Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rentch Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$11kPhilanthropy$4kHousing & Shelter$3kReligion$3kArts & Culture$2kMembership Benefit$1kEnvironment$1kCivil Rights$750Other$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$105
Median grant
6
States reached
$64k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MIDWAY UNIVERSITY$1,250
MIDWAY MINESTERIAL ASSOCIATION$1,250
BLUEGRASS COMMUNITY FUND WOODFORD C$750
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$600
NAACP$500
Individual grant recipient$500
Individual grant recipient$500
MIDWAY MUSEUM$305
MIDWAY CHRISTIAN CHURCH$275
RAINBOW PRIDE OF WV$250
KY WATERSHED WATCH$200
CARNEGIE CENTER$200
BLUEGRASS CF MENTORS MEALS$105
applstop$100
Individual grant recipient$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $50) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $50 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$17k · 7 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +54% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
14

Total granted

$17k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+27%

Still filing today

29%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 32% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureHealthPublic BenefitInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MU
    MIDWAY UNIVERSITY INC FKA MIDWAY COLLEGE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $10k · revenue +54%
  • TH
    THE HOMEPLACE AT MIDWAY
    4× · 2019–2022 · $3k
  • MC
    MIDWAY CHRISTIAN CHURCH
    5× · 2020–2025 · $2k

Funded once

  • WC
    WOODFORD COUNTY COMMUNITY FUND
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • SC
    SECOND CHRISTIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Appalachian Investment Corporation

Appalachian investment corporation works to increase economic activity in the appalachian counties of kentucky.

—
2
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
3
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
4
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
5
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
6
National Association for College Admission Counseling

Empowering college admission counseling professionals through education, advocacy, and community.

Education
7
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
8
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

—
9
Kentucky Bankers Association

To provide effective advocacy for the financial services industry both in kentucky and on a national level; to serve as a reliable and responsive source of information and education about areas of interest to the industry; and to provide a…

—
10
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
11
National Association of Corporate Directors

We empower directors and transform boards to be future ready.

Public Benefit
12
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The West Virginia Humanities Council Inc; the most unlike its peers is Friends of Larche Atlanta Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE HOMEPLACE AT MIDWAY: $3,250 · OtherTHE HOMEPLACE AT MIDWAYMIDWAY CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $1,650 · OtherMIDWAY CHRISTIAN CHURCHWOODFORD COUNTY COMMUNITY FUND: $1,500 · OtherWOODFORD COUNTY COMMUNITY FUNDMIDWAY MINESTERIAL ASSOCIATION: $1,250 · OtherMIDWAY MINESTERIAL ASSOCIATIONSECOND CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $1,000 · OtherSECOND CHRISTIAN CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $1,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $750 · OtherBLUEGRASS COMMUNITY FUND WOODFORD C: $750 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $600 · Other+24 more: $4,995 · Other+24 moreMIDWAY UNIVERSITY INC FKA MIDWAY COLLEGE: $10,430 · EducationMIDWAY UNIVERSITY INC FKA MIDWAY COLLEGEFRONTIER NURSING UNIVERSITY INC: $500 · EducationBLUE GRASS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,873 · PhilanthropyBLUEGRASS LAND CONSERVANCY INC: $300 · EnvironmentTHE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION: $100 · Arts & CultureAPPALSHOP INC: $100 · Arts & CultureKENTUCKY CENTER FOR ECONOMIC POLICY INC: $100 · Public BenefitFRIENDS OF LARCHE ATLANTA INC: $50 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $50 · Human Services
Other$16,745Education$10,930Philanthropy$1,873Environment$300Arts & Culture$200Public Benefit$100Human Services$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMIDWAY UNIVERSITY INC FKA MIDWAY COLLEGE: $10,430 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBLUE GRASS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,873 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN CARE COMMUNITIES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRONTIER NURSING UNIVERSITY INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLUEGRASS LAND CONSERVANCY INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKENTUCKY CENTER FOR ECONOMIC POLICY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAgnes Scott College: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAPPALSHOP INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF LARCHE ATLANTA INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MIDWAY UNIVERSITY INC FKA MIDWAY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds BLUE GRASS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN CARE COMMUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds FRONTIER NURSING UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds BLUEGRASS LAND CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KENTUCKY CENTER FOR ECONOMIC POLICY INC ↗
  • Who funds Agnes Scott College ↗
  • Who funds APPALSHOP INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Kentucky Humanities Council Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF LARCHE ATLANTA INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Blue Grass Community Foundation IncKY19.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Blue Grass Community Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · Snowy Owl Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Corporate Depository Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rentch Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rentch Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rentch Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph