· Private foundation
The Stamm Koechlein Family Foundation co Monica Koechlein
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 71% of The Stamm Koechlein Family Foundation co Monica Koechlein’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k19 grants · $93k
- $10k–50k15 grants · $252k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Boys Girls Clubs of Wayne County | $35,000 |
| Richmond Community Schools | $24,000 |
| Richmond Civic Theatre | $20,000 |
| Richmond Art Museum | $17,500 |
| Girls Inc of Wayne County | $17,500 |
| Indiana University East | $16,800 |
| Individual grant recipient | $15,500 |
| Cope Environmental Center | $15,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $15,000 |
| Richmond Parks and Recreation | $15,000 |
| Wayne County Historical Museum | $15,000 |
| Amigos Latino Center | $15,000 |
| Neighborhood Health Center | $11,000 |
| Cope Environmental Center | $10,000 |
| Every Child Can Read | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
38 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $88k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CECOPE ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER9× · 2017–2025 · $130k · revenue +32%
- RCRICHMOND CIVIC THEATRE INC7× · 2019–2025 · $110k · revenue +39%
- RARICHMOND ART MUSEUM9× · 2017–2025 · $83k · revenue +63%
Funded once
- ATAMIGOS THE RICHMOND LATINO CENTER INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +142%
- TITrustee Indiana Uone grant, 2017 · $12k
- AAAlzheimers Assn Greater Indianaone grant, 2022 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The organization's mission is to sustain a vibrant, healthy and strong community through affordable, culturally competent, quality primary health care.
Support our members and the business environment by fostering economic and community development initiatives to improve the quality of life in harrison county.
The mission of the fair housing center of central indiana (fhcci) is to facilitate open housing for all people by ensuring the availability of affordable and accessible housing; promoting housing choice and homeownership; advocating for an…
To provide high-quality, comprehensive, community-sensitive health care utilizing christ-oriented principles. rooted in our faith-driven values, sichc serves as a pillar for accessible, comprehensive care of the whole person and a catalyst…
To provide education and assistance to low income, disadvantaged individuals and children.
Waynesburg university educates students to make connections between faith, learning and serving so they might faithfully transofrm their communiities and the world. see continuation on schedule o.as a christian comprehensive university, we…
Providing primary health care to low-income residents.
To champion the connection of needed community resources with schools to help young people successfully learn, stay in school and prepare for life.
To be a catalyst in Richmond for learning and living through art.
Focus support for health, education and financial stability in grant county, indiana to achieve measurable results by uniting community resources.
Richmond County Partnership for Children advances a high-quality, accountable system of care and early education for each child beginning with a healthy birth, and supports families to improve early childhood health and development to…
To maximize the development and utilization of the human and economic resources of the wayne county georgraphical area in order to create or preserve jobs and employment opportunities and improve the welfare of people of the area.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina Inc and the most unlike its peers is Stanley W Hayes Research Fdn Inc Aka Hayes Arboretum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COPE ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds WAYNE COUNTY HISTORICAL MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds RICHMOND CIVIC THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds CARDINAL GREENWAY INC ↗
- Who funds RICHMOND ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds STANLEY W HAYES RESEARCH FDN INC AKA HAYES ARBORETUM ↗
- Who funds FEATHER RIVER LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF WAYNE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Earlham College Inc ↗
- Who funds EVERY CHILD CAN READ INC ↗
- Who funds RICHMOND FRIENDS SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds Eagles Wings ↗
- Who funds BIRTH TO FIVE INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds CENTER CITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds AMIGOS THE RICHMOND LATINO CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BRIDGES FOR LIFE INC ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF NORTHEAST MISSOURI INC ↗
- Who funds TOWNSEND COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Wayne County Indiana Foundation Inc · First Bank Richmond Inc Community Foundation · The Paul W Lingle Family Foundation · Quigg Fund Inc · United Way of Whitewater Valley Inc · Reid Hospital & Health Care Services Inc · Ronald L McDaniel Foundation · Lilly Endowment Inc · West End Bank Charitable Foundation · Community Foundation of Randolph County Inc · Wallace W and R Crip Ch Fund Tuw · Gannett Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Stamm Koechlein Family Foundation co Monica Koechlein funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Stamm Koechlein Family Foundation co Monica Koechlein?
Find your warmest path to The Stamm Koechlein Family Foundation co Monica Koechlein through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.