Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rilan Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$31k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$23k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Religion$145kHuman Services$5kEducation$4kInternational$500Youth Development$250Philanthropy$250
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $23k
$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$223k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAITH WINS$23,000
TEACH RIGHT USA$4,000
DUTCH SHEETS MINISTRIES$2,000
TEMPLE BAPTIST CHURCH$1,800
LIBERTY SPRINGS PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%THE OPEN DOOR CHRISTIAN CENTER: $2k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
CA
CO
KY
NC
SC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$129k · 6 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +60% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
17

Total granted

$129k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
0%

Still filing today

50%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionPublic BenefitHuman ServicesEducationInternationalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DT
    DAMON THOMPSON MINISTRIES INC
    4× · 2018–2021 · $52k · revenue +69%
  • FW
    Faith Wins
    2× · 2024–2025 · $33k · revenue -30%
  • HC
    HOPE CHAPEL OF CAROLINA
    5× · 2018–2022 · $25k

Funded once

  • WO
    WORD OF GOD CHURCH & MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • PF
    PALMETTO FRONT LINE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $4k · revenue -69%
  • LE
    LOU ENGLE MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wayne Dorsett Ministries Inc

To reach lost people with the transforming Gospel of Jesus Christ

Religion
2
Tim Lee Ministries

Tim Lee Ministries purpose is to preach the life changing truth of the Word of God, declaring salvation through Jesus Christ and a strong message of revival.

—
3
Jim King Ministries Inc

Proclaim the gospel of jesus christ

Religion
4
Frontlines Ministries

Connecting biblical soul care to missions through the local church.

Religion
5
Torch of Christ Ministries

Torch of Christ Ministries provides evangelism, education, and missional support through the dissemination of information with the primary intent of preaching the gospel of Jesus Christ to all.

Religion
6
Ambassadors for Christ International - Usa Inc

Ambassadors for Christ International - USA is a fellowship of gospel preachers and teachers whose mission is to preach Christ, edify the Church, and to glorify God and serve as a catalyst for revival, evangelism, and training of Christians…

Religion
7
Tim Robnett Ministries Dba ETeamGlobal

To Identify, Affirm, Train, and Mobilize Ephesians 4 evangelists to equip the church for evangelism.

Religion
8
Worldcast Ministries

Publishing, writing, sales & distribution of Christian Books; speaking throughout the US and foreign countries on Christian subjects. Attending orphanages, Christian schools and Bible colleges in the US and foreign countries assisting in…

Religion
9
King Ministries International

To spread the Gospel of Jesus the Christ

Religion
10
Awakening Ministries International

Proclaim the gospel worldwide, prepare followers of jesus christ, and propel those into their god given destiny.

Religion
11
Paul White Ministries

Present the gospel

Religion
12
Leadership Revolution Inc

Leadership Revolution is a ministry founded to develop leaders globally who will spread the gospel and make disciples in their arena of influence.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Damon Thompson Ministries Inc; the most unlike its peers is Canoeing for Kids. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DAMON THOMPSON MINISTRIES INC: $51,950 · ReligionDAMON THOMPSON MINISTRIES INCFaith Wins: $33,000 · ReligionFaith WinsDUTCH SHEETS MINISTRIES INC: $10,000 · ReligionDUTCH SHEETS MINISTRIES INC+2 more: $3,000 · ReligionHOPE CHAPEL OF CAROLINA: $24,550 · OtherHOPE CHAPEL OF CAROLINATHE POTTER'S HOUSE: $5,000 · OtherTHE POTTER'S HOUSEWORD OF GOD CHURCH & MINISTRIES: $5,000 · OtherWORD OF GOD CHURCH & MINISTRIESEAGLE MOUNTAIN INTERNATIONAL CHURCH INC: $4,500 · OtherEAGLE MOUNTAIN INTERNATIONAL CHURC…DUTCH STREET MINISTRIES: $2,000 · OtherTEMPLE BAPTIST CHURCH: $1,800 · Other+10 more: $4,500 · Other+10 moreTEACH RIGHT USA: $4,000 · EducationPALMETTO FRONT LINE FOUNDATION: $3,500 · Public BenefitTHE OPEN DOOR CHRISTIAN CENTER: $1,500 · Human ServicesONE COLLECTIVE: $500 · InternationalCanoeing for Kids: $250 · Philanthropy
Religion$97,950Other$47,350Education$4,000Public Benefit$3,500Human Services$1,500International$500Philanthropy$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDAMON THOMPSON MINISTRIES INC: $51,950 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetFaith Wins: $33,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetDUTCH SHEETS MINISTRIES INC: $10,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPALMETTO FRONT LINE FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetLOU ENGLE MINISTRIES: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE OPEN DOOR CHRISTIAN CENTER: $1,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHope for Brazil Ministries Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetONE COLLECTIVE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCanoeing for Kids: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DAMON THOMPSON MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Faith Wins ↗
  • Who funds DUTCH SHEETS MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds TEACH RIGHT USA ↗
  • Who funds PALMETTO FRONT LINE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LOU ENGLE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds THE OPEN DOOR CHRISTIAN CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Hope for Brazil Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds ONE COLLECTIVE ↗
  • Who funds Canoeing for Kids ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Christian Community Foundation IncCO16.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Christian Community Foundation Inc · Servant Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rilan Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rilan Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rilan’s filings →

    More from the funding graph