· Public charity
Reid Hospital & Health Care Services Inc
Our mission: to lead our communities to well-being, one person at a time.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 23 grants below total $229,325 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $299,700 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $70,375 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k12 grants · $92k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $138k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Girls Inc of Wayne County | $18,300 |
| Birth to Five | $16,500 |
| Gleaners Food Bank of IN | $13,300 |
| Communities In Schools of Wayne County | $13,300 |
| Circle You Help Center | $13,300 |
| The Shepherds Way Christian Ministries | $11,564 |
| A Better Way Services | $10,861 |
| Bridges for Life | $10,600 |
| Stayin' Alive | $10,000 |
| Hope Crisis Pregnancy Center | $10,000 |
| The Shelter | $10,000 |
| Recovery Rocks Club | $9,500 |
| Children's & Justice Advocacy Center | $8,300 |
| Dublin Community Club | $8,300 |
| Food Bank | $8,300 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $232k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +56% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.
33 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $65k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BABOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF WAYNE COUNTY7× · 2017–2023 · $178k · revenue +57%
- WFWHOLE FAMILY COMMUNITY INITIATIVE INCORPORATED7× · 2018–2024 · $96k · revenue +116%
- TSTHE SHEPHERD'S WAY CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INC6× · 2018–2024 · $76k · revenue +90%
Funded once
- COCITY OF CONNERSVILLEone grant, 2019 · $35k
- FCFranklin Countyone grant, 2022 · $15k
- NPNEW PARIS COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRYone grant, 2018 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We are a client centered recovery community building healthy relationships in an alcohol and drug free environment. we focus on honesty, accountability, spirituality, productivity and integrity.
To assist individuals recovering from addiction, implement lifestyle changes, gain employment and housing
To provide shelter for the homeless during the day, provide professional crisis intervention, provide professional drug and alcohol abuse intervention, provide medical screening upon request and provide a representative payee program
Provide services in response to individual need
The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, dignity, and freedom for all.
The mission of new choices, inc. is to provide shelby county, ohio with the immediate care needs for individuals of domestic violence.
To provide low rent housing and specialized programming for the emotionally ill, developmentally disabled, alcoholics, and drug abusing persons.
To reduce recidivism rate in female offenders in laporte county.
The ywca strengthens our community against violence and aggression. we provide immediate safety, lasting stability, independence, empowerment, and transformation for all. we are a source of hope.
To provide guidance and rehabilitation in a christ centered residential setting for persons with addiction
Addiction recovery for women
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is A Better Way Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Stanley W Hayes Research Fdn Inc Aka Hayes Arboretum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF WAYNE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds BIRTH TO FIVE INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds WHOLE FAMILY COMMUNITY INITIATIVE INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds THE SHEPHERD'S WAY CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDRENS JUSTICE AND ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CARDINAL GREENWAY INC ↗
- Who funds GLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds DARKE COUNTY YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds RANDOLF COUNTY VETERANS SHELTER INC DBA THE JOURNEY HOME ↗
- Who funds GENESIS OF RICHMOND INC ↗
- Who funds CIRCLE YOU HELP CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF WAYNE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER DAYTON ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF WAYNE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds CENTERSTONE OF INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER OF EASTERN INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds UNCHAINED PRAISES LTD ↗
- Who funds HOPE PREGNANCY CENTER DBA HOPE CENTER ↗
- Who funds Servants at Work Inc ↗
- Who funds A BETTER WAY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds AMIGOS THE RICHMOND LATINO CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds PREBLE COUNTY ART ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MERIDIAN HEALTH SERVICES CORP ↗
- Who funds BRIDGES FOR LIFE INC ↗
- Who funds STAYIN' ALIVE INC ↗
- Who funds THE SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds ACHIEVA RESOURCES CORPORATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Wayne County Indiana Foundation Inc · United Way of Whitewater Valley Inc · First Bank Richmond Inc Community Foundation · The Paul W Lingle Family Foundation · The Stamm Koechlein Family Foundation co Monica Koechlein · Lilly Endowment Inc · Quigg Fund Inc · Community Foundation of Randolph County Inc · Heart of Indiana United Way Inc · University of Indianapolis · Early Learning Indiana Inc · Fayette County Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Reid Hospital & Health Care Services Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.