· Private foundation
Rice Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $13k
- $10k–50k36 grants · $665k
- $50k–250k16 grants · $1.6M
- $250k+4 grants · $1.7M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $600,000 |
| Gigi's Playhouse | $500,000 |
| Marine Military Academy | $350,000 |
| Max McGraw Wildlife Foundation | $250,000 |
| Chicago Botanic Garden | $177,500 |
| Operation North Pole | $150,000 |
| North Shore Center the Performing A | $130,000 |
| Illinois Conservation Foundation | $130,000 |
| Ducks Unlimited Inc | $125,000 |
| Medicine Fish | $100,000 |
| The Nature Conservancy in Illinois | $100,000 |
| Morton Arboretum | $100,000 |
| By the Hand Club for KidsFormerly K | $100,000 |
| Lincoln Park Zoo | $100,000 |
| Mobile Care Chicago | $100,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.
111 repeat relationships — 53 still active in FY2024, 58 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $290k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CHCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY8× · 2017–2024 · $3.2M · revenue +37%
- GVGLEN VIEW CLUB SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION7× · 2017–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +99% · 66% of their budget
- MMMARINE MILITARY ACADEMY INC8× · 2017–2024 · $1.7M · revenue +20%
Funded once
- RIRehabilitation Institute of Chicagograduatedone grant, 2017 · $1.0M · revenue +31%
- FMFIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORYone grant, 2021 · $1.0M · revenue +22%
- MHMISERICORDIA HOMEgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $250k · revenue +33%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The chicago psychoanalytic institute transforms the lives of individuals, families and communities, using psychoanalytic knowledge to help them grow and thrive.
The Chicago School educates the next generation of change-makers in innovative theory and culturally competent practice to strengthen the integrated health of individuals, organizations, and communities.
Chh honors every person's right to a home and health care, by bridging the housing and health care systems, to improve the lives of chicagoans experiencing homelessness.
Infant welfare society of chicago (iws) (d/b/a iws family health) provides quality medical, dental and behavioral health services for the health, physical and mental development of children and their families in the chicagoland community.
A better chicago is changing how chicago fights poverty by investing in bold ideas that create opportunity for our youth.
Executive Service Corps is the premier nonprofit consultancy that engages highly skilled professionals who use their experience and expertise to provide nonprofits with the consulting services they need to be successful. Our vision is to…
The chicago children's advocacy center unites public, private, and community partners to ensure the safety, health, and well-being of abused children.
To provide high-quality early learning and out-of-school time enrichment in under-resourced neighborhoods to holistically support children of all ages, their families, and their communities.
To enhance the quality of life for children and families by inspiring hope and empowerment and growth within all whom we serve.
Child Link provides foster care, family counseling, and therapy services to Chicago area adolescents who are at risk of homelessness. Child Link also refers adolescents to other agencies that are able to provide additional resources and…
To Prepare Students for Success in Four-Year Colleges.
To Provide counseling, crisis intervention, case management, psychosocial rehabilitative and vocational services to mentally ill and substance abuse clients in outpatient and community based settings.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Connections for the Homeless Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Driven Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
92 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 92 of the 153 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds GLEN VIEW CLUB SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MARINE MILITARY ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds Rush University Medical Center ↗
- Who funds Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago ↗
- Who funds FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY ↗
- Who funds Operation North Pole Inc ↗
- Who funds Illinois Conservation Foundation ↗
- Who funds Max McGraw Wildlife Foundation ↗
- Who funds LINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds THE MORTON ARBORETUM ↗
- Who funds Equestrian Connection NFP ↗
- Who funds HOWARD YOUNG FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MISERICORDIA HOME ↗
- Who funds PAWS CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds NOURISHING HOPE ↗
- Who funds Chicago Zoological Society ↗
- Who funds TOUCHED BY AN ANIMAL ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds Delta Waterfowl Foundation ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds Young Mens Christian Assoc McGaw Inc ↗
- Who funds CAMP MANITO-WISH YMCA INC ↗
- Who funds Midtown-Metro Achievement Centers ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: George M Eisenberg Foundation for Charities · The Chicago Community Trust · Helen V Brach Foundation · Dr Scholl Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · The a Montgomery Ward Foundation · WP & HB White Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · The Service Club of Chicago · Evanston Community Foundation · Edmond and Alice Opler Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Rice Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Rice Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Rice Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.