Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Northfield Shares

NORTHFIELD SHARES seeks to sustain and transform the northfield community by advancing philanthropy, inspiring volunteerism and promoting collaborative leadership.

$1.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$137k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$2.8MReligion$679kInternational$499kHuman Services$360kYouth Development$206kArts & Culture$189kEnvironment$87kPhilanthropy$82kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 16 grants below total $829,165 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,049,325 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $220,160 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $141k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $671k
$24,329
Median grant
5
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHFIELD UNITED METHODIST$137,100
CARLETON COLLEGE$137,100
WOOSTER COLLEGE$137,100
CENTER FOR COURAGE & RENEWAL$110,000
EASTMAN SCHOOL OF MUSIC$82,260
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA$67,038
NORTHFIELD HEALTHY COMMUNITY INITIATIVE$34,086
COMMUNITY ACTION CENTER$24,329
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES$20,800
ST JOHN'S LUTHERAN CHURCH$14,000
GREAT RIVER SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL$13,600
WOMEN IN NORTHFIELD GIVING SUPPORT (WINGS)$12,101
FIFTY NORTH$12,101
OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL$10,000
CLEAN RIVER PARTNERS$9,550
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $165k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%COMMUNITY ACTION CENTER: $29k → 11%COMMUNITY ACTION CENTER: $25k → 11%COMMUNITY ACTION CENTER: $24k → 11%COMMUNITY ACTION CENTER: $24k → 11%NORTHFIELD AREA YMCA: $13k → 11%COMMUNITY ACTION CENTER: $12k → 11%COMMUNITY ACTION CENTER: $8k → 11%COMMUNITY ACTION CENTER: $8k → 11%NORTHFIELD AREA YMCA: $7k → 11%COMMUNITY ACTION CENTER: $6k → 11%NORTHFIELD YOUTH SPORTS COLLABORATI: $5k → 11%COMMUNITY ACTION CENTER: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

57%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.9M · 14 repeat orgs$2.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +59% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
17

Total granted

$2.9M
$1.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+1%

Still filing today

86%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $462k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesEnvironmentPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CARLETON COLLEGE
    5× · 2017–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +39%
  • SO
    ST OLAF COLLEGE
    2× · 2021–2023 · $510k · revenue +38%
  • NS
    Northfield Senior Citizens Inc FiftyNorth
    8× · 2017–2024 · $242k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ASIAN RURAL INSTITUTE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $489k · revenue +33%
  • DU
    DOANE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2021 · $489k · revenue +1%
  • FU
    FIRST UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST
    one grant, 2021 · $489k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northland Foundation

The northland foundation supports northeastern minnesota people and communities working toward a future where everyone feels they belong and can thrive.

Philanthropy
2
The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education
3
United Way of Ne Minnesota

United way of northeastern minnesota invests in nonprofits, programs, and collaborations that equip and empower, creating opportunities for people to thrive in our communities.

4
Northland College

Northland college's mission is to integrate undergraduate liberal arts studies with an environmental emphasis, enabling those it serves to address the challenges of the future.

Education
5
North Central University

North central university is a christian university with a commitment to academic excellence.

Education
6
University of Minnesota Foundation Investment Advisors

To provide the highest level of stewardship for university donors through professional management and oversight of the university of minnesota foundation's assets by creating a focused investment environment with clarity of purpose,…

Education
7
Second Harvest North Central Food Bank

Engaging the community to end hunger

8
Cornell College

Cornell college offers an innovative and rigorous learning community where faculty and staff collaborate with students to develop the intellectual curiosity, creativity and moral courage necessary for a lifetime of learning and engaged…

Education
9
Minnesota Council on Foundations

MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.

10
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
11
Nebraska Wesleyan University

Nebraska wesleyan university is an academic community dedicated to intellectual and personal growth within the context of a liberal arts education and in an environment of christian concern.

Education
12
New North Inc

To be the catalyst for regional prosperity for all through collaborative action.

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northfield Healthy Community Initiative and the most unlike its peers is Rice County Neighbors United. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyMember-Based Community Orga…Faith-Based Global Ministri…Disability Services and Emp…Arts & Cultural Organizatio…Senior Residential CareSenior Residential Care
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr14%4%5–10yr20%11%10–20yr18%32%20–35yr15%32%35–55yr13%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr20%4%10–20yr18%9%20–35yr15%24%35–55yr13%62%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/35
the rest of the field
15%
1,495/9,942

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/28
Grantees still filing
19/28
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CARLETON COLLEGE — $1,363,640 · EducationCARLETON COLLEGEST OLAF COLLEGE — $510,090 · EducationST OLAF COLLEGEDOANE UNIVERSITY — $488,579 · EducationDOANE UNIVERSITYCENTER FOR COURAGE & RENEWAL — $150,000 · EducationCENTER FOR COURAGE & RENEWALTHE COLLEGE OF WOOSTER — $137,100 · Education+2 more — $96,038 · EducationAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ASIAN RURAL INSTITUTE INC — $488,579 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ASIAN RURAL INSTITU…FIRST UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST — $488,579 · OtherFIRST UNITED CHURCH OF CHRISTNorthfield Senior Citizens Inc FiftyNorth — $241,797 · OtherNorthfield Senior Citizens Inc FiftyNor…NORTHFIELD UNITED METHODIST — $137,100 · OtherNORTHFIELD UNITED METHODISTEASTMAN SCHOOL OF MUSIC — $82,260 · OtherMINNESOTA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $69,397 · Other+15 more — $257,958 · Other+15 moreNORTHFIELD HEALTHY COMMUNITY INITIATIVE — $169,589 · Community ImprovementROTARY CLUB OF NORTHFIELD — $50,000 · Community ImprovementSHARING OUR ROOTS — $8,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY ACTION CENTER INC — $145,371 · Human ServicesNORTHFIELD AREA FAMILY YMCA — $19,680 · Human ServicesGREAT RIVER SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL — $54,400 · Arts & CultureNORTHFIELD ARTS GUILD — $21,000 · Arts & CultureVALLEY GROVE PRESERVATION SOCIETY — $16,500 · Arts & CultureFILMNORTH — $8,000 · Arts & CultureDEFEAT OF JESSE JAMES DAYS COMMITTEE INC — $7,000 · Arts & CultureHealthFinders Collaborative Inc — $51,500 · HealthCLEAN RIVER PARTNERS INC — $34,850 · Environment
Education$2,745,447Other$1,765,670Community Improvement$227,589Human Services$165,051Arts & Culture$106,900Health$51,500Environment$34,850

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCARLETON COLLEGE — $1,363,640 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetST OLAF COLLEGE — $510,090 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDOANE UNIVERSITY — $488,579 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNorthfield Senior Citizens Inc FiftyNorth — $241,797 over 8y, 9.6% of budgetNORTHFIELD HEALTHY COMMUNITY INITIATIVE — $169,589 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetCENTER FOR COURAGE & RENEWAL — $150,000 over 5y, 12% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION CENTER INC — $145,371 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetTHE COLLEGE OF WOOSTER — $137,100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMINNESOTA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $69,397 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION — $67,038 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREAT RIVER SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL — $54,400 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetHealthFinders Collaborative Inc — $51,500 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF NORTHFIELD — $50,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetCLEAN RIVER PARTNERS INC — $34,850 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetNORTHFIELD ARTS GUILD — $21,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetNORTHFIELD AREA FAMILY YMCA — $19,680 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetNORTHFIELD SOCCER ASSOCIATION — $15,500 over 1y, 50% of budgetProject Friendship Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetOPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMATTER — $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHARING OUR ROOTS — $8,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFILMNORTH — $8,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetDEFEAT OF JESSE JAMES DAYS COMMITTEE INC — $7,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetNORTHFIELD SHARES — $6,800 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Minneapolis FoundationMN25.7× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · The American Center for Philanthropy Inc · Minnesota Community Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Rice County Area United Way · Youthprise · Southern Minnesota Initiative Foundation · Southeastern Minnesota Arts Council Inc · Allina Health System · The McKnight Foundation · Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing · Otto Bremer Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Northfield Shares funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph