Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Reader Mood McClary Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$90k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Health$110kFood & Nutrition$90kHousing & Shelter$81kAnimals$68kReligion$58kYouth Development$53kHuman Services$48kPublic Safety & Disaster$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $49k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $41k
$8,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PET HELPERS$11,000
STAR GOSPEL MISSION$10,200
BRIGGS DELAINE PEARSON FOUNDATION$10,000
HARVEST HOUSE$10,000
GOOD CHEER FUND P&C$8,000
MY SISTER'S HOUSE$8,000
Individual grant recipient$8,000
CLEAR CELL SARCOMA FOUNDATION$5,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF RICHMOND$5,000
WATER MISSION$5,000
CAMP HAPPY DAYS$5,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $90k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 28% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE GREG HILL FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%HARVEST HOUSE: $10k → 8%MERCY CHEFS: $5k → 20%HARVEST HOUSE: $10k → 8%HARVEST HOUSE: $10k → 8%HARVEST HOUSE: $10k → 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%HARVEST HOUSE: $10k → 8%FLORENCE CRITTENTON PROGRAMS OF SC: $5k → 12%HARVEST HOUSE: $10k → 8%EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $5k → 17%FLORENCE CRITTENTON PROGRAMS OF SC: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
MA
IN
CA
KY
VA
MD
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
AL
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$395k · 15 repeat orgs$206k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
32

Total granted

$395k
$183k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+15%

Still filing today

80%
69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthAnimalsFood & NutritionPhilanthropyReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HARVEST HOUSE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $60k · revenue +1%
  • PH
    PET HELPERS INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $58k · revenue +30%
  • OG
    Oliver Gospel Mission
    5× · 2020–2024 · $45k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • OO
    OAR of Richmond Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -24%
  • BB
    BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • LF
    LOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +15%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Food Bank of Central & Eastern Nc Inc

Nourish people. build solutions. empower communities. no one goes hungry.

Food & Nutrition
2
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
3
Feeding the Carolinas

The mission of the Organization is to coordinate, support, and advocate for member Food Banks across the Carolinas to create lasting solutions to address hunger.

Food & Nutrition
4
Harvest Hope Food Bank

Harvest hope is on a mission to eliminate hunger and food insecurity in south carolina. we rescue nutritious food from stores throughout the state and distribute it to food pantries, shelters, and soup kitchens. we operate programs that…

Food & Nutrition
5
Feeding Southwest Virginia

To provide food and other related products primarily to member agencies for distribution to those in need, and also for direct distribution.

Food & Nutrition
6
Shield of Faith Missions

Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.

Religion
7
Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The primary mission of the humane society is to end animal cruelty, neglect and overpopulation in south carolina.

Animals
8
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
9
Global Partners in Care

The organization's mission is to build partnerships to enhance compassionate care globally. we are dedicated to improving access to hospice and palliative care worldwide.

International
10
Florida Community Health Centers Inc

Florida community health centers, inc. (fchc) is a federally qualified health center serving medically needy populations in south florida, with an emphasis on serving rural and farm worker communities.

11
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
12
Feeding South Florida Inc

Feeding south florida's mission is to end hunger in south florida by providing immediate access to nutritious food, leading hunger and poverty advocacy efforts, and transforming lives through innovative programming and education.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shepherd Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAnimal Rescue and ShelterPregnancy Support ServicesUnited Way AffiliatesAffordable Housing Developm…Health Access Advocacy and …Community FoundationsCancer Support ServicesFood Banks and Pantries
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%0%<5yr12%3%5–10yr15%17%10–20yr24%23%20–35yr9%40%35–55yr19%17%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%0%<5yr12%3%5–10yr15%12%10–20yr24%23%20–35yr9%33%35–55yr19%30%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/38
the rest of the field
12%
3,449/28,751

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/36
Grantees still filing
20/36
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

STAR GOSPEL MISSION — $56,200 · OtherSTAR GOSPEL MISSIONBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF RICHMOND — $15,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF RICHMONDCLEAR CELL SARCOMA FOUNDATION — $15,000 · OtherCLEAR CELL SARCOMA FOUNDATIONGOOD CHEER FUND P&C — $13,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS — $10,000 · OtherLOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC — $10,000 · OtherFALCON CHILDREN'S HOME- TURBEVILLE HOME — $10,000 · OtherTEAM EASTERN KENTUCKY FLOOD RELIEF FUND — $10,000 · OtherBRIGGS-DELAINE-PEARSON FOUNDATION — $10,000 · OtherOAR of Richmond Inc — $10,000 · Other+18 more — $90,500 · Other+18 moreHARVEST HOUSE INC — $60,000 · Human ServicesHARVEST HOUSE INCMy Sister's House Inc — $23,000 · Human ServicesMy Sister's House IncFlorence Crittenton Programs of South Carolina Inc — $10,000 · Human ServicesFlorence Crittenton P…MERCY CHEFS INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $5,000 · Human ServicesEPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT — $5,000 · Human ServicesGREG HILL FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesBaby Quest Foundation Inc — $25,000 · HealthBaby Quest Fou…THE JED FOUNDATION — $15,000 · HealthTHE JED FOUNDA…SARA'S CURE CLEAR CELL SARCOMA FOUNDATION — $15,000 · HealthSARA'S CURE CL…AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION — $5,000 · HealthAMERICAN FOUND…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $5,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDR…Prisma Health-Midlands — $5,000 · HealthPrisma Health-…SHEPHERD CENTER INC — $5,000 · HealthSHEPHERD CENTE…PET HELPERS INC — $57,500 · AnimalsPET HELPERS …K9S FOR WARRIORS INC — $5,000 · AnimalsK9S FOR WARR…FOSTERING FOSTER ANIMAL RESCUE — $5,000 · AnimalsFOSTERING FO…Oliver Gospel Mission — $45,000 · ReligionOliver Go…SAMARITAN'S PURSE — $5,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN…JAMES ISLAND OUTREACH — $25,000 · Housing & ShelterWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $10,000 · InternationalWATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL — $10,000 · International
Other$249,700Human Services$113,000Health$75,000Animals$67,500Religion$50,000Housing & Shelter$25,000International$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHARVEST HOUSE INC — $60,000 over 6y, 3.5% of budgetPET HELPERS INC — $57,500 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetSTAR GOSPEL MISSION — $56,200 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetOliver Gospel Mission — $45,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetJAMES ISLAND OUTREACH — $25,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetBaby Quest Foundation Inc — $25,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetMy Sister's House Inc — $23,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTHE JED FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSARA'S CURE CLEAR CELL SARCOMA FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 3y, 6.2% of budgetBRIGGS-DELAINE-PEARSON FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetFlorence Crittenton Programs of South Carolina Inc — $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetOAR of Richmond Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetK9S FOR WARRIORS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP HAPPY DAYS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMETANOIA — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOSTERING FOSTER ANIMAL RESCUE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA KENTUCKY'S HEARTLAND INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMERCY CHEFS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF KENTUCKY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetFEED MORE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOTA - Children's Organ Transplant Association — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NORTH CAROLINA — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPrisma Health-Midlands — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe National Restaurant Association Educational Foundation — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHEPHERD CENTER INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREG HILL FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Trident United WaySC19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Trident United Way · Coastal Community Foundation of South Carolina Inc · Kuznik Charitable Foundation · The Joanna Foundation · Central Carolina Community Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · The Bessemer Giving Fund · Elhapa Foundation Inc · Henry & Sylvia Yaschik Foundation Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Td Charitable Foundation · Assurant Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Reader Mood McClary Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Volunteer Florida Foundation Inc2% of income from government
  • Harvest House Inc0% of income from government
  • K9S for Warriors Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph