Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rita B & Walter M Murphy Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$77k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Health$147kHousing & Shelter$34kHuman Services$34kEducation$32kReligion$14kYouth Development$8kRecreation & Sports$5kAnimals$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HARTFORD HOSPITAL HELEN & HARRY GRAD FD$8,500
ST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$7,000
ALS ASSOCIATION$6,000
ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION OF CT$5,000
MALTA HOUSE OF CARE MOBILE CLINIC$5,000
EAST CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
IMMACULATE CONCEPTION SHELTER & HOUSING$4,500
WOUNDED WARRIORS PROJECT$4,000
LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR$4,000
ST FRANCIS HOSPITALMANDELL CENTER MS$3,500
COVENANT HOUSE$3,500
COVE CENTER FOR GRIEVING$2,750
STARFISH FOUNDATION$2,000
LIVE STRONG FOUNDATION$2,000
MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%COVENANT HOUSE: $4k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $3k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $3k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $3k → 17%COVE CENTER FOR GRIEVING: $3k → 12%COVE CENTER FOR GRIEVING: $3k → 12%COVE CENTER FOR GRIEVING: $3k → 12%COVE CENTER FOR GRIEVING: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
CT
MD
KS
TN
DC
MS
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$276k · 24 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
2

Total granted

$276k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+42%

Still filing today

50%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyPublic BenefitYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $25k · revenue +59%
  • AL
    AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN
    4× · 2022–2025 · $23k · revenue +72%
  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $14k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • MA
    MANCHESTER AREA CONFERENCE OF CHURCHES INC
    one grant, 2025 · $1k · revenue 0%
  • PO
    PROTECTORS OF ANIMALS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2025 · $500 · revenue +42%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Foundation for Women's Cancer

To support and empower all affected by gynecologic cancers through education, research, and public awareness.

Health
2
National Comprehensive Cancer Network

To define and advance quality, effective, equitable, and accessible cancer care and prevention so all people can live better lives.

Health
3
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
4
CureCervicalCancer

Dedicated to the early detection and prevention of cervical cancer around the globe for the women who need it most.

International
5
Als United Connecticut

The mission of the als united connecticut is to provide comprehensive support to improve quality of life for people with als and their families, while advocating for increased support and advancing innovative research for new treatments…

Health
6
Oncology and Kids Inc

To help kids and families heal the emotional scars of childhood cancer and learn to thrive.

Human Services
7
Search for Change Inc

Dedicated to improving the quality of life and increasing the self sufficiency of individuals with emotional, social and economic barriers. this is accomplished by providing direct support and assistance needed to enable individuals to…

Human Services
8
American Foundation for Suicide Prevention

To saves lives and bring hope to those affected by suicide.

Health
9
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
10
Safe Alliance Inc

To provide hope and healing to those impacted by domestic violence and sexual assault.

Human Services
11
Brighton Marine Inc

Brighton marine, inc. provides military and veteran families with comprehensive campus-based quality health care, as well as affordable and supportive housing for at-risk veterans and their families.

Health
12
Massachusetts Children'S Alliance Inc

Massachusetts children's alliance pioneers the most promising, leading-edge ways that help victims of child abuse.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Connecticut Inc; the most unlike its peers is Take a Vet Fishing Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HARTFORD HOSPITAL HELEN & HARRY GRAD FD: $32,500 · OtherHARTFORD HOSPITAL HELEN & HARRY GRAD FDEAST CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $20,000 · OtherEAST CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOLMALTA HOUSE OF CARE MOBILE CLINIC: $20,000 · OtherMALTA HOUSE OF CARE MOBILE CLINICALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION OF CT: $19,000 · OtherALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION OF CTIMMACULATE CONCEPTION SHELTER & HOUSING: $16,500 · OtherIMMACULATE CONCEPTION SHELTER & HOUSINGLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $14,000 · OtherLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POORST FRANCIS HOSPITALMANDELL CENTER MS: $12,500 · OtherST FRANCIS HOSPITALMANDELL CENTER MSBEST BUDDIES OF CT: $6,750 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY - HARTFORD: $6,250 · Other+5 more: $16,500 · Other+5 moreST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $25,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RES…AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $23,000 · HealthAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SC…MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CONNECTICUT INC: $7,000 · HealthMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION…WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $14,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIO…COVENANT HOUSE: $11,500 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSEThe Cove Center for Grieving Children Inc: $10,750 · Human ServicesThe Cove Cente…THE STARFISH FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 · EducationFALMOUTH SCHOLARSHIP ASSOCIATION INC: $4,000 · EducationThe Livestrong Foundation: $8,000 · PhilanthropyMANCHESTER AREA CONFERENCE OF CHURCHES INC: $1,250 · Youth DevelopmentTake A Vet Fishing Inc: $1,000 · Public BenefitPROTECTORS OF ANIMALS INC: $500 · Animals
Other$164,000Health$55,000Human Services$36,250Education$12,000Philanthropy$8,000Youth Development$1,250Public Benefit$1,000Animals$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $25,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $23,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $14,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $11,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Cove Center for Grieving Children Inc: $10,750 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetThe Livestrong Foundation: $8,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE STARFISH FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CONNECTICUT INC: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS CONNECTICUT INC: $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAFE PASSAGE INC: $5,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFALMOUTH SCHOLARSHIP ASSOCIATION INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetMANCHESTER AREA CONFERENCE OF CHURCHES INC: $1,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTake A Vet Fishing Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds The Cove Center for Grieving Children Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Livestrong Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE STARFISH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CONNECTICUT INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS CONNECTICUT INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFE PASSAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds FALMOUTH SCHOLARSHIP ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MANCHESTER AREA CONFERENCE OF CHURCHES INC ↗
  • Who funds Take A Vet Fishing Inc ↗
  • Who funds PROTECTORS OF ANIMALS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation IncNY14.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Aetna Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rita B & Walter M Murphy Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rita B & Walter M Murphy Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 42%
  • Safe Passage Inc: 55% of income from government
  • Special Olympics Connecticut Inc: 42% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Rita B & Walter M Murphy Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Rita B & Walter M Murphy Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rita B & Walter M Murphy’s filings →

More from the funding graph