Skip to content

· Private foundation

Richard D Huff Foundation Trust Fd064

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$215k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Animals$336kReligion$227kHuman Services$179kArts & Culture$138kFood & Nutrition$60kYouth Development$50kHousing & Shelter$25kCivil Rights$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $197k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COVENANT BAPTIST CHURCH OF HOUSTON$35,000
Center for Refugees Services$30,000
WINDSYNC$25,000
Hill Country Youth Ranch$25,000
Wildlife Rescue And Rehab Inc$22,168
Three Little Pitties Rescue$20,000
SECOND SERVINGS OF HOUSTON$15,000
SAN ANTONIO PETS ALIVE$15,000
Etosha Rescue & Adoption Center$10,000
DA CAMERA SOCIETY OF TEXAS$7,500
CarePartners$5,000
CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $164k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GOD'S GARAGE INC: $6k → 9%Hill Country Youth Ranch: $25k → 13%Hill Country Youth Ranch: $20k → 13%Hill Country Youth Ranch: $5k → 13%Center for Refugees Services: $30k → 16%Center For Refugee Services: $25k → 16%Center for Refugees Services: $20k → 16%Center For Refugee Services: $15k → 16%Center For Refugee Services: $15k → 16%HOUSTON AREA WOMEN'S CENTER: $3k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$988k · 16 repeat orgs$41k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +83% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
7

Total granted

$988k
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+83%
+11%

Still filing today

69%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsArts & CultureHousing & ShelterEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TL
    THREE LITTLE PITTIES RESCUE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $125k · revenue +206%
  • W
    WINDSYNC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $110k · revenue +46%
  • CF
    Center for Refugee Services
    5× · 2020–2025 · $105k · revenue +204%

Funded once

  • SI
    Sojourners Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -35%
  • BP
    Baptist Peace Fellowship of North
    one grant, 2023 · $7k
  • GG
    Gods Garage Inc
    one grant, 2020 · $6k · revenue +16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Houston Pets Alive

Houston Pets Alive!s (HPA!) mission is to save the lives of at-risk companion cats and dogs and find them loving homes.

Animals
2
Sunnyside Street Dogs I

Community dog rescue focused on saving and rehoming street dogs in Houston.

Animals
3
Pippys Pals Rescue

Pippys Pals Rescue is dedicated to saving the lives of dogs facing euthanasia in Houston. Our mission is to provide a second chance to these beloved companions by rescuing them from shelters, providing them with necessary medical care, and…

Animals
4
Lone Star Pawz

Provide an animal rescue service for abandoned or stray cats and dogs from metro Houston (Harris county) and surrounding counties, such Brazoria and Galveston. The Primary goal is to facilitate their adoption into permanent homes, which…

Animals
5
Poodle Rescue of Houston

Rescue of unwanted dogs

—
6
Houston Cares Animal Rescue

Houston Cares Rescue is a volunteer organization rescuing animals from the streets, and occasionally from shelters, in Houston, TX, and caring for them primarily with foster families until a loving home can be found. We operate a…

Animals
7
Love Them All

We specialize in saving the most at-risk and critical needs dogs facing unnecessary euthanasia in our local shelters. We provide every resource they need to ultimately become adoptable to their perfect forever home.

Animals
8
Chances - Dog Rescue and Relocation

Animal Rescue

—
9
Texas Rescue Inc
Animals
10
Aggieland Humane Society

To provide humane shelter, care and placement for stray and unwanted animals, and to promote the human-animal bond and responsible pet ownership to enhance the quality of life for the people and animals in our community.

Animals
11
Central Texas Spca

Rescue neglected, unwanted homeless dogs and cats nurture and provide shelter until they are placed with a forever family strive to reduce animal overpopulation prevent cruelty to animals teach responsible pet ownership through an outreach…

Animals
12
Community Animal Treatment Center

Community Animal Treatment Center (CATC) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization committed to delivering high-quality, high-volume spay and neuter (HQHVSN) services for community cats and pets, with a focus on supporting low-income…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Haven for Hope of Bexar County; the most unlike its peers is Montrose Grace Place. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
13/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COVENANT BAPTIST CHURCH OF HOUSTON: $177,577 · OtherCOVENANT BAPTIST CHURCH OF HOUSTONWildlife Rescue And Rehab Inc: $113,373 · OtherWildlife Rescue And Rehab IncSECOND SERVINGS OF HOUSTON: $60,000 · OtherSECOND SERVINGS OF HOUSTONALLIANCE OF BAPTISTS INC: $42,000 · OtherALLIANCE OF BAPTISTS INCSEARCH HOMELESS SERVICES: $20,000 · OtherCarePartners: $15,000 · Other+2 more: $16,998 · OtherTHREE LITTLE PITTIES RESCUE: $125,000 · AnimalsTHREE LITTLE PITTIES RES…San Antonio Pets Alive Inc: $40,000 · AnimalsSan Antonio Pets Alive I…Special Pals Inc: $27,209 · AnimalsSpecial Pals IncETOSHA RESCUE & ADOPTION CENTER: $25,000 · AnimalsETOSHA RESCUE & ADOPTION…+1 more: $5,000 · AnimalsCenter for Refugee Services: $105,000 · Human ServicesCenter for Refugee Serv…HILL COUNTRY YOUTH RANCH: $50,000 · Human ServicesHILL COUNTRY YOUTH RANC…Christian Community Service Center Inc: $25,000 · Human ServicesChristian Community Ser…MONTROSE GRACE PLACE: $25,000 · Human ServicesMONTROSE GRACE PLACE+2 more: $9,000 · Human ServicesWINDSYNC: $110,000 · Arts & CultureWINDSYNCDa Camera Society of Texas: $27,500 · Arts & CultureDa Camera Socie…Haven for Hope of Bexar County: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · Education
Other$444,948Animals$222,209Human Services$214,000Arts & Culture$137,500Housing & Shelter$5,000Education$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHREE LITTLE PITTIES RESCUE: $125,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetWINDSYNC: $110,000 over 6y, 8.8% of budgetCenter for Refugee Services: $105,000 over 5y, 8.2% of budgetSECOND SERVINGS OF HOUSTON: $60,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetHILL COUNTRY YOUTH RANCH: $50,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSan Antonio Pets Alive Inc: $40,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetDa Camera Society of Texas: $27,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetSpecial Pals Inc: $27,209 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetETOSHA RESCUE & ADOPTION CENTER: $25,000 over 3y, 4.4% of budgetChristian Community Service Center Inc: $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMONTROSE GRACE PLACE: $25,000 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetSojourners Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGods Garage Inc: $6,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHaven for Hope of Bexar County: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTIGER HAVEN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHouston Area Women's Center: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THREE LITTLE PITTIES RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds WINDSYNC ↗
  • Who funds Center for Refugee Services ↗
  • Who funds SECOND SERVINGS OF HOUSTON ↗
  • Who funds HILL COUNTRY YOUTH RANCH ↗
  • Who funds San Antonio Pets Alive Inc ↗
  • Who funds Da Camera Society of Texas ↗
  • Who funds Special Pals Inc ↗
  • Who funds ETOSHA RESCUE & ADOPTION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Christian Community Service Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds MONTROSE GRACE PLACE ↗
  • Who funds Sojourners Inc ↗
  • Who funds Gods Garage Inc ↗
  • Who funds Haven for Hope of Bexar County ↗
  • Who funds BAYLOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds TIGER HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds Houston Area Women's Center ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Shell USA Company FoundationTX21.9× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Shell USA Company Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Alice Kleberg Reynolds Meyer Foundat A0479800 · Dallas Jewish Community Foundation · San Antonio Area Foundation · Baker Hughes Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Richard D Huff Foundation Trust Fd064 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Richard D Huff Foundation Trust Fd064. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Richard D Huff Foundation Trust Fd064?

    Find your warmest path to Richard D Huff Foundation Trust Fd064 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Richard D Huff Foundation Trust Fd064’s filings →

    More from the funding graph