Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rector Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$358k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$105k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$206kPhilanthropy$200kHealth$187kEducation$115kHuman Services$107kInternational$75kEnvironment$70k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $3k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $355k
$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$9.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIGHT FOR LIFE FOUNDATION INC$105,000
LAS MISIONE DISTRICT OF THE RIO TEXAS CONFERENCE U$75,000
PROJECT ROUJ CORPORATION$75,000
D R E A M ALIVE INC$50,000
CHRIS CENTER INC$50,000
ST LUKES UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$1,800
HOLY CROSS LUTHERAN CHURCH$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $175k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PROJECT ROUJ CORPORATION: $100k → 5%PROJECT ROUJ CORPORATION: $75k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

49%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$553k · 6 repeat orgs$565k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +163% since the first grant, against +49% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
15

Total granted

$553k
$335k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+163%
+49%

Still filing today

33%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 36% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $230k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthYouth DevelopmentEducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CHRIS CENTER INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $200k · revenue +163% · 43% of their budget
  • PR
    PROJECT ROUJ CORPORATION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $175k · revenue 0%
  • HC
    HOLY CROSS LUTHERAN CHURCH
    2× · 2024–2025 · $76k

Funded once

  • WN
    WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED METHODIST
    one grant, 2024 · $75k
  • PT
    PROJECT TRANSFORMATION INDIANA CORPORATION
    one grant, 2021 · $75k · revenue -28% · 43% of their budget
  • GR
    GRASS ROOTS-FROM THE PEOPLE FOR THE PEOPLE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
2
Curebound

Curebound's mission is to accelerate cancer research and save lives. we raise and invest strategic funding for innovative adult and pediatric cancer research with one vision: cures in our lifetime.

Health
3
Beat Childhood Cancer Foundation Inc

Beat childhood cancer drives childhood cancer research and raises awareness, making a difference in kids' survival today. our vision is to change the story for the next family by finding viable treatments and ultimately, cures for…

Health
4
Cancer Research Institute Inc

See schedule ocri is a nonprofit organization dedicated to advancing cancer immunotherapy through scientific discovery and global collaboration. since 1953, cri has funded research that deepens understanding of the immune system and its…

Health
5
Imagine a Cure Cancer Treatment
Health
6
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
7
Indiana University Health Foundation Inc

Indiana university health foundation leverages the power of philanthropy to support the iu health goal of making indiana one of the healthiest states in the nation.

Health
8
The H Foundation

The h foundation was established to raise funds for basic science cancer research, supporting the early, novel ideas that may lead research teams to obtain additional grants and advancements in the fight against cancer.

Health
9
Iit Research Institute

Perform basic research and preclinical efficacy assessments of new molecular entities being developed for the prevention and treatment of cancer and infectious disease. Discover new pathways and targets for the design and development of…

Science & Tech
10
Commonwealth Cancer Consortium Inc

Break through cancer is a foundation dedicated to supporting translational research in the most difficult to treat cancers. our partner organizations are among the top cancer research centers and together, represent some of the most…

—
11
Cicp Foundation Inc

Cicp foundation, inc. (the foundation) operates exclusively for the benefit of and carries out the mission of central indiana corporate partnership, inc. (cicp) by engaging in and supporting activities in furtherance of purposes that are…

Community Improvement
12
University Corporate Research Park I Inc

To hold title and perform related functions in connection with a research park and innovation center in support of michigan state university research foundation.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fight for Life Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Project Transformation Indiana Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CHRIS CENTER INC: $200,000 · OtherTHE CHRIS CENTER INCHOLY CROSS LUTHERAN CHURCH: $76,000 · OtherHOLY CROSS LUTHERAN CHURCHLAS MISIONE DISTRICT OF THE RIO TEXAS CONFERENCE U: $75,000 · OtherLAS MISIONE DISTRICT OF THE RIO TEXAS CONFERENCE UWESTERN NORTH CAROLINA ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED METHODIST: $75,000 · OtherWESTERN NORTH CAROLINA ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED METHODI…PROJECT TRANSFORMATION INDIANA CORPORATION: $75,000 · OtherPROJECT TRANSFORMATION INDIANA CORPORATIONST LUKES UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $51,800 · OtherST LUKES UNITED METHODIST CHURCHRENEWABLE HOPE INC: $45,125 · OtherRENEWABLE HOPE INCGRASS ROOTS-FROM THE PEOPLE FOR THE PEOPLE INC: $30,000 · OtherSAINT MATTHEW LUTHERAN CHURCH: $30,000 · OtherBEECH GROVE INDEPENDENT NAZARENE CHURCH INC: $26,000 · Other+6 more: $42,107 · Other+6 moreFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $200,000 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVESTME…PROJECT ROUJ CORPORATION: $175,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT ROUJ CO…FIGHT FOR LIFE FOUNDATION INC: $105,000 · Youth DevelopmentFIGHT FOR LIF…DREAM ALIVE INC: $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentDREAM ALIVE I…BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $25,000 · HealthHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $1,000 · HealthFOUNDATION FOR WOMEN'S CANCER: $1,000 · HealthHOLLIDAY PARK FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · EnvironmentINDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Education
Other$726,032Community Improvement$200,000Human Services$175,000Youth Development$155,000Health$27,000Environment$25,000Education$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CHRIS CENTER INC: $200,000 over 4y, 43% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $200,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT ROUJ CORPORATION: $175,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetFIGHT FOR LIFE FOUNDATION INC: $105,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetPROJECT TRANSFORMATION INDIANA CORPORATION: $75,000 over 1y, 43% of budgetDREAM ALIVE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOLLIDAY PARK FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetINDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR WOMEN'S CANCER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CHRIS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT ROUJ CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds FIGHT FOR LIFE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT TRANSFORMATION INDIANA CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds DREAM ALIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds HOLLIDAY PARK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN'S CANCER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lilly Endowment IncIN14.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lilly Endowment Inc · Richard M Fairbanks Foundation Inc · The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rector Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rector Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Rector Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Rector Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rector Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph