Skip to content
Resort Charity Events Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Resort Charity Events Inc

The corporation is organized for religious, charitable, scientific, literary, or educational purposes, including the making of distributions to 501(c)(3) organizations.

$106k
Granted FY2023
2
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$98k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Health$820kHousing & Shelter$295kPhilanthropy$20kArts & Culture$13kFood & Nutrition$8kYouth Development$8kHuman Services$1k
02FY2023 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $103,760, the rows itemized in this filing. The $105,992 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $2,232 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $98k
$98,260
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Riley Children's Foundation$98,260
Ascension St Vincent Evansville Foundation$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%Memorial Hospital Foundation: $7k → 8%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION PARTNERSHIP INC: $10k → 12%Riley Children's Foundation: $200k → 15%Boys & Girls Club of Evansville Inc: $8k → 15%JAMES WHITCOMB RILEY MEMORIAL ASSOCIATION: $185k → 16%Orange County Indiana Habitat for Humanity Inc: $35k → 15%CASA: $8k → 15%JAMES WHITCOMB RILEY MEMORIAL ASSOCIATION: $184k → 16%Orange County Indiana Habitat for Humanity: $30k → 15%JAMES WHITCOMB RILEY MEMORIAL ASSOCIATION: $174k → 16%Orange County Indiana Habitat for Humanity: $30k → 15%Riley Children's Foundation: $135k → 16%ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 15%Riley Children's Foundation: $98k → 16%IU HEALTH PAOLI HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%French Lick West Baden Museum: $5k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 3 repeat orgs$48k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2023, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
8

Total granted

$1.1M
$48k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+23%

Still filing today

100%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23
Arts & CultureHealthPhilanthropyCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • James Whitcomb Riley Memorial Association
    5× · 2017–2023 · $776k · revenue +63%
  • OC
    ORANGE CO IN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC
    3× · 2018–2021 · $260k · revenue +26% · 93% of their budget
  • SM
    ST MARY'S HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2017–2023 · $24k · revenue -33%

Funded once

  • IU
    INDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH PAOLI HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • LJ
    LOUIS J KOCH FAMILY CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF EVANSVILLE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $8k · revenue +72%
  • VC
    Vanderburgh County CASA Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue -1%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indiana University Health Arnett Foundation Inc

As a public charity and supporting organization, the mission of indiana university health arnett foundation, inc. ("iu health arnett foundation") is to benefit, perform and carry out the charitable, educational, scientific and other exempt…

—
2
Indiana University Health Frankfort Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
3
Healthlinc Incorporated

Coordinate health care information by providing a community-wide clinical data and information exchange to the health care community.

—
4
Indiana University Health Foundation Inc

Indiana university health foundation leverages the power of philanthropy to support the iu health goal of making indiana one of the healthiest states in the nation.

Health
5
Indiana University Health Ball Memorial Physicians Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
6
Indiana University Health Bloomington Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
7
Indiana University Health White Memorial Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
8
Indiana University Health Bedford Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
9
Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
10
Eskenazi Health Foundation Inc

Eskenazi Health Foundation inspires, energizes and promotes a vital, healthy Indianapolis community by providing strategic guidance and philanthropic resources to Eskenazi Health.

Health
11
Indiana University Health Blackford Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
12
Memorial Hospital Foundation of Cass County Inc

Gifting for health - logansport memorial hospital foundation builds capital, awards grants and promotes services to enhance the overall health and wellness of our community.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Memorial Hospital Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is French Lick West Baden Cultural Ctr. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

James Whitcomb Riley Memorial Association: $776,394 · PhilanthropyJames Whitcomb Riley Memorial AssociationORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $45,000 · PhilanthropyORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC+1 more: $10,000 · PhilanthropyORANGE CO IN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $260,000 · OtherORANGE CO IN HABITAT FOR HUMA…ST MARY'S HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $23,750 · OtherST MARY'S HEALTH FOUNDATION I…+3 more: $18,600 · Other+3 moreLOUIS J KOCH FAMILY CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF EVANSVILLE INC: $7,500 · Arts & CultureFRENCH LICK WEST BADEN CULTURAL CTR: $5,000 · Arts & CultureMEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $6,730 · HealthHEALTHNET INC: $3,000 · HealthVanderburgh County CASA Inc: $7,500 · Civil Rights
Philanthropy$831,394Other$302,350Arts & Culture$12,500Health$9,730Civil Rights$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJames Whitcomb Riley Memorial Association: $776,394 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetORANGE CO IN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $260,000 over 3y, 93% of budgetORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $45,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetST MARY'S HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $23,750 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION PARTNERSHIP INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetINDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH PAOLI HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetLOUIS J KOCH FAMILY CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF EVANSVILLE INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF EVANSVILLE INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $6,730 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFRENCH LICK WEST BADEN CULTURAL CTR: $5,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetHEALTHNET INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYoung Mens Christian Association of Monroe County Inc: $1,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lilly Endowment IncBraun Family Foundati…Community Foundation …Duke Energy FoundationDonor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Lilly Endowment IncIN16.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lilly Endowment Inc · Braun Family Foundation Inc co Jim Burger ONB Trust Co · Community Foundation Alliance Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Resort Charity Events Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Resort Charity Events Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Resort Charity Events Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Resort Charity Events Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Resort Charity Events’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home