· Private foundation
Rikli Family Foundation Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 56% of RIKLI FAMILY FOUNDATION TRUST’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TANGLEWOOD COMMUNITY NATURE CENTER INC | $5,000 |
| THE PARK CHURCH | $5,000 |
| OAK MEADOW METHODIST CHURCH | $4,600 |
| SAN FRANCISCO JAPANTOWN FOUNDATION | $4,000 |
| ARNOT OGDEN MEDICAL CENTER | $3,000 |
| GARDENS OF GOLDEN GATE PARK | $3,000 |
| CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY | $3,000 |
| MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN | $3,000 |
| SVA ALUMN SOCIETY INC | $3,000 |
| FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION | $3,000 |
| VIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC | $3,000 |
| ROCK AND ROLL HALL OF FAME | $3,000 |
| ARNOT ART MUSEUM | $1,500 |
| NORTH CENTRAL COLLEGE HOUSE OF | $1,500 |
| CHEMUNG COUNTY PERFORMING ARTS INC | $1,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 59% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.
67 repeat relationships — 30 still active in FY2025, 37 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TNTANGLEWOOD NATURE CENTER & MUSEUM INC9× · 2017–2025 · $30k · revenue +175%
- AOARNOT OGDEN MEDICAL CENTER9× · 2017–2025 · $27k · revenue +56%
- MIMAKE IT CLEAR MINISTRIES9× · 2017–2025 · $12k · revenue +109%
Funded once
- BGBILL GRAHAM MEMORIAL FOUNDATIONone grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue +21%
- SASAN ANTONIO FOOD BANKone grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +18%
- FPFIRST PRESBYTERIOAN CHURCH OFone grant, 2019 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…
The Museum of Modern Art is a private, non-profit institution chartered by the State of New York Department of Education in 1929 to foster public awareness of modern and contemporary art. (Continued in Schedule O)
California college of the arts educates students to shape culture and society through the practice and critical study of art, architecture, design, and writing. benefitting from its san francisco bay area location, the college prepares…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.
Guided by artists, rooted in new mexico, site santa fe celebrates contemporary creative expression.
San diego zoo wildlife alliance is committed to saving species worldwide by uniting our expertise in wildlife care and conservation science with our dedication to inspiring passion for nature.
The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.
The santa fe community foundation inspires philanthropic generosity, strengthens nonprofits, and fosters positive change to build a more vibrant, healthy, and resilient region. the foundation's vision is a thriving northern new mexico,…
The aquarium of the pacific's mission is to instill a sense of wonder, respect, and stewardship for the pacific ocean, its inhabitants, and ecosystems.
The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.
To connect all people with wildlife, inspire caring for nature, and advance conservation action.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Missouri Botanical Garden Board of Trustees and the most unlike its peers is Cordonate. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
75 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 75 of the 119 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TANGLEWOOD NATURE CENTER & MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds ARNOT OGDEN MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE MISSOURI SYMPHONY ↗
- Who funds MAKE IT CLEAR MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds CHEMUNG COUNTY PERFORMING ARTS INC CLEMENS CENTER ↗
- Who funds ARNOT ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO SYMPHONY LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds THE SAN FRANCISCO JAPANTOWN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BSF INTERNATIONAL LLC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds California Native Plant Society ↗
- Who funds MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES ↗
- Who funds THE ROCK AND ROLL HALL OF FAME AND MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds Living on the Edge Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds ALAMO HEIGHTS SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SON SHINE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds SAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA FILM INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds Kansas 4-H Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds TEXAS PUBLIC RADIO ↗
- Who funds MCNAY ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Downtown Streets Inc ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST SCHOOL OF ART ↗
- Who funds LANDA GARDENS CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds WSKG PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds THE CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: San Antonio Area Foundation · Jack and Doris Smothers and Bud Smothers Memorial Foundation · Nancy Smith Hurd Foundation · Elizabeth Huth Coates Charitable Foundation of 1992 · The Brown Foundation Inc · The Nancy Wood Moorman Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Muriel F Siebert Foundation Inc · Charitable Foundation Frost F0359600 · McNabb Foundation · Mays Family Foundation · Harvey E Najim Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Rikli Family Foundation Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.