Skip to content
Reinvent Stockton Foundation at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Reinvent Stockton Foundation

To attract outside investment into the stockton community and to invest in collective impact strategies with tangible outcomes that improve the quality of life in the city of stockton, california.

$2.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$340k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Community Improvement$6.1MPhilanthropy$3.6MYouth Development$2.5MEducation$1.8MHuman Services$1.6MHousing & Shelter$1.0MArts & Culture$803kEnvironment$637kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 18 grants below total $1,678,863, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,665,038 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $986,175 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $175k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $897k
  • $250k+2 grants · $608k
$90,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$31M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LITTLE MANILA RISING$340,000
RESTORE THE DELTA$267,500
COMMUNITY PARTNERS$188,882
IMPROVE YOUR TOMORROW$160,238
READING AND MATH INC$119,666
UNITED WAY OF SAN JOAQUIN$92,000
MARY GRAHAM CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION$90,000
NZINGA INCORPORATED$90,000
HATCH WORKSHOP$90,000
COLLEGE POSSIBLE$66,077
AFRICAN AMERICAN CHAMBER OF SAN JOAQUIN FOUNDATION$46,000
UNBOUND STOCKTON COMMUNITY SCHOOL$46,000
GO PUBLIC SCHOOLS$20,000
WITH OUR WORDS INC$17,500
FRESNO COUNTY ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES COMMISSION$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 53% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%TIDES CENTER: $50k → 10%FRESNO COUNTY ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES COMMISSION: $15k → 19%UPTOGETHER PARTNERS: $492k → 10%REINVENT SOUTH STOCKTON COALITION: $29k → 10%FAMILY INDEPENDENCE INITIATIVE: $100k → 10%NZINGA INCORPORATED: $115k → 12%NZINGA INCORPORATED: $115k → 12%NZINGA INCORPORATED: $90k → 12%SOW A SEED COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $215k → 12%SOW A SEED COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $166k → 12%SOW A SEED COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $54k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
RI
CA
KY
NM
KS
NC
SC
DC
LA
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 15% of Reinvent Stockton Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Reinvent Stockton Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$9.2M · 27 repeat orgs$5.4M to everyone else

27 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
24

Total granted

$9.2M
$5.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+64%

Still filing today

81%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $173k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LM
    LITTLE MANILA RISING
    4× · 2020–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +838%
  • RT
    RESTORE THE DELTA
    4× · 2021–2024 · $905k · revenue +193% · 30% of their budget
  • CP
    COMMUNITY PARTNERS
    5× · 2020–2024 · $711k · revenue +111%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $726k
  • MU
    METRO UNITED WAY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $520k · revenue -35%
  • HS
    HUMAN SERVICES COALITION OF TOMPKINS COUNTY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $500k · revenue -14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
2
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
3
Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.

Philanthropy
4
Sacramento Region Community Foundation

The Sacramento Region Community Foundation leads, serves, and inspires enduring philanthropy for a just and vibrant Sacramento region.

Philanthropy
5
Foundation for California Community Colleges

The foundation's mission is to benefit, support, and enhance the missions of the california community college system.

Education
6
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
7
Solano Community Foundation

The Solano Community Foundation strengthens Solano County by advancing equity, supporting nonprofit resilience, and expanding access to philanthropy. We serve as a community leader, responsive grantmaker, and trusted partner for donors who…

Philanthropy
8
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
9
Fresno Community Development Financial Institution dba Access Plus Capital

Access plus capital is nonprofit small business lender and service provider with the mission to eliminate economic barriers to financial success through fair and equitable community investment.

Public Benefit
10
United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey

United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…

Philanthropy
11
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
12
Community Vision Capital & Consulting

Community vision capital & consulting promotes economic justice and alleviates poverty by increasing the financial resilience and sustainability of community-based nonprofits and enterprises. through flexible financial products and sound…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Joaquin Community Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hatch Workshop. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

51 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 51 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

8
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
49/51
Grantees still filing
34/51
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY: $1,160,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEYUNITED WAY OF PIERCE COUNTY: $610,500 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF PIERCE COUNTYCENTRAL CAROLINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $606,920 · PhilanthropyCENTRAL CAROLINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATI…GIVE BACK FOUNDATION: $600,000 · PhilanthropyGIVE BACK FOUNDATIONSAINT PAUL & MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $600,000 · PhilanthropySAINT PAUL & MINNESOTA FOUNDATIONMETRO UNITED WAY INC: $520,000 · PhilanthropyMETRO UNITED WAY INCTHE PENNY FOUNDATION: $510,000 · PhilanthropyTHE PENNY FOUNDATIONCAMBRIDGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $500,000 · PhilanthropyCAMBRIDGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONTHE MAYOR'S FUND FOR LOS ANGELES: $500,000 · PhilanthropyTHE MAYOR'S FUND FOR LOS ANGELES+4 more: $175,000 · PhilanthropyIndividual grant recipient: $725,703 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCITY OF DURHAM: $525,723 · OtherCITY OF DURHAMFORWARD TOGETHER NEW ORLEANS: $520,000 · OtherFORWARD TOGETHER NEW ORLEANSTHE URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER ATLANTA INC: $510,000 · OtherTHE URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER ATLAN…CITY OF SHREVEPORT: $500,000 · OtherCITY OF SHREVEPORTAMOS HOUSE: $500,000 · OtherAMOS HOUSEFORCE FOR GOOD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $500,000 · OtherFORCE FOR GOOD COMMUNITY DEVELOPM…IMPROVE YOUR TOMORROW INC: $344,476 · OtherIMPROVE YOUR TOMORROW INCDELTA SCULLING CENTER EVERYBODY SCULLS INC: $210,000 · Other+20 more: $1,043,006 · Other+20 moreFII - NATIONAL: $592,000 · Human ServicesFII - NATIONALCommunity Spring Inc: $500,000 · Human ServicesCommunity Spri…SOW A SEED COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $434,600 · Human ServicesSOW A SEED COM…NZINGA INCORPORATED: $320,000 · Human ServicesNZINGA INCORPO…TIDES CENTER: $282,563 · Human ServicesTIDES CENTERMARY GRAHAM CHILDRENS FOUNDATION: $130,000 · Human ServicesMARY GRAHAM CH…+1 more: $15,000 · Human ServicesREADING AND MATH INC: $501,603 · EducationSANTA FE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $500,000 · EducationCOLLEGE POSSIBLE INC: $234,354 · EducationTeach for America Inc: $85,250 · Education+4 more: $85,556 · EducationLITTLE MANILA RISING: $1,164,275 · Arts & CultureHatch Workshop: $164,000 · Arts & CultureCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $711,017 · Community ImprovementHUMAN SERVICES COALITION OF TOMPKINS COUNTY INC: $500,000 · Community ImprovementCompton Community Development Corporation: $100,000 · Community ImprovementRESTORE THE DELTA: $904,843 · Environment
Philanthropy$5,782,420Other$5,378,908Human Services$2,274,163Education$1,406,763Arts & Culture$1,328,275Community Improvement$1,311,017Environment$904,843

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLITTLE MANILA RISING: $1,164,275 over 4y, 19% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY: $1,160,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetRESTORE THE DELTA: $904,843 over 4y, 30% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $711,017 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF PIERCE COUNTY: $610,500 over 3y, 4.9% of budgetCENTRAL CAROLINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $606,920 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetGIVE BACK FOUNDATION: $600,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSAINT PAUL & MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $600,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFII - NATIONAL: $592,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetFORWARD TOGETHER NEW ORLEANS: $520,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetMETRO UNITED WAY INC: $520,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetTHE PENNY FOUNDATION: $510,000 over 2y, 88% of budgetTHE URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER ATLANTA INC: $510,000 over 2y, 8.5% of budgetREADING AND MATH INC: $501,603 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetHUMAN SERVICES COALITION OF TOMPKINS COUNTY INC: $500,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetSANTA FE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $500,000 over 1y, 36% of budgetAMOS HOUSE: $500,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetCAMBRIDGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $500,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetTHE MAYOR'S FUND FOR LOS ANGELES: $500,000 over 1y, 9.5% of budgetSOW A SEED COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $434,600 over 3y, 33% of budgetIMPROVE YOUR TOMORROW INC: $344,476 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetNZINGA INCORPORATED: $320,000 over 3y, 98% of budgetTIDES CENTER: $282,563 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE POSSIBLE INC: $234,354 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetDELTA SCULLING CENTER EVERYBODY SCULLS INC: $210,000 over 2y, 31% of budgetFAMILY RESOURCE & REFERRAL CENTER OF SAN JOAQUIN: $170,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHatch Workshop: $164,000 over 3y, 47% of budgetFathers and Families of San Joaquin: $138,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetMARY GRAHAM CHILDRENS FOUNDATION: $130,000 over 3y, 20% of budgetUNBOUND STOCKTON COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $120,000 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetCompton Community Development Corporation: $100,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCONNECT: $100,000 over 1y, 66% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY: $92,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $85,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAN JOAQUIN JR GOLF FOUNDATION: $72,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetSAFE PASSAGES: $50,250 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetWest Contra Costa Public Education Fund: $50,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetAFRICAN AMERICAN CHAMBER OF SAN JOAQUIN FOUNDATION: $46,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetSAN JOAQUIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetGO Public Schools: $40,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetASSET FUNDERS NETWORK: $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCOLLEGE SUMMIT INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFresno County Economic Opportunities Commission: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASPIRE PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of the Pacific: $10,556 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF KAW VALLEY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEMERGENCY FOOD BANK: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTOCKTONIANS TAKING ACTION TO NEUTRALIZE DRUGS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kaiser Foundation Hos…Sierra Health Foundat…The California Endowm…The Antone and Marie …The James Irvine Foun…Port City Operating C…The Cortopassi Family…Sunlight GivingSilicon Valley Commun…Dignity HealthEast Bay Community Fo…United Way of San Joa…
Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCA27.7× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management · The California Endowment · The Antone and Marie Raymus Foundation · The James Irvine Foundation · Port City Operating Company LLC · The Cortopassi Family Foundation · Sunlight Giving · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Dignity Health · East Bay Community Foundation · United Way of San Joaquin County

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Reinvent Stockton Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Reinvent Stockton Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    19report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Reinvent Stockton Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Reinvent Stockton Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Reinvent Stockton’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home