· Private foundation
Reiman Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k19 grants · $23k
- $10k–50k54 grants · $822k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $355k
- $250k+5 grants · $4.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Childrens Hospital of Wisconsin Foundation | $1,000,000 |
| Childrens Hospital of Wisconsin Foundation | $1,000,000 |
| Ace Scholarships | $1,000,000 |
| Childrens Hospital Of Wisconsin Foundation | $1,000,000 |
| Iowa State University Foundation | $289,197 |
| Friends of Plum Media | $180,000 |
| Unity Church | $75,000 |
| Aurora Medical Health Care Foundation | $50,000 |
| Jack A Vickers Prostate Cancer Fund | $50,000 |
| Wisconsin Puppy Mill Project Inc | $26,500 |
| Third Option Foundation | $25,000 |
| Regis University | $25,000 |
| Evans Scholarship Foundation | $25,000 |
| Lee's Summitt Education Foundation | $25,000 |
| Wisconsin Puppy Mill Project Inc | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
78 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2024, 47 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $156k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CHCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC7× · 2018–2024 · $17M · revenue +78%
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION6× · 2017–2024 · $6.9M · revenue +1%- AFALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION8× · 2017–2024 · $4.4M · revenue +194%
Funded once
- CHChildren's Hospital of WI Foundationone grant, 2017 · $1.0M
- RCRed Caboose Child Care Center Incgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $500k · revenue +52%
- CLCarroll Library Foundationone grant, 2020 · $150k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.
To provide the highest level of stewardship for university donors through professional management and oversight of the university of minnesota foundation's assets by creating a focused investment environment with clarity of purpose,…
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…
The university of iowa facilities corporation acquires and holds property for the benefit and use of the university of iowa.
We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.
Engages, equips and empowers learners to explore their vocations, fulfill their potential and serve the world.
The missouri western state university foundation is a not-for-profit charitable organization that functions solely to support the mission of missouri western state university, as stated in the university's mission statement. the foundation…
The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.
Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.
Unite the caring power of communities to invest in effective solutions to improve people's lives.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Farmhouse Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Wisconsin Executive Residence Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
65 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 65 of the 139 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC ↗
- Who funds WISCONSIN PUPPY MILL PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds Emory University ↗
- Who funds WIL-MAR NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FARM SANCTUARY INC ↗
- Who funds DENVER ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds GREENPEACE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF MAIN STREETS INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Red Caboose Child Care Center Inc ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR GREATER ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds THE JOHN LYNCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LEES SUMMIT EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GRALAND COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds KEEP IOWA BEAUTIFUL ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DENVER ↗
- Who funds KYLES KORNER INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FARMHOUSE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds COLORADO GOLF FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COLORADO OPEN GOLF FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Evan & Marion Helfaer Foundation · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Joseph and Vera Zilber Family Foundation Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Anon Charitable Trust · Baird Foundation Inc · Waukesha County Community Foundation · The Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation Inc · Rose Community Foundation · Hauske Family Foundation Inc · Archdiocese of Milwaukee Catholic Community Foundation Inc · The Anschutz Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Reiman Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Best Buddies International Inc — 4% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Reiman Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Reiman Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.