Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Alliance Credit Union Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$53k
Granted FY2024still arriving
33
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Education$76kHuman Services$19kAnimals$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kFood & Nutrition$5kRecreation & Sports$2kReligion$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$48k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COVENANT SCHOOL OF NURSING$4,000
SOUTH PLAINS COLLEGE$4,000
COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS$3,164
Individual grant recipient$3,084
SOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK$3,030
LUBBOCK CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY$3,000
CASA OF THE SOUTH PLAINS$2,981
5-5-5 INITIATIVE$2,500
NATIONAL FALLEN FIREFIGHTERS FOUNDATION$2,500
HOWARD COLLEGE$2,000
RANDALL HIGH SCHOOL$1,000
CANYON HIGH SCHOOL$1,000
PALO DURO HIGH SCHOOL$1,000
REESE EDUCATION CENTER$1,000
TALKINGTON SCHOOL FOR YOUNG WOMEN LEADERS$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–23, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Texas Boys Ranch: $2k → 20%EARLY LEARNING CENTERS OF LUBBOCK: $3k → 17%CHILDRENS HOME OF LUBBOCK: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$94k · 18 repeat orgs$64k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
13

Total granted

$94k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+19%

Still filing today

11%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 32% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationFood & NutritionCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2021–2023 · $39k
  • WP
    WOMEN'S PROTECTIVE SERVICES
    2× · 2022–2023 · $6k · revenue +20%
  • SP
    SOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK INC
    2× · 2021–2024 · $5k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • FP
    FAMILY PROMISE
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • TH
    THE HAVEN ANIMAL RESCUE
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • EL
    EARLY LEARNING CENTERS OF LUBBOCK INC
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +19%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lubbock Family Outreach Center Inc Dba Family Guidance & Outreach Center

The Family Guidance & Outreach Center of Lubbock is dedicated to the prevention of child abuse and neglect and supporting, mentoring, and educating parents.

Human Services
2
Community Health Center of Lubbock Inc

Provide quality primary and preventataive health care services to those in need.

Health
3
Lubbock Christian School

Lubbock christian school is dedicated to providing a quality environment in which each student will grow in wisdom and stature and in favor with god and man. lcs strives for excellence spiritually, personally, and professionally among…

Education
4
Children's Advocacy Center of the South Plains

To bring together community resources to speed the healing of child victims of abuse and trauma.

Crime & Legal
5
Lubbock Area United Way Inc

Giving people hope. working to address the root issues of the significant challenges facing our south plains communities to create lasting, positive change.

Philanthropy
6
West Texas Food Bank

The WTFB exists to collect, purchase, and distribute food to feed the hungry in 19 counties in West Texas in partnership with volunteers and community organizations and to educate these partners and the public at large about the real face…

7
Texprotects-the Texas Association for the Protection of Children

TexProtects advances public policy and local implementation to strenghten families to prevent child abuse and neglect.

Youth Development
8
Family Legal Services of the South Plains

The family legal services of the south plains works to provide low income clients of the south plains with first-rate legal assistance, advocacy, and quality counsel in matters of family and elder law at free and/or reduced cost.

Crime & Legal
9
Young Women's Christian Association of Lubbock

The young women's christian association of lubbock is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women and promoting peace, justice, freedom, and dignity for all.

10
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
11
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
12
Children's Home Foundation Inc

The children's home foundation exists to secure and manage funds for the sole benefit of the children's home of lubbock. through a mission of safekeeping and wise management, the directors of the children's home foundation pledge their…

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa of the South Plains Inc and the most unlike its peers is National Fallen Firefighters Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $38,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+40 more — $93,054 · Other+40 moreWOMEN'S PROTECTIVE SERVICES — $6,135 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S P…EARLY LEARNING CENTERS OF LUBBOCK INC — $2,581 · Human ServicesEARLY LEA…CHILDREN'S HOME OF LUBBOCK AND FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY INC — $2,550 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'…TEXAS GIRLS AND BOYS RANCH — $1,719 · Human ServicesTEXAS GIR…LUBBOCK CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY — $3,000 · EducationTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 · EducationSOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK INC — $4,986 · Food & NutritionCASA OF THE SOUTH PLAINS INC — $2,981 · Crime & Legal
Other$131,554Human Services$12,985Education$5,000Food & Nutrition$4,986Crime & Legal$2,981

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWOMEN'S PROTECTIVE SERVICES — $6,135 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK INC — $4,986 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLUBBOCK CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASA OF THE SOUTH PLAINS INC — $2,981 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEARLY LEARNING CENTERS OF LUBBOCK INC — $2,581 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOME OF LUBBOCK AND FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY INC — $2,550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL FALLEN FIREFIGHTERS FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WOMEN'S PROTECTIVE SERVICES
  • Who funds SOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds LUBBOCK CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds CASA OF THE SOUTH PLAINS INC
  • Who funds EARLY LEARNING CENTERS OF LUBBOCK INC
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOME OF LUBBOCK AND FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL FALLEN FIREFIGHTERS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds TEXAS GIRLS AND BOYS RANCH

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

HDS FoundationTX20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: HDS Foundation · Diekemper Family Foundation Inc · Ch Foundation Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · Kuykendall Foundation · Mary L Livermore Foundation · South Plains Foundation · Daji Foundation · Welborn-Payne Endowment Trust · Rc Johnson Jr Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of West Texas · Xcel Energy Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Alliance Credit Union Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 24%
  • National Fallen Firefighters Foundation24% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Alliance Credit Union Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Alliance Credit Union Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph