Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rini Family Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$150k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Health$238kReligion$134kPhilanthropy$131kEducation$114kEnvironment$105kArts & Culture$90kCommunity Improvement$83kInternational$55kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $128k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE FOUNDATIO$40,000
ALLEGHENY COLLEGE$12,000
Individual grant recipient$12,000
RAINEY INSTITUTE$12,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$12,000
SAMARITANS PURSE$10,000
THE CITY MISSION$10,000
MALACHI CENTER$10,000
CATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$10,000
LAKE ERIE JUNIOR NATURE & SCIENCE CENTER$5,000
HUNTINGTONS DISEASE SOCIETY OF AMERICA I$5,000
ST RAPHAEL PARISH$5,000
WESTERN RESERVE ROWING ASSOCIATION$3,500
CONSERVANCY FOR CUYAHOGA VALLEY NATIONAL$2,500
NORTH OLMSTED EVANGELICAL FRIENDS CHURCH$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $137k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC: $40k → 17%HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC: $22k → 17%HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE: $25k → 17%HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE: $25k → 17%HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE: $25k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$819k · 14 repeat orgs$46k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
8

Total granted

$819k
$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+74%
+101%

Still filing today

50%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesReligionArts & CultureAnimalsRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HO
    HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $137k · revenue +28%
  • AC
    ALLEGHENY COLLEGE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $72k · revenue +1%
  • EB
    ELEANOR B RAINEY MEMORIAL INSTITUTE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $67k · revenue +74%

Funded once

  • T2
    TUNNEL 2 TOWERS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • HD
    HUNTINGTON DISEASE SOCIETY
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • BG
    BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
West Creek Conservancy

Our mission is to enrich the lives of all people in northeast ohio by conserving natural habitats, restoring the ecological value of our region's lands and waters, and expanding opportunities to connect people from all cultures to…

Environment
2
Cincinnati Museum Center

Cincinnati museum center inspires people of all ages to learn more about our world through science, regional history, and educational, engaging and meaningful experiences.

Arts & Culture
3
Cardinal Land Conservancy

To benefit the general public by preserving natural lands and significant habitats, lands suitable for the production of food, timber, or other cultivated or natural products, lands creating scenic vistas for public enjoyment, lands with…

Environment
4
Western Pennsylvania Conservancy

The western pennsylvania conservancy protects and restores exceptional places to provide our region with clean waters and healthy forests, wildlife and natural areas for the benefit of present and future generations. the conservancy…

Environment
5
Columbus Association of Realtors

The columbus association of realtors is a local level, not-for-profit trade association. founded in 1908, columbus association of realtors is comprised of more than 9,100 real estate professionals engaged in residential sales and leasing,…

—
6
Western Reserve Land Conservancy

Land conservation and restoration for public benefit

Environment
7
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
8
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
9
Cleveland Zoological Society

Cleveland zoological society is the nonprofit partner of cleveland metroparks zoo, committed to raising awareness of the zoo as a community priority; securing private donations; and running a membership program that provides operating and…

Animals
10
Cleveland Botanical Garden

The cleveland botanical garden connects people with the wonder, beauty, and value of trees and plants, to inspire action for healthy communities.

Environment
11
Ohio State Bar Association

The ohio state bar association (the "association") is an unincorporated voluntary non-profit organization. the association was formed to promote justice and advance the interests of the legal profession.

—
12
Carnegie Institute

To preserve and expand the resources of art and science as agents of personal growth and social advancement in pittsburgh and beyond.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Cleveland Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST MALACHI CENTER INCORPORATED: $119,300 · OtherST MALACHI CENTER INCORPORATEDCATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $106,000 · OtherCATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $102,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYTHE HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE FOUNDATION: $80,000 · OtherTHE HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE FOUNDATIONCITY MISSION: $73,000 · OtherCITY MISSIONIndividual grant recipient: $71,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientELEANOR B RAINEY MEMORIAL INSTITUTE: $67,000 · OtherELEANOR B RAINEY MEMORIAL INSTITUTECLEVELAND METROPARKS: $47,000 · OtherCLEVELAND METROPARKS+12 more: $85,000 · Other+12 moreHOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC: $137,000 · Human ServicesHOSPICE OF THE…ALLEGHENY COLLEGE: $72,000 · EducationALLEGHENY …STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $30,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SI…+1 more: $2,000 · EducationSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $55,000 · ReligionTHE CLEVELAND FOUNDATION: $25,000 · PhilanthropyLAKE ERIE NATURE AND SCIENCE CENTER: $23,000 · Arts & CultureWESTERN RESERVE ROWING ASSOCIATION: $3,500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$750,800Human Services$137,000Education$104,000Religion$55,000Philanthropy$25,000Arts & Culture$23,000Recreation & Sports$3,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC: $137,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $106,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $102,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE FOUNDATION: $80,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetALLEGHENY COLLEGE: $72,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetELEANOR B RAINEY MEMORIAL INSTITUTE: $67,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $55,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE ERIE NATURE AND SCIENCE CENTER: $23,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCONSERVANCY FOR CUYAHOGA VALLEY NATIONAL PARK: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBowling Green State University Foundation Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of the Cuyahoga County Animal Shelter: $2,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds THE HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALLEGHENY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ELEANOR B RAINEY MEMORIAL INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CLEVELAND FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LAKE ERIE NATURE AND SCIENCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN RESERVE ROWING ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds CONSERVANCY FOR CUYAHOGA VALLEY NATIONAL PARK ↗
  • Who funds Bowling Green State University Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Friends of the Cuyahoga County Animal Shelter ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Cleveland FoundationOH15.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Cleveland Foundation · The Reinberger Foundation · The Char and Chuck Fowler Family Foundation · The Nord Family Foundation · The George Gund Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rini Family Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rini Family Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rini Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph