Skip to content

· Private foundation

Randall Scott Blann Fdn

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$34k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Human Services$181kInternational$150kReligion$95kFood & Nutrition$70kPublic Safety & Disaster$51kHealth$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$4,796
Median grant
4
States reached
$605k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Falls County Samaritan House$4,796
American Red Cross$4,796
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$4,796
TEXAS POLICE CHIEFS ASSOCIATION$4,796
100 Club of Heart of Texas$4,796
SALVATION ARMY NATIONAL CORP$4,796
Southern Baptists of Texas Convention$4,796
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $5k → 11%Falls County Samaritan House: $16k → 21%American Red Cross: $16k → 14%Falls County Samaritan House: $5k → 21%American Red Cross: $5k → 14%CARITAS OF WACO: $20k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

PA
CA
KY
VA
KS
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

25%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$156k · 7 repeat orgs$476k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
19

Total granted

$156k
$476k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
0%

Still filing today

71%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalReligionFood & NutritionPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    2× · 2020–2025 · $25k · revenue +50%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    2× · 2024–2025 · $20k · revenue +3%
  • 1C
    100 CLUB OF THE HEART OF TEXAS
    2× · 2024–2025 · $20k · revenue +177%

Funded once

  • DIRECT RELIEF
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +20%
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +106%
  • NA
    NORTH AMERICAN MISSION BOARD OF THE SOUTHERN BAPTIST CONVENTION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tallapoosa Christian Crisis Center

To show christs love through tangible means, food, etc

Human Services
2
San Saba Volunteer Fire Department

To protect the lives and property of the citizens of the city and county of San Saba, Texas.

Public Safety & Disaster
3
Dallas Volunteer Fire Dept

To protect lives and property

—
4
Texas 635

To provide immediate funds and family services.

Human Services
5
Clarksville Food Pantry Inc

Provide meals for needy citizens

Human Services
6
Texas Department of Public Safety Foundation

The texas department of public safety foundation is a community-focused nonprofit organization that develops innovative projects to support dps officers and employees through community connections, educational advancement, service…

Education
7
Texas County Food Pantry Inc

To respond to the legitimate needs of the people who request assistance for the basic human needs of food, clothing, healthcare, and shelter.

Unclassified
8
Navarro County Food Pantry

Provide food for needy people in county

—
9
Disaster Assistance Coc Inc

National nbsp;disaster nbsp;assistance nbsp;serve nbsp;meals nbsp;provide nbsp;water nbsp;clean nbsp;up nbsp;assistance nbsp;furniture nbsp;clothing nbsp;and nbsp;bible nbsp;studies nbsp;repair nbsp;and nbsp;rebuild nbsp;churches nbsp;and…

Public Safety & Disaster
10
Brazos Church Pantry Inc

Collection of food to provide to needy people in brazos, county, texas

—
11
Good Samaritan Christian Service Inc of Dalhart Texas

To provide clotihing, utility and food assistance to residents of dallam & hartley county texas that are in need.

Human Services
12
Southern Brooks Volunteer Fire Departmen

Fire, medical and other emergency first responders servicing rural brooks county in south texas

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SALVATION ARMY NATIONAL CORP: $29,796 · OtherSALVATION ARMY NATIONAL CORPNORTH AMERICAN MISSION BOARD OF THE SOUTHERN BAPTIST CONVENTION INC: $25,000 · OtherNORTH AMERICAN MISSION BOARD OF THE SOUTHERN BAPTIST …FRANKLIN CHURCH OF CHRIST: $25,000 · OtherFRANKLIN CHURCH OF CHRISTTHE SALVATION ARMY EIN 22-2406433: $25,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY EIN 22-2406433Individual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSALVATION ARMY - GREATER HOUSTON AREA COMMAND: $25,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY - GREATER HOUSTON AREA COMMANDTEXAS POLICE CHIEFS ASSOCIATION: $20,326 · OtherTEXAS POLICE CHIEFS ASSOCIATIONSOUTHERN BAPTISTS OF TEXAS CONVENTION INC: $20,326 · OtherSOUTHERN BAPTISTS OF TEXAS CONVENTION INCIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWOUNDED WARRIORS: $15,530 · OtherSALVATION ARMY: $15,530 · OtherWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT EIN 20-2370934: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherSHRINERS HOSPITALS EIN36-2193608: $10,000 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELS WACO: $25,000 · Human ServicesMEALS ON WHEELS WACOCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJE…WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $24,796 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INCAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $20,326 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross…100 CLUB OF THE HEART OF TEXAS: $20,326 · Human Services100 CLUB OF THE HEART OF TE…FALLS COUNTY SAMARITAN HOUSE: $20,326 · Human ServicesFALLS COUNTY SAMARITAN HOUS…CARITAS OF WACO: $20,000 · Human ServicesCARITAS OF WACODIRECT RELIEF: $100,000 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEFSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $50,000 · ReligionLorena Shepherds Heart: $20,000 · Food & NutritionROSS VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $10,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$296,508Human Services$155,774International$100,000Religion$50,000Food & Nutrition$20,000Public Safety & Disaster$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS WACO: $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $24,796 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $20,326 over 2y, 0.0% of budget100 CLUB OF THE HEART OF TEXAS: $20,326 over 2y, 10% of budgetFALLS COUNTY SAMARITAN HOUSE: $20,326 over 2y, 24% of budgetTEXAS POLICE CHIEFS ASSOCIATION: $20,326 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCARITAS OF WACO: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS WACO ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds 100 CLUB OF THE HEART OF TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds FALLS COUNTY SAMARITAN HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS POLICE CHIEFS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Lorena Shepherds Heart ↗
  • Who funds CARITAS OF WACO ↗
  • Who funds ROSS VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Randall Scott Blann Fdn funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Randall Scott Blann Fdn. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Randall Scott Blann Fdn’s filings →

More from the funding graph