Skip to content

· Private foundation

Re Swager Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$68k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$8k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Re Swager Family Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to The Minneapolis Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year Re Swager Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 15 organizations, $68k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

13
’17
12
’19
15
’20
14
’21
16
’22
15
’23
15
’24
0
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$191kHealth$96kPhilanthropy$85kHousing & Shelter$50kHuman Services$44kEducation$35kAnimals$5kReligion$3k
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$4,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$8,000
MINNEAPOLIS INSTITUTE OF ARTS$6,500
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$5,000
ST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$5,000
PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK$4,500
MACPHAIL CENTER FOR MUSIC$4,000
ALLINA HEALTH FOUNDATION$4,000
MINNESOTA ORCHESTRA$4,000
FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC$4,000
SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN$4,000
HIGHPOINT CENTER FOR PRINTMAKING$3,500
PAGE EDUCATION FOUNDATION$3,500
THE SAINT PAUL CHAMBER ORCHESTRA$3,000
MINNESOTA CENTER FOR BOOK ARTS$3,000
TWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $5k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $5k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $4k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $3k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $3k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IN
CA
MD
TN
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$415k · 21 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against -37% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call). Read against FY2024, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
2

Total granted

$415k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
-37%

Still filing today

81%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHealthAnimalsHuman ServicesReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    TWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    7× · 2017–2024 · $50k · revenue +80%
  • MS
    MINNEAPOLIS SOCIETY OF FINE ARTS DBA MINNEAPOLIS INSTITUTE OF ARTS
    7× · 2017–2024 · $42k · revenue +65%
  • PE
    PAGE EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2024 · $35k · revenue +69%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $4k
  • LO
    Lutheran Outdoor Ministries Indiana- Kentucky Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minnesota Public Radio American Public Media

The mission of minnesota public radio is creating the future of public media by amplifying voices to inform, include, and inspire.

Arts & Culture
2
Minneapolis College of Art and Design

Mcad provides a transformative education within a community of support for creative students of all backgrounds to work, collaborate, and lead with confidence in a dynamic, interconnected world.

Education
3
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
4
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
5
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
6
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and Industry

The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…

—
7
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
8
Minnesota Council on Foundations

MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.

—
9
Minneapolis Downtown Council

To create an extraordinary downtown minneapolis, applying the core values of leadership, collaboration, advocacy and innovation.

—
10
The Minneapolis Club

The minneapolis club is a private city club that brings together an engaged community of talented and diverse people, connecting them socially and professionally through extraordinary experiences.

Recreation & Sports
11
Minneapolis Regional Chamber of Commerce

Creating powerful advocacy to enhance economic vitality in the minneapolis-st. paul region.

—
12
Minnesota Fringe Festival

Minnesota fringe connects adventurous artists with adventurous audiences by creating open, supportive forums for free and diverse artistic expression.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Minneapolis Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Ashleys Kitten Academy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
10/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MINNEAPOLIS SOCIETY OF FINE ARTS DBA MINNEAPOLIS INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $42,000 · Arts & CultureMINNEAPOLIS SOCIETY OF FINE ARTS DBA MIN…Highpoint Center for Printmaking: $30,000 · Arts & CultureHighpoint Center for PrintmakingMINNESOTA ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION: $24,500 · Arts & CultureMINNESOTA ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATIONMACPHAIL CENTER FOR MUSIC: $24,000 · Arts & CultureMACPHAIL CENTER FOR MUSICMINNESOTA CENTER FOR BOOK ARTS: $21,000 · Arts & CultureMINNESOTA CENTER FOR BOOK ARTSAMERICAN CRAFT COUNCIL: $20,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN CRAFT COUNCILNORTHERN CLAY CENTER: $18,000 · Arts & CultureNORTHERN CLAY CENTER+1 more: $2,000 · Arts & CultureTWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $50,000 · OtherTWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITYPAGE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $35,000 · OtherPAGE EDUCATION FOUNDATIONST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $27,500 · OtherST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPIT…FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $22,500 · OtherFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INCPIPER CANCER INSTITUTE: $11,500 · OtherPIPER CANCER INSTITUTETHE SAINT PAUL CHAMBER ORCHESTRA: $9,000 · OtherTHE SAINT PAUL CHAMBER ORCHESTRAVIRGINIA PIPER CANCER INSTITUTE: $6,000 · Other+1 more: $3,500 · OtherTHE MINNEAPOLIS FOUNDATION: $85,000 · PhilanthropyTHE MINNEAPOLIS FO…THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $26,500 · HealthTHE SHRINE…PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $13,000 · HealthPANCREATIC…ALLINA HEALTH FOUNDATION: $8,000 · HealthALLINA HEA…WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $21,500 · Human ServicesBITTY KITTY BRIGADE: $3,750 · AnimalsAshleys Kitten Academy: $750 · AnimalsORPHAN KITTEN CLUB INC: $750 · AnimalsLutheran Outdoor Ministries Indiana- Kentucky Inc: $3,000 · Religion
Arts & Culture$181,500Other$165,000Philanthropy$85,000Health$47,500Human Services$21,500Animals$5,250Religion$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE MINNEAPOLIS FOUNDATION: $85,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $50,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMINNEAPOLIS SOCIETY OF FINE ARTS DBA MINNEAPOLIS INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $42,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPAGE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetHighpoint Center for Printmaking: $30,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $26,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMINNESOTA ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION: $24,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMACPHAIL CENTER FOR MUSIC: $24,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $22,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $21,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMINNESOTA CENTER FOR BOOK ARTS: $21,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN CRAFT COUNCIL: $20,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHERN CLAY CENTER: $18,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $13,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALLINA HEALTH FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBITTY KITTY BRIGADE: $3,750 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAshleys Kitten Academy: $750 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetORPHAN KITTEN CLUB INC: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE MINNEAPOLIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds MINNEAPOLIS SOCIETY OF FINE ARTS DBA MINNEAPOLIS INSTITUTE OF ARTS ↗
  • Who funds PAGE EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Highpoint Center for Printmaking ↗
  • Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds MINNESOTA ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds MACPHAIL CENTER FOR MUSIC ↗
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds MINNESOTA CENTER FOR BOOK ARTS ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CRAFT COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN CLAY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLINA HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BITTY KITTY BRIGADE ↗
  • Who funds Lutheran Outdoor Ministries Indiana- Kentucky Inc ↗
  • Who funds TWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION INC ↗
  • Who funds Ashleys Kitten Academy ↗
  • Who funds ORPHAN KITTEN CLUB INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mightycause Charitable FoundationFL13.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Re Swager Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Re Swager Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Re Swager Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Re Swager Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Re Swager Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph