Skip to content
Rich Junior E & Blanche B Fdn at a glance

· Private foundation

Rich Junior E & Blanche B Fdn

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$31k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$54kFood & Nutrition$24kHealth$22kRecreation & Sports$15kEnvironment$13kHuman Services$12kArts & Culture$12kPhilanthropy$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$426k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OGDEN SCHOOL FOUNDATION$5,500
WEBER STATE UNIVERSITY$3,000
EDEN VALLEY TRAIL TRUST$2,500
TRAILS FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN UTAH$2,000
INTERMOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC$2,000
UTAH FOOD BANK$2,000
MIDTOWN COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC$2,000
BOX ELDER COMMUNITY PANTRY$1,500
GREATER OGDEN COMMUNITY NATURE CTR$1,500
BONNEVILLE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$1,000
OGDEN VALLEY LAND TRUST INC$1,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$1,000
MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF UTAH INC$1,000
WEBER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION$1,000
NATIONAL CENTER ON SHAKEN BABY SYNDROME$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%OGDEN WEBER COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $2k → 9%OGDEN RESCUE MISSION INC: $1k → 9%OGDEN RESCUE MISSION INC: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$157k · 23 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against -5% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
6

Total granted

$157k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
-5%

Still filing today

78%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyEducationAnimalsHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OS
    OGDEN SCHOOL FOUNDATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $25k · revenue +69%
  • UF
    UTAH FOOD BANK
    8× · 2018–2025 · $16k · revenue +95%
  • MC
    Midtown Community Health Center Inc
    5× · 2020–2025 · $10k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • NU
    NORTHERN UTAH TRAILS ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • OC
    OGDEN-WEBER COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue -7%
  • IH
    IHC HEALTH SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +22%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Utah Geological Foundation
—
2
Utah Public Lands Alliance
Education
3
Ogden Family Foundation
Education
4
Northern Utah Cancer Foundation
—
5
Utah Motorsports Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Utah Shakespeare Festival Foundation
Arts & Culture
7
University of Utah Foundation

Provide support to the University of Utah Growth Capital Partners Foundation in Charitable, Educational and Scientific purposes.

Philanthropy
8
Utah Wild Sheep Foundation

To secure and maintain habitat for the northern american wild sheep to benefit of hunters and non hunters hunters

Animals
9
Economic Development Corporation of Utah Foundation

To serve as a catalyst for quality job growth and increased capital investment in the state.

Community Improvement
10
Sci Utah Foundation

To ensure the future of wildlife through conservation, education and hunting.

Animals
11
Autism Foundation of Utah
Health
12
Utah Land Use Institute

To assist governmental units, developers and the public with land use issues.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Utah Inc; the most unlike its peers is Wayne Julien Torrie Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
12/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UTAH FOOD BANK: $15,500 · OtherUTAH FOOD BANKWEBER STATE UNIVERSITY: $13,800 · OtherWEBER STATE UNIVERSITYBOX ELDER COMMUNITY PANTRY: $8,750 · OtherBOX ELDER COMMUNITY PANTRYTHE SALVATION ARMY OF OGDEN: $7,800 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY OF OGDENTRAILS FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN UTAH: $6,500 · OtherTRAILS FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN UTAHUNION STATION FOUNDATION: $4,600 · OtherUNION STATION FOUNDATIONMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF UTAH INC: $4,000 · OtherRESCUE MISSION OF SALT LAKE INC: $4,000 · OtherWEBER PATHWAYS: $4,000 · Other+8 more: $13,500 · Other+8 moreOGDEN SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $24,700 · EducationOGDEN SCHOOL FOUNDATI…Weber County School District Foundation: $7,400 · EducationWeber County School D…Midtown Community Health Center Inc: $9,500 · HealthMidtown Com…SEAGER MEMORIAL CLINIC: $3,500 · HealthSEAGER MEMO…INTERMOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $3,500 · HealthINTERMOUNTA…IHC HEALTH SERVICES INC: $1,000 · HealthIHC HEALTH …BONNEVILLE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $5,875 · PhilanthropyBONNEVILL…NATIONAL CENTER ON SHAKEN BABY SYNDROME: $4,500 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL …WAYNE JULIEN TORRIE FOUNDATION: $3,000 · PhilanthropyWAYNE JUL…GREATER OGDEN COMMUNITY NATURE CTR: $7,200 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF UTAH: $1,000 · AnimalsECCLES COMMUNITY ART CENTER: $7,000 · Arts & CultureOGDEN VALLEY LAND TRUST INC: $5,500 · Environment
Other$82,450Education$32,100Health$17,500Philanthropy$13,375Animals$8,200Arts & Culture$7,000Environment$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOGDEN SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $24,700 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetUTAH FOOD BANK: $15,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMidtown Community Health Center Inc: $9,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBOX ELDER COMMUNITY PANTRY: $8,750 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetWeber County School District Foundation: $7,400 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER OGDEN COMMUNITY NATURE CTR: $7,200 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetECCLES COMMUNITY ART CENTER: $7,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetBONNEVILLE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $5,875 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetOGDEN VALLEY LAND TRUST INC: $5,500 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetUNION STATION FOUNDATION: $4,600 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER ON SHAKEN BABY SYNDROME: $4,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF UTAH INC: $4,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRESCUE MISSION OF SALT LAKE INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWEBER PATHWAYS: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSEAGER MEMORIAL CLINIC: $3,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetINTERMOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEDEN VALLEY TRAIL TRUST: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetST ANNE'S CENTER: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOGDEN-WEBER COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIHC HEALTH SERVICES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF UTAH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OGDEN SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UTAH FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Midtown Community Health Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds BOX ELDER COMMUNITY PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds Weber County School District Foundation ↗
  • Who funds GREATER OGDEN COMMUNITY NATURE CTR ↗
  • Who funds ECCLES COMMUNITY ART CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BONNEVILLE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OGDEN VALLEY LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds UNION STATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL CENTER ON SHAKEN BABY SYNDROME ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF UTAH INC ↗
  • Who funds RESCUE MISSION OF SALT LAKE INC ↗
  • Who funds WEBER PATHWAYS ↗
  • Who funds SEAGER MEMORIAL CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds INTERMOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WAYNE JULIEN TORRIE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EDEN VALLEY TRAIL TRUST ↗
  • Who funds ST ANNE'S CENTER ↗
  • Who funds OGDEN-WEBER COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds IHC HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF UTAH ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Alan and Jeanne H…Lawrence & Janet Dee …Douglas & Shelley Fel…Nebeker Family Founda…Willard L Eccles Char…Sorenson Legacy Found…Msl Family FoundationBeaver Creek Foundati…Donnell B & Elizabeth…C Scott & Dorothy E W…The Community Foundat…Wadman Foundation
The Alan and Jeanne Hall FoundationUT24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Alan and Jeanne Hall Foundation · Lawrence & Janet Dee Foundation · Douglas & Shelley Felt Family Found · Nebeker Family Foundation · Willard L Eccles Charitable Foundation · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · Msl Family Foundation · Beaver Creek Foundation · Donnell B & Elizabeth D Stewart Education Foundation · C Scott & Dorothy E Watkins Charitable Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · Wadman Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rich Junior E & Blanche B Fdn funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rich Junior E & Blanche B Fdn. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rich Junior E & Blanche B Fdn’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home