Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Rivermark Community Credit Union

Provide quality financial services, products and support for members in the local communities we serve.

$153k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$69k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 9 grants below total $149,561 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $152,911 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $3,350 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $69k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.3B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY IMPACT FUND$68,900
BLACK ECONOMIC COLLECTIVE$20,000
LATINO NETWORK$10,000
FOURTH PLAIN FORWARD$10,000
BRADLEY ANGLE$10,000
BEAVERTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION$10,000
THE INTERNATIONAL CARPE DIEM FOUNDATION$9,857
STREET ROOTS$5,654
SUNSHINE DIVISION$5,150
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%STREET ROOTS: $6k → 12%LATINO NETWORK: $10k → 12%BRADLEY ANGLE: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Campbell Institute

Children's institute's mission is to leverage research, practice, policy, and advocacy to shift systems toward justice for families so that all of oregon's children, prenatal to grade 5, have access to opportunity.

Unclassified
2
Latino Economic Development Corporation

Ledc's mission is to catalyze economic advancement of latinos and local communities by bridging the gap to capital and resources to achieve financial prosperity. participants in our programs learn how to build their long-term financial…

Community Improvement
3
Center for Intercultural Organizing

Center for intercultural organizing dba unite oregon is a diverse, grassroots organization working to build a multicultural movement for immigrant and refugee rights through education, civic engagement, community organizing and…

Civil Rights
4
Root Change Inc

Root change's mission is to bring people together to question assumptions, think deeply, test ideas, and lead the way to a world built on social justice principles.

Employment
5
Inland Empire Community Foundation

Strengthening the Inland Empire through Philanthropy.

Philanthropy
6
Economic Development Corporation of Los Angeles County

The function of the corporation shall be to ease the burdens of government by assisting, implementing, supporting and/or contributing to the support of programs, projects and activities of a public nature. which are directed toward…

7
Metro Equity Collabotrative

To provide education and resources to minority operated businesses

Education
8
Urban League of Portland Inc

To help empower african americans and others achieve equality in education, employment, and economic security.

Human Services
9
Race Forward

Race forward supports communities and public institutions to achieve a just multiracial democratic society through governance that advances social justice.

Community Improvement
10
Boston Impact Initiative Fund

Form 990 - organization's mission or most significant activitiesboston impact initiative (bii) is a nonprofit impact investment fund and certified community development financial institution (cdfi). bii provides small businesses,…

Community Improvement
11
Mi Casa Resource Center

Advancing economic prosperity of the latino community.

Human Services
12
Cultivate Initiatives

The organization collectively works alongside those on the margins to empower individuals and communities through an inclusive range of services and support in east portland.

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bradley Angle and the most unlike its peers is The International Carpe Diem Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

The Community Impact Fund — $68,900 · PhilanthropyThe Community Impact FundBLACK ECONOMIC COLLECTIVE — $20,000 · Community ImprovementBLACK ECONOMIC COLLECT…FOURTH PLAIN FORWARD — $10,000 · Community ImprovementFOURTH PLAIN FORWARDLatino Network — $10,000 · Human ServicesLatino NetworkBradley Angle — $10,000 · Human ServicesBradley AngleSTREET ROOTS INC — $5,654 · Human ServicesSTREET ROOTS INCBEAVERTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $10,000 · EducationThe International Carpe Diem Foundation — $9,857 · InternationalSUNSHINE DIVISION INC — $5,150 · Crime & Legal
Philanthropy$68,900Community Improvement$30,000Human Services$25,654Education$10,000International$9,857Crime & Legal$5,150

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe Community Impact Fund — $68,900 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetBLACK ECONOMIC COLLECTIVE — $20,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetBEAVERTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetLatino Network — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBradley Angle — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFOURTH PLAIN FORWARD — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetThe International Carpe Diem Foundation — $9,857 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetSTREET ROOTS INC — $5,654 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSUNSHINE DIVISION INC — $5,150 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation TrustOR15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · The Oregon Community Foundation · Onpoint Community Credit Union · United Way of the Columbia-Willamette · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · The Collins Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Rivermark Community Credit Union funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 15%
  • Black Economic Collective90% of income from government
  • Latino Network15% of income from government
  • Bradley Angle10% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph