherBREW HOUSE ARTS: $9,177 · OtherWESTMORELAND FAYETTE HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $8,473 · Other+1 more: $7,067 · OtherTHE BATTLE OF HOMESTEAD FOUNDATION: $44,903 · Arts & CultureTHE BATTLE OF HOMESTEAD FOUNDATIONWESTMORELAND MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART: $26,000 · Arts & CultureWESTMORELAND MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ARTCOMMUNITY THEATER PROJECT CORPORATION: $25,751 · Arts & CultureCOMMUNITY THEATER PROJECT CORPORATIONWASHINGTON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $23,000 · Arts & CultureWASHINGTON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INCTHE SOCIETY TO PRESERVE THE MILLVALE MURALS OF MAXO VANKA: $20,000 · Arts & CultureTHE SOCIETY TO PRESERVE THE MILLVALE MUR…THE PERENNIAL PROJECT: $12,000 · Arts & CultureTHE PERENNIAL PROJECTHARMONIE ASSOCIATES: $6,730 · Arts & CultureVENTURE OUTDOORS INC: $11,253 · EnvironmentGREAT ALLEGHENY PASSAGE CONSERVANCY: $5,129 · EnvironmentCENTER OF LIFE: $12,000 · Human ServicesCHATHAM UNIVERSITY: $12,000 · EducationTHE DRAGON'S DEN: $6,500 · Youth DevelopmentPittsburgh Botanic Garden: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentJOSH GIBSON FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsFRIENDS OF THE RIVERFRONT INC: $6,000 · Community Improvement
Other$222,082Arts & Culture$158,384Environment$16,382Human Services$12,000Education$12,000Youth Development$11,500Recreation & Sports$10,000Community Improvement$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BATTLE OF HOMESTEAD FOUNDATION: $44,903 over 3y, 23% of budgetBENEVOLENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER OF ELKS LODGE #2313: $34,815 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA TROLLEY MUSEUM INC: $31,828 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetWESTMORELAND MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART: $26,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY THEATER PROJECT CORPORATION: $25,751 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetWASHINGTON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $23,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetTHE SOCIETY TO PRESERVE THE MILLVALE MURALS OF MAXO VANKA: $20,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetTHE PERENNIAL PROJECT: $12,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetCENTER OF LIFE: $12,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCHATHAM UNIVERSITY: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVENTURE OUTDOORS INC: $11,253 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetJOSH GIBSON FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetBREW HOUSE ARTS: $9,177 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetWESTMORELAND FAYETTE HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $8,473 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetHARMONIE ASSOCIATES: $6,730 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetTHE DRAGON'S DEN: $6,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE RIVERFRONT INC: $6,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetGREAT ALLEGHENY PASSAGE CONSERVANCY: $5,129 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetPittsburgh Botanic Garden: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pittsburgh Founda…The Grable FoundationRichard King Mellon F…Hillman Family Founda…The Heinz EndowmentsEqt FoundationProgram to Aid Citize…The Jack Buncher Foun…Arts Equity & Educati…McCune Foundation Pnc…Nisource Charitable F…The Burke Foundation
The Pittsburgh FoundationPA31.5× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · The Grable Foundation · Richard King Mellon Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · The Heinz Endowments · Eqt Foundation · Program to Aid Citizen Enterprise Inc · The Jack Buncher Foundation · Arts Equity & Education Fund · McCune Foundation Pnc Bank Na · Nisource Charitable Foundation · The Burke Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rivers of Steel Heritage Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rivers of Steel Heritage Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rivers of Steel Heritage’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home