Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ray & Lorraine Friedman Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$71k
Granted FY2025still arriving
34
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$220kHuman Services$126kHealth$107kEducation$60kPhilanthropy$47kCivil Rights$43kArts & Culture$20kYouth Development$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k32 grants · $51k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$1,071
Median grant
1
States reached
$183k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HADASSAH$10,000
CHRYSALIS$10,000
TEMPLE JUDEA$6,260
ROLFE PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION$4,300
HIRSHBERG FOUNDATION$4,000
CEDARS SINAI MEDICAL CENTER$4,000
UCLA FOUNDATION$3,930
HELP GROUP$2,500
JOHNS HOPKINS MEDICAL SCHOOL$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,250
FRIENDS OF THE IDF$1,800
CHABAD OF NORTH RANCH$1,800
USC GOULD SCHOOL OF LAW$1,250
EVERYMOM CHICAGO$1,250
Individual grant recipient$1,250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%MEET EACH NEED WITH DIGNITY: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $750 → 14%GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $500 → 14%MEET EACH NEED WITH DIGNITY: $500 → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $500 → 14%MEET EACH NEED WITH DIGNITY: $500 → 14%MEET EACH NEED WITH DIGNITY: $500 → 14%LOS ANGELES HOUSE OF RUTH: $400 → 14%GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA: $200 → 14%GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $200 → 14%GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $200 → 14%GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $200 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $50 → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $50 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$635k · 90 repeat orgs$104k to everyone else

90 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2025, 66 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

90
114

Total granted

$635k
$86k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+57%

Still filing today

36%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthAnimalsHuman ServicesInternationalEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER
    7× · 2019–2025 · $49k · revenue +50%
  • CA
    CONNECTING A CARING COMMUNITY
    8× · 2017–2025 · $13k · revenue +800%
  • PF
    POINT FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2024 · $7k · revenue +108%

Funded once

  • AI
    AMCHA Initiativegraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue +62%
  • CS
    CEDARS SINAI MEDICALL CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $12k
  • SR
    STUDENTS RUN LOS ANGELES
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
3
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
4
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
5
Doheny Eye Institute

To further the conservation, improvement and restoration of human eyesight" (mrs. doheny - 1947).

—
6
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
7
Lung Cancer Research Foundation

The mission of the lung cancer research foundation is to improve lung cancer outcomes by funding research for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and cure of lung cancer.

Health
8
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
9
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
10
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
11
Brightfocus Foundation

Brightfocus foundation funds exceptional research worldwide to defeat alzheimer's disease, macular degeneration, and glaucoma and provides expert information on these heartbreaking diseases. please refer to schedule o for a complete…

Health
12
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Karp Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

62 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 62 of the 217 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
60/62
Grantees still filing
49/62
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HADASSAH: $120,324 · OtherHADASSAHTEMPLE JUDEA: $75,930 · OtherTEMPLE JUDEAETHOS CALIFORNIA: $35,200 · OtherETHOS CALIFORNIAIndividual grant recipient: $33,215 · OtherIndividual grant recipientASSOC IMC: $28,615 · OtherLOS ANGELES JEWISH HOME: $27,472 · OtherHELP GROUP: $23,900 · Other+159 more: $265,847 · Other+159 moreCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $48,700 · HealthCEDARS-SI…American Diabetes Association: $6,050 · HealthAmerican …+9 more: $8,850 · Health+9 moreUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $43,100 · EducationPOINT FOUNDATION: $7,000 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATION: $3,930 · Education+2 more: $1,450 · EducationAMCHA Initiative: $20,000 · Civil RightsANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $6,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $5,000 · Civil RightsCONNECTING A CARING COMMUNITY: $13,200 · Youth Development+1 more: $300 · Youth DevelopmentFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $2,800 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $2,475 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $2,000 · International+3 more: $650 · InternationalTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $2,250 · AnimalsGREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION: $1,350 · AnimalsWILDLIFE WAYSTATION: $850 · AnimalsPET ADOPTION FUND: $750 · AnimalsNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $250 · AnimalsPASADENA HUMANE: $250 · AnimalsROAR FOUNDATION: $200 · Animals
Other$610,503Health$63,600Education$55,480Civil Rights$31,000Youth Development$13,500International$7,925Animals$5,900

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $48,700 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $43,100 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetETHOS CALIFORNIA: $35,200 over 5y, 24% of budgetAMCHA Initiative: $20,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetCONNECTING A CARING COMMUNITY: $13,200 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetPOINT FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $6,050 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $5,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $3,930 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $2,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEND - Meet Each Need With Dignity: $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $2,475 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $2,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEBA MEDICAL CENTER INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $1,950 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMOTHERS AGAINST DRUNK DRIVING: $1,900 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $1,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $1,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $1,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION: $1,350 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR EARLY EDUCATION: $1,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $1,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILDLIFE WAYSTATION: $850 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPET ADOPTION FUND: $750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM ASSOCIATES: $560 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMUSIC FOR AUTISM: $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetKIND INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN YOUTH SYMPHONY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL ADVISORY COUNCIL OF GREATER LONG BEACH AND WEST ORANGE COUNTY INC: $400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLOS ANGELES HOUSE OF RUTH: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MIRMAN SCHOOL FOR GIFTED CHILDREN: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPASADENA HUMANE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTREEPEOPLE INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Guiding Eyes Inc DBA Guide Dogs of America: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds ETHOS CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds AMCHA Initiative ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTING A CARING COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds POINT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds MEND - Meet Each Need With Dignity ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foundation of Los AngelesCA14.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · The Ahmanson Foundation · California Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ray & Lorraine Friedman Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ray & Lorraine Friedman Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ray & Lorraine Friedman Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Ray & Lorraine Friedman Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 217 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ray & Lorraine Friedman Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph