Skip to content
Retailroi Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Retailroi Inc

Retailroi, inc is a grass-roots charity of people in the retail industry to help orphans and vulnerable children using our skills, companies, and expertise to make a difference.

$383k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$51k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Human Services$481kInternational$443kYouth Development$166kEmployment$125kEducation$124kRecreation & Sports$35kCrime & Legal$25kPhilanthropy$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 18 grants below total $276,220, the rows itemized in this filing. The $382,940 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $106,720 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $202k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $51k
$10,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$133k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LIFESONG FOR ORPHANS$51,000
CONGRESSIONAL COALITION ON ADOPTION$25,000
FERGUS SIMPSON FOUNDATION$24,220
CASITA COPAN$23,000
TOGETHER FOR GOOD$20,000
THRIVE IN JOY NICK FAGNANO FOUNDATI$20,000
IDEAS$15,000
BOTH HANDS FOUNDATION$15,000
4 KIDS OF SOUTH FLORIDA$10,000
KIDS MATTER INTERNATIONAL$10,000
TENNESSEE ALLIANCE FOR KIDS$10,000
MAYAS HOPE FOUNDATION INC$10,000
CONGREGATIONS FOR KIDS$10,000
CARE FOR CHILDREN$10,000
BOTTLES2BRICKS$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $354k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Without Borders: $10k → 5%TOGETHER FOR GOOD: $25k → 14%CASITA COPAN: $25k → 11%CONGREGATIONS FOR KIDS: $15k → 10%Fulaa LifeLine: $20k → 6%TOGETHER FOR GOOD: $20k → 14%CASITA COPAN: $25k → 11%TENNESSEE ALLIANCE FOR KIDS: $13k → 14%CONGREGATIONS FOR KIDS: $15k → 10%TOGETHER FOR GOOD: $20k → 14%CASITA COPAN: $23k → 11%TENNESSEE ALLIANCE FOR KIDS: $10k → 14%CONGREGATIONS FOR KIDS: $10k → 10%TOGETHER FOR GOOD: $15k → 14%Casita Copan: $20k → 11%TENNESSEE ALLIANCE FOR KIDS: $10k → 14%Congregations for Kids: $8k → 10%Together for Good: $15k → 14%CASITA COPAN: $20k → 11%TENNESSEE ALLIANCE FOR KIDS: $8k → 14%CONGREGATIONS FOR KIDS: $8k → 10%STRONGER THAN MY FATHER: $5k → 14%STRONGER THAN MY FATHER: $5k → 14%STRONGER THAN MY FATHER: $5k → 14%STRONGER THAN MY FATHER: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
CO
VA
KS
TN
NC
DC
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $105k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 2 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Sub-Saharan Africa$89k · 85% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: GLOBAL LEADERSHIP ACADEMY · ITHEMBA EARLY LEARNING

South America$16k · 15% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: MINISTRY OF COMPASSION & FAITH

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 22% of Retailroi Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Retailroi Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 20% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 19 repeat orgs$149k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +0% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
8

Total granted

$1.3M
$127k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+0%
0%

Still filing today

84%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalEducationYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LF
    LIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $247k · revenue +79%
  • CC
    CONGRESSIONAL COALITION ON ADOPTION INSTITUTE
    5× · 2021–2025 · $130k · revenue +0%
  • TF
    TOGETHER FOR GOOD
    5× · 2021–2025 · $95k · revenue +137%

Funded once

  • FO
    FELIX ORGANIZATION - ADOPTEES FOR CHILDREN INC
    one grant, 2024 · $35k · revenue 0%
  • FL
    FULAA LIFELINE INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue -31%
  • KI
    KIDSAVE INTERNATIONAL INC
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -40%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kids for Him

assisting orphans and missionary in need

International
2
Hope for the Fatherless

HFTF serves orphaned and vulnerable children in Ethiopia, and its mission is to see every child thriving in a loving family. HFTF accomplishes this through five primary initiatives: in-country adoption training and placement, family…

International
3
Deliver Rescuing Children At Risk

Finding forever homes for children

Human Services
4
Compassionate Life Foundation

Support orphans and widows locally, nationally, and internationally

—
5
World Forgotten Children Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Hope's Promise Inc

To strengthen families through ethical, christ-centered foster care, adoption, and global orphan care.

Human Services
7
Project Renewed Hope Inc

Support of Orphaned, Displaced or Abandoned children.

Human Services
8
International Humanity Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Casa de Angeles Foundation
Human Services
10
Childarise

Charitable work for children

International
11
Assist International Inc

Assist international partners with changemakers around the world to provide solutions that save lives and build resilient communities. we accomplish our mission with actionable projects that make a lasting and sustainable impact on the…

International
12
International Christian Partners Llc

Childrens Home and Ministry in India

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lifesong for Orphans Inc; the most unlike its peers is Aerial Recovery. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/26
Grantees still filing
13/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONGRESSIONAL COALITION ON ADOPTION INSTITUTE: $130,000 · Human ServicesCONGRESSIONAL COALITION ON ADOPTION INSTITUT…CASITA COPAN INC: $113,000 · Human ServicesCASITA COPAN INCTOGETHER FOR GOOD: $95,000 · Human ServicesTOGETHER FOR GOODBoth Hands Foundation: $80,000 · Human ServicesBoth Hands FoundationCongregations for Kids Inc: $55,000 · Human ServicesCongregations for Kids IncTennessee Alliance for Kids: $40,500 · Human ServicesTennessee Alliance for KidsFULAA LIFELINE INTERNATIONAL: $20,000 · Human ServicesSTRONGER THAN MY FATHER: $20,000 · Human Services+1 more: $10,000 · Human ServicesLIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC: $247,000 · InternationalLIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INCCOMPASSIONATE HOPE FOUNDATION: $66,000 · InternationalCOMPASSIONATE HOPE FOUNDATI…KIDSAVE INTERNATIONAL INC: $20,000 · InternationalKIDSAVE INTERNATIONAL INC+1 more: $10,000 · InternationalFergus Simpson Foundation: $138,526 · Community ImprovementFergus Sim…THRIVE IN JOY NICK FAGNANO FOUNDATION: $80,000 · EducationFREE FOR LIFE INTERNATIONAL: $30,000 · EducationFOSTERING MEDITATION: $25,000 · OtherFOSTERING MED…CONTROL ALT DELETE POVERTY: $22,000 · OtherCONTROL ALT D…4KIDS OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $20,000 · Other4KIDS OF SOUT…AERIAL RECOVERY: $15,000 · OtherAERIAL RECOVE…BOTTLES2BRICKS INC: $7,000 · OtherFELIX ORGANIZATION - ADOPTEES FOR CHILDREN INC: $35,000 · OtherFELIX ORGANIZ…MAYAS HOPE FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · OtherMAYAS HOPE FO…SEWPPORTIVE FRIENDS INC: $14,350 · OtherSEWPPORTIVE F…+2 more: $10,000 · Other+2 moreDESTA: $50,000 · EmploymentTHE GEAR FOUNDATION: $7,500 · EmploymentCARE FOR CHILDREN CARE FOR CHILDREN - USA INC: $27,500 · Youth DevelopmentCHILDRENS LAW CENTER OF WASHINGTON: $25,000 · Youth Development
Human Services$563,500International$343,000Community Improvement$138,526Education$110,000Other$168,350Employment$57,500Youth Development$52,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC: $247,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFergus Simpson Foundation: $138,526 over 5y, 11% of budgetCONGRESSIONAL COALITION ON ADOPTION INSTITUTE: $130,000 over 5y, 5.9% of budgetCASITA COPAN INC: $113,000 over 5y, 12% of budgetTOGETHER FOR GOOD: $95,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetTHRIVE IN JOY NICK FAGNANO FOUNDATION: $80,000 over 4y, 8.3% of budgetBoth Hands Foundation: $80,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetCOMPASSIONATE HOPE FOUNDATION: $66,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetCongregations for Kids Inc: $55,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetDESTA: $50,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetTennessee Alliance for Kids: $40,500 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetFELIX ORGANIZATION - ADOPTEES FOR CHILDREN INC: $35,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetFREE FOR LIFE INTERNATIONAL: $30,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetCARE FOR CHILDREN CARE FOR CHILDREN - USA INC: $27,500 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetCHILDRENS LAW CENTER OF WASHINGTON: $25,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetFULAA LIFELINE INTERNATIONAL: $20,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetSTRONGER THAN MY FATHER: $20,000 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetMAYAS HOPE FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetKIDSAVE INTERNATIONAL INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAERIAL RECOVERY: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWITHOUT BORDERS INTERNATIONAL: $10,000 over 1y, 9.9% of budgetKIDS MATTER INTERNATIONAL: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTHE GEAR FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 1y, 31% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Giving Back FundServant FoundationThe Signatry Charitab…Natl Christian Charit…Renaissance Charitabl…American Endowment Fo…The Blackbaud Giving …Charities Aid Foundat…National Philanthropi…American Online Givin…Network for GoodDonor Advised Charita…
The Giving Back FundMA34.5× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Giving Back Fund · Servant Foundation · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Retailroi Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Retailroi Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Retailroi Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Retailroi Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Retailroi’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home