Skip to content

· Public charity

Rice County Area United Way

RICE COUNTY AREA UNITED WAY works to mobilize the resources and caring power of individuals, organizations, and networks to strengthen the community.

$264k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$61k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$897kArts & Culture$434kYouth Development$326kHealth$137kHousing & Shelter$59kEducation$27kFood & Nutrition$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $210,612, the rows itemized in this filing. The $263,812 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $53,200 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $58k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $115k
$11,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$460k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHFIELD COMMUNITY ACTION CENTER$61,000
IMAGINATION LIBRARY$54,112
HOPE CENTER$12,000
HEALTHY COMMUNITY INITIATIVE$12,000
HEALTHFINDERS$12,000
FARIBAULT YOUTH INVESTMENT$11,500
SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL$10,000
TORCH$9,000
NORTHFIELD PUBLIC SCHOOLS$9,000
THREE RIVERS COMMUNITY ACTION$7,000
NORTHFIELD UNION OF YOUTH$7,000
RUTH'S HOUSE OF HOPE$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $839k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%NORTHFIELD COMMUNITY ACTION CENTER: $109k → 11%NORTHFIELD COMMUNITY ACTION CENTER: $108k → 11%NORTHFIELD COMMUNITY ACTION CENTER: $107k → 11%NORTHFIELD COMMUNITY ACTION CENTER: $100k → 11%NORTHFIELD COMMUNITY ACTION CENTER: $97k → 11%NORTHFIELD COMMUNITY ACTION CENTER: $81k → 11%NORTHFIELD COMMUNITY ACTION CENTER: $61k → 11%NORTHFIELD COMMUNITY ACTION CENTER: $61k → 11%HOPE CENTER: $23k → 11%HOPE CENTER: $21k → 11%HOPE CENTER: $18k → 11%HOPE CENTER: $18k → 11%HOPE CENTER: $13k → 11%HOPE CENTER: $12k → 11%HOPE CENTER: $12k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 12 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +90% since the first grant, against -24% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
4

Total granted

$1.9M
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+90%
-24%

Still filing today

67%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementHealthRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    COMMUNITY ACTION CENTER INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $723k · revenue +315%
  • NH
    NORTHFIELD HEALTHY COMMUNITY INITIATIVE
    8× · 2017–2025 · $180k · revenue +276%
  • HC
    HealthFinders Collaborative Inc
    8× · 2017–2025 · $126k · revenue +225%

Funded once

  • SM
    SERVE MNREADING CORPS
    one grant, 2023 · $9k
  • PF
    Project Friendship Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $7k · revenue -24%
  • PA
    PROJECT ABLE
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hope 4 Youth

To provide pathways to end youth homelessness.

Youth Development
2
Mi Casa Mn

We are dedicated to promoting and enhancing healthy lifestyles by raising awareness about mental health, encouraging healthy eating habits, and promoting an active lifestyle in our communities.

Human Services
3
Care in Action Minnesota

Our mission is to enhance the quality of life of children who have experienced abuse or neglect, strengthen families and prevent childhood maltreatment, by providing timely crucial support that meets the basic needs of local families and…

Human Services
4
Hope-Net Ministries Inc

Helping Other People Experience HOPE through meeting felt needs and building healthy relationships.

Human Services
5
Richfield Community Center
—
6
Mercy House Minneapolis
Human Services
7
Minnesota Acts Now

Crime and communities violence interve

Crime & Legal
8
Rutland County Housing Coalition

The homeless prevention center empowers individuals and families using evidence-based practice, to prevent homelessness, or rehouse those experiencing homelessness, by offering hope, one person and one family at a time.

Education
9
North Central Kansas Housing Opportunities Inc
Community Improvement
10
House of Hope

We assist young mothers with housing and wrap around services.

Human Services
11
Making Opportunity Count Inc

Moc's mission is to empower families to achieve economic security by eliminating barriers and creating opportunities.

Human Services
12
Opport-Unity

We provide low income housing

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Three Rivers Community Action Inc; the most unlike its peers is Project Friendship Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY ACTION CENTER INC: $723,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACTION CENTER INCHOPE CENTER: $115,700 · Human ServicesHOPE CENTERIMAGINATION LIBRARY: $226,544 · OtherIMAGINATION LIBRARYNORTHFIELD PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $219,410 · OtherNORTHFIELD PUBLIC SCHOOLSFARIBAULT YOUTH INVESTMENT: $53,647 · OtherFARIBAULT YOUTH INVESTMENTSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $30,000 · OtherTHREE RIVERS COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $28,000 · Other+4 more: $26,850 · OtherNORTHFIELD HEALTHY COMMUNITY INITIATIVE: $179,800 · Community ImprovementNORTHFIELD…HealthFinders Collaborative Inc: $125,600 · HealthNORTHFIELD UNION OF YOUTH: $86,450 · Recreation & SportsRUTH'S HOUSE OF HOPE: $53,300 · Housing & ShelterRice County Neighbors United: $24,000 · Education
Human Services$838,700Other$584,451Community Improvement$179,800Health$125,600Recreation & Sports$86,450Housing & Shelter$53,300Education$24,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION CENTER INC: $723,000 over 8y, 10% of budgetNORTHFIELD HEALTHY COMMUNITY INITIATIVE: $179,800 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetHealthFinders Collaborative Inc: $125,600 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetHOPE CENTER: $115,700 over 7y, 5.5% of budgetNORTHFIELD UNION OF YOUTH: $86,450 over 8y, 4.1% of budgetRUTH'S HOUSE OF HOPE: $53,300 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetTHREE RIVERS COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $28,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRice County Neighbors United: $24,000 over 3y, 24% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHFIELD HEALTHY COMMUNITY INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds HealthFinders Collaborative Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOPE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NORTHFIELD UNION OF YOUTH ↗
  • Who funds RUTH'S HOUSE OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds THREE RIVERS COMMUNITY ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds Rice County Neighbors United ↗
  • Who funds Project Friendship Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Saint Paul & Minnesota FoundationMN20.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Northfield Shares · Youthprise · Mardag Foundation · Southern Minnesota Initiative Foundation · Minnesota Community Foundation · Allina Health System · The American Center for Philanthropy Inc · Medica Foundation · Edina Realty Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rice County Area United Way funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rice County Area United Way. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rice County Area United Way’s filings →

    More from the funding graph