Loading…
· Public charity
REACH NOW INTERNATIONAL INC
To reach the devastated and desperate with the gospel of jesus and practical help through strategic joint projects, outreaches, and partnerships.
$9.3M
Granted FY2024
2
Grants
2
Communities
$24k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.
Religion$195kPhilanthropy$94kFood & Nutrition$40kYouth Development$9kHuman Services$4kOther$11k
02FY2024 · 2 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $3k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $24k
$23,800
Median grant
2
States reached
$33k
Total assets
Largest grants
- LESEA GLOBAL FEED THE HUNGRY$23,800
- FORAFRIKA USA$2,550
02The need
03
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 11%. 98% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$287k · 5 repeat orgs$65k to everyone else
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +154% since the first grant, against +110% for the ones you funded once.
5 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
5
5
Total granted
$287k
$65k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+154%
+110%
Still filing today
100%
60%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
ReligionPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionHuman ServicesOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- JAJOINT AID MANAGEMENT7× · 2018–2024 · $162k · revenue +420%
- LGLESEA GLOBAL FEED THE HUNGRY8× · 2017–2024 · $94k · revenue +423%
- ARABUNDANT RAIN MINISTRIES8× · 2017–2024 · $7k · revenue +154%
Funded once
- CHCHILDRENS HUNGER FUND LEGACY FOUNDgraduated5× · 2017–2021 · $40k · revenue +1037%
- BGBETHEL GLOBAL RESPONSE2× · 2022–2023 · $10k
- WBWARM BLANKETS CHILDRENS FOUNDATION4× · 2017–2023 · $9k · revenue +19%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Praisin Jesus Feeding Ministries
Missions to children in foreign countries
Religion
2
Global Missions 365 Inc
To share the Gospel of Jesus Christ and support missionaries and ministries.
Religion
3
Unum International Inc
UNUM International is a Christian nonprofit who seeks to address, educate, coordinate, and provide aid and relief to eradicate chronic malnutrition, physical and spiritual hunger, and illiteracy in Guatemala.
International
4
Living Faith Ministries International
Our mission is to impact communities by transforming lives. We seek to fulfill the Great Commission by ministering to individuals holistically, meeting their spiritual, physical, and emotional needs.
Religion
5
Africa Harvest Mission Inc
Evangelism, education, providing for the poor.
Religion
6
Amazon Ministries International
To spread the gospel of jesus christ to all nations
Religion
7
Grace Global Ministries Inc
Grace Global Ministries exists to assist local churches in sending global workers to fulfill the Great Commission.
International
8
CrossTalk Global
CrossTalk Global is a Christian educational organization that empowers and trains global church leaders to effectively communicate the Scriptures and share the hope of Christ in their communities. These projects are carried out in the USA…
Religion
9
Provision International Inc
Provision international, a world-wide christian ministry of outreach, strives to meet the needs of the earth's less fortunate and downtrodden populace. we are committed to networking resources to serve people in areas of great need.
International
10
Promised Land Ministries International
Promised Land Ministries supports the efforts of Christian missionaries in Central America, primarily Guatemala, in bringing relief to the poor, the distressed, and the underprivileged living in underserved areas. We assist missionaries in…
Religion
11
Water With Blessings
Mothers and Missioners who bring clean water to God's thirsty children
Human Services
12
Kingdom of God Ministry
Preach the Gospel to all nations through the guidance of the Holy Spirit declare Gods glory and His marvelous deeds among all people
—
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Hunger Fund Legacy Foundation and the most unlike its peers is La Gonave Haiti Partners Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network
15 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Religion$194,507Philanthropy$93,725Food & Nutrition$40,000Other$11,350Youth Development$8,550Human Services$4,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA11.7× affinity11 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Servant Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation REACH NOW INTERNATIONAL INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: CHILDRENS HUNGER FUND LEGACY FOUND.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~7 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 11.4× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 911851417 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on CHILDRENS HUNGER FUND LEGACY FOUND, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 7 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 9% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Reach Now International Inc?
Find your warmest path to Reach Now International Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines