Skip to content
Rick and Marsha Floyd Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Rick and Marsha Floyd Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$105k
Granted FY2025still arriving
42
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Human Services$58kEducation$32kHealth$26kYouth Development$14kCommunity Improvement$8kRecreation & Sports$5kReligion$5kCrime & Legal$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 42 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Salvation Army Harbor House$8,200
Individual grant recipient$7,500
Whetstone Boys Ranch$6,000
Care to Learn$5,000
Child Advocacy Center$5,000
Big Brothers Big Sisters of The Ozarks$5,000
Children's Smile Center$5,000
Foundation for Springfield Public Schools$4,426
PPS Foundation for Women in Need$4,300
Good Samaritan Boys Ranch$4,200
Praise Assembly of God$4,000
Pathways Project Coalition of the Ozarks$3,700
Ozarks Counseling Center$3,000
Shiloh Summer Camp Inc$3,000
Hope Counseling Center$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $39k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 62% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%Wounded Warrior Project: $1k → 14%Dogwood Ranch: $10k → 8%Pathways Project Coalition of the Ozarks: $4k → 13%Good Samaritan Boys Ranch: $4k → 18%Whetstone Boys Ranch: $6k → 19%Least of These: $1k → 8%Good Samaritan Boys Ranch: $2k → 18%OACAC: $2k → 15%Care to Learn: $5k → 15%Harmony House: $1k → 15%Honor Flight of the Ozarks: $500 → 15%Ozarks Regional YMCA: $2k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

30%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$54k · 8 repeat orgs$129k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 34 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
18

Total granted

$54k
$55k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+3%

Still filing today

75%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 30% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $74k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
Human ServicesHealthPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2024–2025 · $18k
  • OC
    Ozarks Counseling Center
    2× · 2024–2025 · $8k
  • GS
    Good Samaritan Boys Ranch
    2× · 2024–2025 · $6k · revenue -5%

Funded once

  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2024 · $13k
  • DR
    DOGWOOD RANCH CORPORATION
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
  • CP
    COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP OF THE OZARKS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $8k · revenue +3%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ozark Regional Share and Care

Provide basic human services such as food, clothing, shelter, medical, etc. for local people in need

Human Services
2
Ozarks New Hope Inc

Provide integrated, patient-centered health services designed to meet the needs of all patients, regardless of ability to pay; help the healthcare industry better serve patients & community by promoting public health; supporting…

Health
3
Ozark Opportunities Inc

To render constructive civic service, including the sponsorship of social, educational, and economic projects for the promotion of the welfare of the community and the citizens of the ozarks situated in baxter, boone, marion, newton,…

Community Improvement
4
Recovery Center of the Ozarks

To provide substance abuse counceling and services

Health
5
Freedom House Ministries

House of Hope Kansas City is unique, because we work with teens and their parents to find solutions and ultimately, restoration of healthy family relationships. We serve families in crisis with our program for residents to experience the…

Education
6
Care Center-Child Abuse Response and Evaluation Inc Dba the Care Center

The CARE Center exists to reduce trauma for child abuse victims and their families, coordinate a multidisciplinary approach to child abuse investigations, and provide free, effective child abuse prevention resources and education.

Human Services
7
Womens Crisis Center of Taney County Inc

The Crisis Center provides shelter and services to victims and their children of domestic and sexual violence.

Human Services
8
Ozarks Resource Group

The mission of ozarks community health center is to provide greater access to quality, compassionate, and professional healthcare through our comprehensive health system and community partnerships.

Health
9
Central Ozarks Private Industry Council

Central Ozarks Private Industry Council, Incorporated (COPIC) strives to provide all customers with access to professional, high-quality workforce development services, resulting in sustainable employment and contributing to positive…

Employment
10
Southeast Arkansas Behavioral Healthcare

To create an environment where staff is conscientious to the behavioral health needs of the area in a manner which is client oriented, accessible, affordable, and quality driven.

Health
11
Family Health Center of Boone County

To provide access to primary medical, dental and mental health services for community members, with emphasis on the medically underserved, to improve the health of the community and to train future health care providers.

—
12
Ozark Center

To improve the health of the communities we serve through contemporary, innovative, evidence-based, trauma-informed, quality behavioral healthcare solutions.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Violence Center; the most unlike its peers is Silver Dollar City Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
10/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $17,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSALVATION ARMY: $13,121 · OtherSALVATION ARMYSalvation Army Harbor House: $8,200 · OtherSalvation Army Harbor HouseOzarks Counseling Center: $8,000 · OtherOzarks Counseling CenterBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE OZARKS: $5,000 · OtherPRAISE ASSEMBLY OF GOD: $4,000 · Other+33 more: $41,200 · Other+33 moreDOGWOOD RANCH CORPORATION: $10,000 · Human ServicesDOGWOOD RANCH CORPORATIONGood Samaritan Boys Ranch: $6,200 · Human ServicesGood Samaritan Boys RanchWHETSTONE BOYS RANCH: $6,000 · Human ServicesWHETSTONE BOYS RANCHPPS FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN IN NEED: $5,300 · Human ServicesPPS FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN IN…Care to Learn: $5,000 · Human ServicesCare to LearnPathways Project Coalition of the Ozarks: $3,700 · Human ServicesPathways Project Coalition …Ozarks Area Community Action Corporation: $2,200 · Human ServicesOZARKS REGIONAL YMCA: $2,000 · Human Services+4 more: $3,500 · Human Services+4 moreHospice Foundation of the Ozarks Inc: $7,500 · HealthHospice Found…CHILDRENS SMILE CENTER CSC: $6,000 · HealthCHILDRENS SMI…Foundation for Springfield Public Schools: $4,426 · HealthFoundation fo…Faith Community Health DBA Hope Counseling Center: $2,500 · HealthFaith Communi…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP OF THE OZARKS INC: $7,500 · Community ImprovementTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $5,000 · Crime & LegalSHILOH SUMMER CAMP INC: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentTRI-LAKES HUMANE SOCIETY: $3,000 · Animals
Other$97,021Human Services$43,900Health$21,426Community Improvement$7,500Crime & Legal$5,000Youth Development$5,000Animals$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDOGWOOD RANCH CORPORATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP OF THE OZARKS INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHospice Foundation of the Ozarks Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetGood Samaritan Boys Ranch: $6,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDRENS SMILE CENTER CSC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPPS FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN IN NEED: $5,300 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetCare to Learn: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHILOH SUMMER CAMP INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFoundation for Springfield Public Schools: $4,426 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPathways Project Coalition of the Ozarks: $3,700 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SPRINGFIELD INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRI-LAKES HUMANE SOCIETY: $3,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetOzarks Area Community Action Corporation: $2,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOZARKS FOOD HARVEST INC: $2,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF SPRINGFIELD INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSILVER DOLLAR CITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARC OF THE OZARKS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY VIOLENCE CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEAST OF THESE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHONOR FLIGHT OF THE OZARKS: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Stanley & Elaine Ball…Community Foundation …The Charlie & Mary Be…Commerce Bancshares F…Arvest FoundationOzarks Health Advocac…Cook Family FoundationStephen & Helen G Sed…Musgrave FoundationThe Hulston Family Fo…Christine & Katharina…Bee Payne-Stewart Fou…
Stanley & Elaine Ball Charitable TrMO41.1× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Stanley & Elaine Ball Charitable Tr · Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · The Charlie & Mary Beth O'Reilly Family Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Arvest Foundation · Ozarks Health Advocacy Foundation · Cook Family Foundation · Stephen & Helen G Sedora Charitable Trust · Musgrave Foundation · The Hulston Family Foundation · Christine & Katharina Pauly Trust · Bee Payne-Stewart Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rick and Marsha Floyd Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rick and Marsha Floyd Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rick and Marsha Floyd’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home