Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rc Johnson Jr Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$225k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Health$395kHuman Services$290kEducation$254kInternational$145kFood & Nutrition$80kArts & Culture$66kReligion$46kAnimals$45kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $132k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$60,056
UMC CHILDRENS MIRACLE NETWORK$34,835
TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION$25,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
A PLACE TO CALL HOME$16,880
REESE'S PURPOSE$15,000
SOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK$10,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$10,000
LUBBOCK IMPACT$7,840
HEART SUPPORT INC$7,500
PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES AND S$5,000
SAN JUAN MOUNTAIN ADVENTURES$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
DUCKS UNLIMITED$2,420
Individual grant recipient$339
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $118k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAS MIGHTY WARRIORS: $25k → 11%FOSTER A LIFE: $10k → 17%A PLACE TO CALL HOME: $17k → 17%LUBBOCK IMPACT: $8k → 17%COMMUNITY PARTNERS OF LUBBOCK: $20k → 17%CHILDREN'S HOME OF LUBBOCK: $15k → 17%TEXAS BOYS RANCH: $10k → 17%CHILDREN'S HOME OF LUBBOCK: $8k → 17%CHILDRENS HOME OF LUBBOCK: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

CA
CO
VA
AZ
NM
TN
NC
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 17 repeat orgs$455k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +66% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
25

Total granted

$1.1M
$388k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+66%
+8%

Still filing today

59%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $67k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthPhilanthropyReligionArts & CultureAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TT
    TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $148k · revenue +27%
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    6× · 2018–2024 · $135k · revenue +163%
  • UF
    UMC FOUNDATION
    3× · 2018–2020 · $127k · revenue +71%

Funded once

  • MF
    MALTA FARMS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $51k · revenue +33%
  • TH
    TTU HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
  • CO
    CASA OF THE SOUTH PLAINS INC
    one grant, 2021 · $40k · revenue +6%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Health Center of Lubbock Inc

Provide quality primary and preventataive health care services to those in need.

Health
2
Lone Star Sanctuary for Animals Inc

Shelter, food and veterniary care provided for animals in a clean shelter environment. this is a no-kill facility. animals are neutered, vaccinated, microchipped prior to being adopted. every effort is made to educate the community about…

Animals
3
Lubbock Family Outreach Center Inc Dba Family Guidance & Outreach Center

The Family Guidance & Outreach Center of Lubbock is dedicated to the prevention of child abuse and neglect and supporting, mentoring, and educating parents.

Human Services
4
West Texas Hero Homes Inc

Support of special needs military or first responders and their families.

Housing & Shelter
5
Lone Star Casa Inc

Lone Star CASA elevates the voices of children in Kaufman and Rockwall County who have experienced abuse and neglect by providing trained volunteer advocates to work alongside children and families so they can achieve safety and stability…

Civil Rights
6
Goodwill Industries of Lubbock Contract Services Inc

Goodwill is a local nonprofit helping people overcome challenges, build skills, find jobs and grow careers.

Employment
7
Goodwill Industries of Lubbock Inc

Goodwill is a local nonprofit helping people overcome challenges, build skills, find jobs and grow careers.

Employment
8
Let Love Live

Let love live's mission is to rescue, rehabilitate, and rehome animals in need, ensuring they receive the love, care, and respect they deserve.

Animals
9
Lubbock Area United Way Inc

Giving people hope. working to address the root issues of the significant challenges facing our south plains communities to create lasting, positive change.

Philanthropy
10
Texas Rescue Inc
Animals
11
Ywca of Lubbock Legacy Fund Inc

The ywca of lubbock legacy fund inc. is dedicated to meeting the needs of the ywca of lubbock in supporting the community through its mission of eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, freedom, and dignity for…

Philanthropy
12
Central Texas Spca

Rescue neglected, unwanted homeless dogs and cats nurture and provide shelter until they are placed with a forever family strive to reduce animal overpopulation prevent cruelty to animals teach responsible pet ownership through an outreach…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa of the South Plains Inc; the most unlike its peers is Covenant Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
18/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $120,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY: $75,000 · OtherTEXAS TECH UNIVERSITYUMC CHILDRENS MIRACLE NETWORK: $68,075 · OtherUMC CHILDRENS MIRACLE NETWORKTTU HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER: $50,000 · OtherTTU HEALTH SCIENCES CENTERIndividual grant recipient: $40,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBALLET LUBBOCK: $40,000 · OtherBALLET LUBBOCK+26 more: $237,717 · Other+26 moreAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $194,511 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY …UMC FOUNDATION: $126,500 · HealthUMC FOUNDATION+1 more: $6,000 · HealthTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC: $147,500 · EducationTEXAS TECH…SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $135,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'…STONES CRY OUT INTERNATIONAL: $10,000 · ReligionSTONES CRY…CHILDREN'S HOME OF LUBBOCK AND FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY INC: $28,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'…AMERICA'S MIGHTY WARRIORS: $25,000 · Human ServicesAMERICA'S…COMMUNITY PARTNERS OF LUBBOCK: $20,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY…A PLACE TO CALL HOME: $16,880 · Human ServicesA PLACE T…FOSTERALIFE: $10,475 · Human ServicesFOSTERALI…TEXAS GIRLS AND BOYS RANCH: $10,000 · Human ServicesTEXAS GIR…REFUGE SERVICES INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesREFUGE SE…LUBBOCK IMPACT INC: $7,840 · Human ServicesLUBBOCK I…MALTA FARMS INC: $50,653 · Crime & LegalCASA OF THE SOUTH PLAINS INC: $40,000 · Crime & LegalRONALD McDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER NORTH TEXAS INC: $40,730 · PhilanthropyCOVENANT FOUNDATION INC: $16,050 · PhilanthropyADOPT A PLATOON SOLDIER SUPPORT EFFORT INC: $14,800 · Philanthropy
Other$630,792Health$327,011Education$147,500Religion$145,000Human Services$128,195Crime & Legal$90,653Philanthropy$71,580

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $194,511 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC: $147,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $135,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUMC FOUNDATION: $126,500 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetMALTA FARMS INC: $50,653 over 1y, 15% of budgetRONALD McDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER NORTH TEXAS INC: $40,730 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetCASA OF THE SOUTH PLAINS INC: $40,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetBALLET LUBBOCK: $40,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOME OF LUBBOCK AND FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY INC: $28,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICA'S MIGHTY WARRIORS: $25,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetPets for Vets Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS OF LUBBOCK: $20,000 over 1y, 35% of budgetHEARTSUPPORT INC: $17,980 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetA PLACE TO CALL HOME: $16,880 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetCOVENANT FOUNDATION INC: $16,050 over 2y, 95% of budgetREESE'S PURPOSE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetADOPT A PLATOON SOLDIER SUPPORT EFFORT INC: $14,800 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFOSTERALIFE: $10,475 over 1y, 32% of budgetHEALTH VOLUNTEERS OVERSEAS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTEXAS GIRLS AND BOYS RANCH: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPET A BULLS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetLUBBOCK WOMEN'S CLUB: $8,415 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLUBBOCK IMPACT INC: $7,840 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetOPERATION WALK- WOMEN ORTHOPAEDIST GLOBAL OUTREACH: $6,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetSAVING GRACE RESCUE LBK: $5,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetDucks Unlimited Inc: $2,420 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Diekemper Family Foundation IncTX24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Diekemper Family Foundation Inc · Ch Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of West Texas · HDS Foundation · Kuykendall Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · South Plains Foundation · Asco Foundation · Alliance Credit Union Foundation · Matthew 633 Foundation · Terry & Kelly Crofoot Foundation · Mary L Livermore Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rc Johnson Jr Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rc Johnson Jr Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Rc Johnson Jr Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Rc Johnson Jr Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rc Johnson Jr’s filings →

    More from the funding graph