· Private foundation
Richard D Hannan Family Foundation Fifth
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k59 grants · $87k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $55k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COMMUNITY INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOTHERAPY | $20,000 |
| ARTWORKS | $15,000 |
| OHIO VALLEY VOICES INC | $10,000 |
| CG JUNG INSTITUTE OF SAN FRANCISCO | $10,000 |
| ALLIANCE FOR CATHOLIC URBAN EDUCATION | $7,500 |
| CINCINNATI COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL | $6,000 |
| HEARING SPEECH & DEAF CENTER OF | $5,000 |
| NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC | $5,000 |
| DIRECT RELIEF INTERNATIONAL | $4,000 |
| TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY | $4,000 |
| TRUSTEES OF TUFTS COLLEGE | $3,000 |
| AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION | $3,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| TWIN TOWERS | $2,500 |
| TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
71 repeat relationships — 55 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AOART OPPORTUNITIES INC5× · 2020–2024 · $100k · revenue +187%
- CICOMMUNITY INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOTHERAPY4× · 2021–2024 · $99k · revenue +3%
- OVOHIO VALLEY VOICES5× · 2020–2024 · $50k · revenue +48%
Funded once
- DODIOCESE OF COVINGTONone grant, 2022 · $6k
- CCCINCINNATI COUNTRY DAYone grant, 2020 · $6k
- TCThe Christ Hospital Foundationgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +106%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.
City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…
To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…
Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.
Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cincinnati Museum Association and the most unlike its peers is Mariemont Players Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 53 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
66 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 66 of the 110 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ART OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOTHERAPY ↗
- Who funds OHIO VALLEY VOICES ↗
- Who funds CG JUNG INSTITUTE OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
- Who funds HEARING SPEECH AND DEAF CENTER OF GREA ↗
- Who funds CINCINNATI COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC ↗
- Who funds Cincinnati Youth Collaborative ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds TWIN TOWERS ↗
- Who funds LA SOUPE INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DENISON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Trustees of Tufts College ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds GOLDEN GATE NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL CENTER FOR LGBTQ RIGHTS FKA NATIONAL CENTER FOR LESBIAN RIGHTS ↗
- Who funds ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Cincinnati Union Bethel ↗
- Who funds The Christ Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF CINCINNATI INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds ROTARY FOUNDATION OF CINCINNATI ↗
- Who funds FREESTORE FOODBANK INC ↗
- Who funds OPUS ARCHIVES AND RESEARCH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Cincinnati Public Radio Inc ↗
- Who funds The Christ Hospital ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · The Thomas J Emery Memorial · Louise Taft Semple Foundation · Elsa M Heisel Sule Charitable Trust 2005 · Carol Ann and Ralph V Haile Jr Foundation · The Northern Cincinnai Foundation · Charles H Dater Foundation Inc · Andrew Jergens Foundation · John a Schroth Family Char Tr · Ge Aerospace Foundation · The Alpaugh Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Richard D Hannan Family Foundation Fifth funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.