Skip to content

· Public charity

Reach Now International Inc

To reach the devastated and desperate with the gospel of jesus and practical help through strategic joint projects, outreaches, and partnerships.

$9.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$24k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

International$352k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $26,350, the rows itemized in this filing. The $9,250,433 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $9,224,083 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $24k
$23,800
Median grant
2
States reached
$33k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LESEA GLOBAL FEED THE HUNGRY$23,800
FORAFRIKA USA$2,550
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BETHEL GLOBAL RESPONSE: $10k → 14%CHILDRENS HUNGER FUND LEGACY FOUND: $40k → 14%ABUNDANT RAIN MINISTRIES: $3k → 9%JOINT AID MANAGEMENT: $73k → 14%PARAKLETOS MINISTRIES INC: $1k → 13%LESEA GLOBAL FEED THE HUNGRY: $24k → 13%WARM BLANKETS CHILDRENS FOUNDATION: $9k → 14%ABUNDANT RAIN MINISTRIES: $2k → 9%JOINT AID MANAGEMENT: $36k → 14%LESEA GLOBAL FEED THE HUNGRY: $22k → 13%ABUNDANT RAIN MINISTRIES: $2k → 9%JOINT AID MANAGEMENT: $9k → 14%LESEA GLOBAL FEED THE HUNGRY: $22k → 13%FORAFRIKA USA: $41k → 14%LESEA GLOBAL FEED THE HUNGRY: $18k → 13%FORAFRIKA USA: $3k → 14%LESEA GLOBAL FEED THE HUNGRY: $5k → 13%LESEA GLOBAL FEED THE HUNGRY: $3k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$287k · 5 repeat orgs$65k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
5

Total granted

$287k
$65k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+101%
+103%

Still filing today

100%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FU
    FORAFRIKA USA
    7× · 2018–2024 · $162k · revenue +228%
  • LG
    LESEA GLOBAL FEED THE HUNGRY INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $94k · revenue +250%
  • AR
    ABUNDANT RAIN MINISTRIES INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $7k · revenue +101%

Funded once

  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HUNGER FUND LEGACY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    5× · 2017–2021 · $40k · revenue ×11
  • BC
    BETHEL CHURCH OF REDDING
    2× · 2022–2023 · $10k
  • WB
    WARM BLANKETS CHILDRENS FOUNDATION INC DBA KINSHIP UNITEDgraduated
    4× · 2017–2023 · $9k · revenue +103%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Praisin Jesus Feeding Ministries

Missions to children in foreign countries

Religion
2
Unum International Inc

UNUM International is a Christian nonprofit who seeks to address, educate, coordinate, and provide aid and relief to eradicate chronic malnutrition, physical and spiritual hunger, and illiteracy in Guatemala.

International
3
Rejoice Ministries International

RMI provides pastoral care ministry and support globally, with conferences, seminars, retreats, meetings and individual counseling.

Civil Rights
4
Africa Harvest Mission Inc

Evangelism, education, providing for the poor.

Religion
5
Promised Land Ministries International

Promised Land Ministries supports the efforts of Christian missionaries in Central America, primarily Guatemala, in bringing relief to the poor, the distressed, and the underprivileged living in underserved areas. We assist missionaries in…

Religion
6
Global Missions 365 Inc

To share the Gospel of Jesus Christ and support missionaries and ministries.

Religion
7
Kingdom of God Ministry

We are a Christian organization. The mission of this ministry is to preach the Gospel to all nations through the guidance of the Holy Spirit, declare God's glory among the nations and His marvelous deeds.

—
8
Love the Hungry Inc

The corporation is organized to provide nutritious fortified meals throughout the world to children and families that are most vunerable to hunger and malnutriion.

Food & Nutrition
9
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
10
Provision International Inc

Provision international, a world-wide christian ministry of outreach, strives to meet the needs of the earth's less fortunate and downtrodden populace. we are committed to networking resources to serve people in areas of great need.

International
11
Manna International Inc

To promote and propagate the Gospel of Jesus Christ. To establish mantain and assist orphanages,family care and child care programs, nursing home, Leprosarium hospitals, clinics. To engage in relief and development projects in…

Philanthropy
12
Harvesters Reaching the Nations Inc

Nonprofit, Christ-Centered Organization providing discipleship, education, and healthcare to orphans and vulnerable women in remote regions of the world. We are working to realize a vision of a world where children are free from spiritual,…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Hunger Fund Legacy Foundation; the most unlike its peers is La Gonave Haiti Partners Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FORAFRIKA USA: $162,007 · ReligionFORAFRIKA USAPROVIDENT MINISTRIES LTD: $20,500 · ReligionPROVIDENT MINISTRIES LTDABUNDANT RAIN MINISTRIES INC: $7,000 · Religion+1 more: $5,000 · ReligionLESEA GLOBAL FEED THE HUNGRY INC: $93,725 · PhilanthropyLESEA GLOBAL FEED THE HUNGRY I…CHILDREN'S HUNGER FUND LEGACY FOUNDATION: $40,000 · Food & NutritionCHILDREN'S H…BETHEL CHURCH OF REDDING: $10,000 · OtherPARAKLETOS MINISTRIES INC: $1,350 · OtherWARM BLANKETS CHILDRENS FOUNDATION INC DBA KINSHIP UNITED: $8,550 · Youth DevelopmentThe Maisha Project Inc: $4,000 · Human Services
Religion$194,507Philanthropy$93,725Food & Nutrition$40,000Other$11,350Youth Development$8,550Human Services$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFORAFRIKA USA: $162,007 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetLESEA GLOBAL FEED THE HUNGRY INC: $93,725 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S HUNGER FUND LEGACY FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 5y, 8.8% of budgetPROVIDENT MINISTRIES LTD: $20,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetWARM BLANKETS CHILDRENS FOUNDATION INC DBA KINSHIP UNITED: $8,550 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetABUNDANT RAIN MINISTRIES INC: $7,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetJIM KING MINISTRIES INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetThe Maisha Project Inc: $4,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FORAFRIKA USA ↗
  • Who funds LESEA GLOBAL FEED THE HUNGRY INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HUNGER FUND LEGACY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PROVIDENT MINISTRIES LTD ↗
  • Who funds WARM BLANKETS CHILDRENS FOUNDATION INC DBA KINSHIP UNITED ↗
  • Who funds ABUNDANT RAIN MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds JIM KING MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds The Maisha Project Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationKS11.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Reach Now International Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Reach Now International Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Reach Now International Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Reach Now International Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Reach Now International’s filings →

    More from the funding graph