Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rhett Butler Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$542k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$411kHealth$275kHuman Services$111kAnimals$71kFood & Nutrition$63kCrime & Legal$50kPhilanthropy$28kCommunity Improvement$26kOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $376k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $160k
$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$19M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SPECIAL PALS$60,000
BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE$50,000
THE BROOKWOOD COMMUNITY$50,000
FORT BEND'S WOMENS CENTER$40,000
LEAKEY ISD$36,000
SMALL STEPS$35,000
JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER$35,000
AID TO VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC ABUSE$35,000
RETINA RESEARCH CENTER$30,000
HOUSTON FOOD BANK$30,000
IEDUCATE USA$25,000
JUSTICE FORWARD$25,000
RUPANI FOUNDATION USA$25,000
CHILD ADVOCATES OF FORT BEND$25,000
DAYA INC$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $61k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%Viola's Huge Heart Foundation: $250 → 16%AID TO VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC ABUSE: $35k → 16%JUSTICE FORWARD: $25k → 16%AID TO VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC ABUSE: $500 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$601k · 10 repeat orgs$443k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +76% since the first grant, against +37% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
18

Total granted

$601k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+76%
+37%

Still filing today

60%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 20% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $434k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’24
EducationHealthHuman ServicesAnimalsCommunity ImprovementRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    Texas Children's Hospital
    6× · 2017–2024 · $114k · revenue +105%
  • RR
    RETINA RESEARCH FOUNDATION
    5× · 2017–2021 · $80k · revenue +76%
  • A
    AVDA
    3× · 2017–2024 · $36k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • LV
    Leakey Volunteer Fire Department Incgraduated
    2× · 2017–2018 · $3k · revenue +37%
  • TA
    Texas A&M Foundationgraduated
    2× · 2017–2018 · $1k · revenue +90%
  • FC
    FRIO CANYON EMS INCgraduated
    2× · 2017–2018 · $750 · revenue +317%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Childrens Advocacy Center of Van Zandt County Inc

The children's advocacy center of van zandt county is committed to ensuring quality services and support to those children impacted by abuse while also building a future where no child in van zandt county experiences abuse.

Human Services
2
Family Service Center of Houston and Harris County

The mission of Family Service Center of Houston and Harris County (Family Houston) is to create a stronger community for tomorrow by helping individuals and families meet the challenges they face today. We help others help themselves.

Human Services
3
Houston Zoo Inc

Mission: Connect communities with animals, inspiring action to save wildlife. Vision: Be a leader in the global movement to save wildlife. (Continued on Schedule O) Houston Zoo, Inc. (HZI) strives to be a zoo that practices exemplary…

Animals
4
Harris County Medical Society

Our mission is to be the leading advocate for our member physicians, their patients and our community, in promoting the highest standards of ethical medical practice, access to quality medical care, medical education, research, and…

—
5
Houston Pets Alive

Houston Pets Alive!s (HPA!) mission is to save the lives of at-risk companion cats and dogs and find them loving homes.

Animals
6
Spca of Texas

The spca of texas is dedicated to providing every animal exceptional care and a loving home.

Animals
7
Texas Hospital Association

The texas hospital association's mission is to provide leadership in advocacy, information and education to enable texas hospitals to deliver superior, cost effective care which enhances the health care of individuals and their communities.

Health
8
Houston Cares Animal Rescue

Houston Cares Rescue is a volunteer organization rescuing animals from the streets, and occasionally from shelters, in Houston, TX, and caring for them primarily with foster families until a loving home can be found. We operate a…

Animals
9
Houston Hospice

Houston Hospice provides uncompromising, compassionate end-of-life care to patients and families in our community. Houston Hospice cares for patients from all races, ethnicities, religious beliefs, and payor classes, including those with…

—
10
Children's Hospital Association of Texas

To advance children's health and well-being by advocating for policies and funding that promote children's access to high-quality, comprehensive health care.

—
11
Children's Advocacy Centers of Texas Inc

Children's advocacy centers of texas, inc. (cactx) is the statewide organization for its 70 children's advocacy centers (cac's) across texas. cactx leads efforts, in partnership with investigatory and prosecution agencies, to pursue…

Crime & Legal
12
Texas Community Counseling

When care is within reach, lives change. Texas Community Counseling is a faith-based nonprofit committed to bringing hope and healing through mental health care to the communities that need it the most. We empower individuals to heal,…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Houston Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Frio Canyon Ems Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/24
Grantees still filing
16/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LEAKEY ISD: $290,500 · OtherLEAKEY ISDFORT BEND'S WOMENS CENTER: $40,000 · OtherFORT BEND'S WOMENS CENTERRETINA RESEARCH CENTER: $30,000 · OtherRETINA RESEARCH CENTERThe Houston Food Bank: $30,000 · OtherThe Houston Food BankRUPANI FOUNDATION USA: $25,000 · OtherDaya Inc: $25,000 · OtherFt Bend County Child Advocates Inc: $25,000 · Other+19 more: $35,575 · Other+19 moreTexas Children's Hospital: $114,499 · HealthTexas Children's Hosp…RETINA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $80,000 · HealthRETINA RESEARCH FOUND…+1 more: $750 · HealthThe Brookwood Community Inc: $50,000 · EducationThe Brookwood Com…Baylor College of Medicine: $50,000 · EducationBaylor College of…Small Steps Nurturing Center: $35,000 · EducationSmall Steps Nurtu…iEDUCATE: $26,000 · EducationiEDUCATE+1 more: $1,000 · EducationSpecial Pals Inc: $60,000 · Animals+2 more: $2,400 · AnimalsAVDA: $35,500 · Human ServicesJUSTICE FORWARD: $25,000 · Human Services+1 more: $250 · Human ServicesJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF DALLAS: $35,000 · Recreation & Sports+1 more: $250 · Recreation & SportsAMERICAN JUNIOR BRAHMAN ASSOCIATION: $30,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$501,075Health$195,249Education$162,000Animals$62,400Human Services$60,750Recreation & Sports$35,250Food & Nutrition$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTexas Children's Hospital: $114,499 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRETINA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $80,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetSpecial Pals Inc: $60,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetThe Brookwood Community Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAVDA: $35,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF DALLAS: $35,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSmall Steps Nurturing Center: $35,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetiEDUCATE: $26,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetJUSTICE FORWARD: $25,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetDaya Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTREE OF PROMISE: $7,950 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetLeakey Volunteer Fire Department Inc: $2,500 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetGREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSTON SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $1,900 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTexas A&M Foundation: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIO CANYON EMS INC: $750 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetHOUSTON HUMANE SOCIETY: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE LIBRARY ASSOCIATION: $250 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Texas Children's Hospital ↗
  • Who funds RETINA RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Special Pals Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Brookwood Community Inc ↗
  • Who funds Baylor College of Medicine ↗
  • Who funds AVDA ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF DALLAS ↗
  • Who funds Small Steps Nurturing Center ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JUNIOR BRAHMAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds The Houston Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds iEDUCATE ↗
  • Who funds JUSTICE FORWARD ↗
  • Who funds Ft Bend County Child Advocates Inc ↗
  • Who funds Daya Inc ↗
  • Who funds TREE OF PROMISE ↗
  • Who funds Leakey Volunteer Fire Department Inc ↗
  • Who funds GREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOUSTON SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds Texas A&M Foundation ↗
  • Who funds FRIO CANYON EMS INC ↗
  • Who funds HOUSTON HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE LIBRARY ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Houston Community FoundationTX17.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Houston Community Foundation · H E Butt Foundation · Houston Endowment Inc · Shell USA Company Foundation · O'Kelley - Hemminghaus Foundation · The Brown Foundation Inc · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rhett Butler Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rhett Butler Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Rhett Butler Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Rhett Butler Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rhett Butler’s filings →

    More from the funding graph