Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rikli Family Foundation Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$63k
Granted FY2025still arriving
38
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$185kArts & Culture$100kEnvironment$61kEducation$61kHealth$33kPhilanthropy$17kHuman Services$12kRecreation & Sports$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE PARK CHURCH$5,000
TANGLEWOOD COMMUNITY NATURE CENTER INC$5,000
OAK MEADOW METHODIST CHURCH$4,600
SAN FRANCISCO JAPANTOWN FOUNDATION$4,000
VIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC$3,000
ARNOT OGDEN MEDICAL CENTER$3,000
SVA ALUMN SOCIETY INC$3,000
CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY$3,000
FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION$3,000
MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN$3,000
ROCK AND ROLL HALL OF FAME$3,000
GARDENS OF GOLDEN GATE PARK$3,000
ARNOT ART MUSEUM$1,500
NORTH CENTRAL COLLEGE HOUSE OF$1,500
CHEMUNG COUNTY PERFORMING ARTS INC$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 59% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT: $750 → 9%CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT: $500 → 9%CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT: $500 → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $2k → 14%CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT: $500 → 9%CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT: $500 → 9%CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT: $500 → 9%CHRISTIAN ASSISTANCE MINISTRY INC: $375 → 16%VIVALON: $750 → 8%VIVALON: $500 → 8%FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION: $3k → 16%BARSHOP JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
OR
OH
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
KS
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$465k · 67 repeat orgs$52k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

67 repeat relationships: 30 still active in FY2025, 37 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

67
43

Total granted

$465k
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+22%

Still filing today

61%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationEnvironmentHuman ServicesPhilanthropyReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TN
    TANGLEWOOD NATURE CENTER & MUSEUM INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $30k · revenue +175%
  • AO
    ARNOT OGDEN MEDICAL CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $27k · revenue +56%
  • MI
    MAKE IT CLEAR MINISTRIES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $12k · revenue +109%

Funded once

  • BG
    BILL GRAHAM MEMORIAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue +21%
  • SA
    SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +18%
  • FP
    FIRST PRESBYTERIOAN CHURCH OF
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
2
Museum of Modern Art

The Museum of Modern Art is a private, non-profit institution chartered by the State of New York Department of Education in 1929 to foster public awareness of modern and contemporary art. (Continued in Schedule O)

Arts & Culture
3
California College of the Arts

California college of the arts educates students to shape culture and society through the practice and critical study of art, architecture, design, and writing. benefitting from its san francisco bay area location, the college prepares…

Education
4
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
5
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
6
Site Santa Fe

Guided by artists, rooted in new mexico, site santa fe celebrates contemporary creative expression.

Arts & Culture
7
Zoological Society of San Diego

San diego zoo wildlife alliance is committed to saving species worldwide by uniting our expertise in wildlife care and conservation science with our dedication to inspiring passion for nature.

Animals
8
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
9
Santa Fe Community Foundation

The santa fe community foundation inspires philanthropic generosity, strengthens nonprofits, and fosters positive change to build a more vibrant, healthy, and resilient region. the foundation's vision is a thriving northern new mexico,…

Philanthropy
10
Aquarium of the Pacific Corporation

The aquarium of the pacific's mission is to instill a sense of wonder, respect, and stewardship for the pacific ocean, its inhabitants, and ecosystems.

Animals
11
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
12
San Francisco Zoological Society

To connect all people with wildlife, inspire caring for nature, and advance conservation action.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Missouri Botanical Garden Board of Trustees; the most unlike its peers is Cordonate. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

75 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 75 of the 119 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
74/75
Grantees still filing
54/75
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OAK MEADOW METHODIST CHURCH: $72,600 · OtherOAK MEADOW METHODIST CHURCHTHE PARK CHURCH: $40,000 · OtherTHE PARK CHURCHCOMMUNITY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $24,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY UNITED METHODIST CHURCHTHE MISSOURI SYMPHONY: $17,000 · OtherMAKE IT CLEAR MINISTRIES: $11,800 · Other+73 more: $157,375 · Other+73 moreCHEMUNG COUNTY PERFORMING ARTS INC CLEMENS CENTER: $10,513 · Arts & CultureCHEMUNG COUNTY…ARNOT ART MUSEUM: $10,513 · Arts & CultureARNOT ART MUSE…SAN ANTONIO SYMPHONY LEAGUE: $10,300 · Arts & CultureSAN ANTONIO SY…THE ROCK AND ROLL HALL OF FAME AND MUSEUM INC: $6,750 · Arts & CultureTHE ROCK AND R…CALIFORNIA FILM INSTITUTE: $5,050 · Arts & CultureCALIFORNIA FIL…TEXAS PUBLIC RADIO: $4,500 · Arts & CultureTEXAS PUBLIC R…MCNAY ART MUSEUM: $4,000 · Arts & CultureMCNAY ART MUSE…WSKG PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS COUNCIL: $3,500 · Arts & CultureSVA ALUMNI SOCIETY INC: $3,000 · Arts & CultureARTPACE INC (AUDIT): $2,500 · Arts & CultureSAN ANTONIO CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $2,500 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $2,500 · Arts & CultureTANGLEWOOD NATURE CENTER & MUSEUM INC: $29,600 · EnvironmentTANGLEWOOD…MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES: $7,250 · EnvironmentMISSOURI B…California Native Plant Society: $7,250 · EnvironmentCalifornia…SAN FRANCISCO BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY AT STRYBING ARBORETUM: $3,000 · EnvironmentSAN FRANCI…+4 more: $3,000 · Environment+4 moreUNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION: $7,500 · EducationALAMO HEIGHTS SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $6,500 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $3,750 · EducationVIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · EducationTrustees of Hamilton College: $1,900 · EducationDavidson College: $1,800 · EducationBig Shoulders Fund: $1,000 · EducationNorth Central College: $1,000 · EducationCornell University: $1,000 · Education+3 more: $1,500 · EducationARNOT OGDEN MEDICAL CENTER: $27,300 · HealthBSF INTERNATIONAL LLC: $8,500 · ReligionLiving on the Edge Ministries Inc: $6,500 · ReligionCANAL ALLIANCE: $875 · ReligionTHE SAN FRANCISCO JAPANTOWN FOUNDATION: $9,250 · PhilanthropyBILL GRAHAM MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $3,000 · PhilanthropyLEADERS IN FURTHERING EDUCATION INC: $1,750 · PhilanthropyVERSE BY VERSE MINISTRY INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$322,775Arts & Culture$65,626Environment$50,100Education$28,950Health$27,300Religion$15,875Philanthropy$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTANGLEWOOD NATURE CENTER & MUSEUM INC: $29,600 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetARNOT OGDEN MEDICAL CENTER: $27,300 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MISSOURI SYMPHONY: $17,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetMAKE IT CLEAR MINISTRIES: $11,800 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetCHEMUNG COUNTY PERFORMING ARTS INC CLEMENS CENTER: $10,513 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetARNOT ART MUSEUM: $10,513 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetSAN ANTONIO SYMPHONY LEAGUE: $10,300 over 5y, 3.6% of budgetTHE SAN FRANCISCO JAPANTOWN FOUNDATION: $9,250 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetBSF INTERNATIONAL LLC: $8,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES: $7,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCalifornia Native Plant Society: $7,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROCK AND ROLL HALL OF FAME AND MUSEUM INC: $6,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALAMO HEIGHTS SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $6,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLiving on the Edge Ministries Inc: $6,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSON SHINE MINISTRIES INC: $6,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE: $5,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA FILM INSTITUTE: $5,050 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetKansas 4-H Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTEXAS PUBLIC RADIO: $4,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMCNAY ART MUSEUM: $4,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $3,750 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDowntown Streets Inc: $3,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWEST SCHOOL OF ART: $3,700 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLANDA GARDENS CONSERVANCY: $3,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetWSKG PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS COUNCIL: $3,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT: $3,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY AT STRYBING ARBORETUM: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPHIL HARDBERGER PARK CONSERVANCY: $3,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetBILL GRAHAM MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION SERVICES INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSVA ALUMNI SOCIETY INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetARTPACE INC (AUDIT): $2,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSAN ANTONIO CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TEXAS CAVALIERS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSAN ANTONIO OASIS: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMIND SCIENCE FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetReed Schools Foundation: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetZACHARY SCOTT THEATRE CENTER: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Hamilton College: $1,900 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetDavidson College: $1,800 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWILDCARE: $1,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetExtrafood: $1,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLEADERS IN FURTHERING EDUCATION INC: $1,750 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TANGLEWOOD NATURE CENTER & MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds ARNOT OGDEN MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE MISSOURI SYMPHONY ↗
  • Who funds MAKE IT CLEAR MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds CHEMUNG COUNTY PERFORMING ARTS INC CLEMENS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ARNOT ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO SYMPHONY LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds THE SAN FRANCISCO JAPANTOWN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BSF INTERNATIONAL LLC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES ↗
  • Who funds California Native Plant Society ↗
  • Who funds THE ROCK AND ROLL HALL OF FAME AND MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds ALAMO HEIGHTS SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Living on the Edge Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds SON SHINE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA FILM INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Kansas 4-H Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS PUBLIC RADIO ↗
  • Who funds MCNAY ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Downtown Streets Inc ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST SCHOOL OF ART ↗
  • Who funds LANDA GARDENS CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds WSKG PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds THE CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

San Antonio Area FoundationTX33.5× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: San Antonio Area Foundation · Jack and Doris Smothers and Bud Smothers Memorial Foundation · Nancy Smith Hurd Foundation · Elizabeth Huth Coates Charitable Foundation of 1992 · The Brown Foundation Inc · The Nancy Wood Moorman Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Muriel F Siebert Foundation Inc · Charitable Foundation Frost F0359600 · McNabb Foundation · Mays Family Foundation · Harvey E Najim Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rikli Family Foundation Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rikli Family Foundation Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    22report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 119 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rikli Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph