Skip to content

· Private foundation

Richard B Sneed Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$269k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$253k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$484kEducation$183kReligion$42kPhilanthropy$25kHealth$25kHuman Services$8kInternational$4kRecreation & Sports$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $16k
  • $250k+1 grant · $253k
$3,283
Median grant
1
States reached
$627k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Cleveland Orchestra$252,880
The Cleveland Orchestra$6,591
The Cleveland Orchestra$3,283
The Ohio State University$3,000
Pickaway Co Community Fndn$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Polk Fndn: $4k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
OH
PA
MO
KY
VA
MD
NC
SC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$692k · 19 repeat orgs$98k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
21

Total granted

$692k
$98k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+20%

Still filing today

63%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureReligionAnimalsHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    The Musical Arts Association
    4× · 2020–2025 · $381k · revenue +45%
  • OS
    OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    3× · 2020–2023 · $62k · revenue +3%
  • CO
    CHURCH OF THE SAVIOUR FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $34k · revenue +196%

Funded once

  • OF
    OSU Foundation
    one grant, 2021 · $26k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $20k
  • SB
    Sarasota Ballet of Florida Incgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +76%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
2
Capital University

Capital university transforms lives by empowering an inclusive community of learners through engaging academic, co-curricular, and professional experiences.

Education
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
5
Loyola University

Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…

Education
6
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
7
St Mary's University

St. marys university, as a catholic marianist university, fosters the formation of people in faith and educates leaders for the common good through community, integrated liberal arts and professional education, and academic excellence.

—
8
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
9
St Francis College

St. francis college is an independent, coeducational institution of higher education chartered by an act of the regents of the university of the state of new york on april 10, 1957.

Education
10
The University of Toledo Foundation

The mission of the university of toledo foundation is to secure the future for the university of toledo, through prudent asset management and philanthropy. we build strong linkages between alumni and the university, fostering a spirit of…

Education
11
Syracuse University

Organization's missionas a university with the capacity to attract and engage the best scholars from around the world, yet small enough to support a personalized and academically rigorous student experience, syracuse university faculty and…

Education
12
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Marine Toys for Tots Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
14/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Musical Arts Association: $380,754 · Arts & CultureThe Musical Arts AssociationGETTYSBURG FOUNDATION: $23,000 · Arts & CultureAmerican Battlefield Trust: $23,000 · Arts & CultureSARASOTA CONCERT ASSOCIATION INC: $16,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $15,000 · Arts & CultureCHURCH OF THE SAVIOUR FOUNDATION: $34,000 · OtherCHURCH OF THE SAVIOUR FOUNDATIO…Individual grant recipient: $33,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientOSU Foundation: $26,000 · OtherOSU FoundationThe Ohio State University: $22,000 · OtherThe Ohio State UniversityIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPickaway Co Community Fndn: $17,000 · OtherPickaway Co Community FndnZeta Phi Foundation: $11,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $10,500 · OtherA Lincoln Presidential Library Fndn: $10,000 · Other+14 more: $34,500 · Other+14 moreOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $62,000 · EducationOHIO STATE UNI…KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FOUNDATION: $24,500 · EducationKAPPA KAPPA GA…LAUREL SCHOOL: $4,000 · Education+4 more: $9,500 · Education+4 morePOLK FOUNDATION: $4,000 · Human ServicesSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $4,000 · ReligionCOLUMBUS HUMANE: $3,500 · AnimalsMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Philanthropy
Arts & Culture$457,754Other$218,500Education$100,000Human Services$4,000Religion$4,000Animals$3,500Philanthropy$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Musical Arts Association: $380,754 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $62,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHURCH OF THE SAVIOUR FOUNDATION: $34,000 over 5y, 2.7% of budgetKAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FOUNDATION: $24,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetGETTYSBURG FOUNDATION: $23,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Battlefield Trust: $23,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSARASOTA CONCERT ASSOCIATION INC: $16,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetSarasota Ballet of Florida Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetColonial Williamsburg Foundation: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOALITION FOR CHRISTIAN OUTREACH: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPOLK FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLAUREL SCHOOL: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOLUMBUS HUMANE: $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetZeta Phi Society Foundation Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetUniversity of Dayton: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFURMAN UNIVERSITY: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSantas Silent Helpers of Columbus Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCIRCLEVILLE CITY SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Musical Arts Association ↗
  • Who funds OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHURCH OF THE SAVIOUR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GETTYSBURG FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American Battlefield Trust ↗
  • Who funds SARASOTA CONCERT ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Sarasota Ballet of Florida Inc ↗
  • Who funds Colonial Williamsburg Foundation ↗
  • Who funds COALITION FOR CHRISTIAN OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds POLK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds LAUREL SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBUS HUMANE ↗
  • Who funds Zeta Phi Society Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds University of Dayton ↗
  • Who funds FURMAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Santas Silent Helpers of Columbus Inc ↗
  • Who funds CIRCLEVILLE CITY SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Columbus FoundationOH14.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Columbus Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Richard B Sneed Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Richard B Sneed Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Richard B Sneed’s filings →

    More from the funding graph