Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Randall & Rebecca Craig Family Foundatio N C/O Randall Craig

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$297k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$149k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 50% of RANDALL & REBECCA CRAIG FAMILY FOUNDATIO N C/O RANDALL CRAIG’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $850
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $296k
$50
Median grant
6
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LIVING WORD CHRISTIAN CHURCH$149,383
SWIRCA & MORE$146,384
SONLIGHT MINISTRIES$550
RIGHT TO LIFE OF SOUTHWEST INDIANA$50
ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM$50
THIN BLUE 1ST$50
NRA FOUNDATION$25
SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN$25
CHRISTIAN LEGAL SOCIETY$25
HILLSDALE COLLEGE$25
AMERICAN FAMILY ASSOCIATION$25
GOOD NEWS JAIL & PRISON MINISTRY$25
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $274k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $150 → 14%SWIRCA & MORE: $146k → 15%SWIRCA & MORE: $35k → 15%SWIRCA & MORE: $35k → 15%SWIRCA & MORE: $25k → 15%SWIRCA & MORE: $12k → 15%SWIRCA & MORE: $11k → 15%SWIRCA & MORE: $6k → 15%SWIRCA & MORE: $4k → 15%SWIRCA & MORE: $900 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$642k · 26 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

26 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
15

Total granted

$642k
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
0%

Still filing today

58%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Civil RightsReligionHuman ServicesHealthCrime & LegalArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SI
    SOUTHWESTERN INDIANA REGIONAL COUNCIL ON AGING INC DBA SWIRCA & MORE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $274k · revenue +51%
  • RT
    RIGHT TO LIFE OF SOUTHWEST INDIANA
    9× · 2017–2025 · $32k · revenue +27%
  • ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM
    9× · 2017–2025 · $5k · revenue +134%

Funded once

  • LW
    LIVING WORD CHRISITAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
  • AB
    AMERICAN BAPTIST EAST INC
    one grant, 2017 · $14k
  • BC
    BETHEL CHURCH
    one grant, 2024 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indiana Statewide Independent Living Council Inc

To empower its peers with disabilities to lead and control their own lives.

Human Services
2
Indiana Legal Services Inc

The mission of ILS is to use the law to fight poverty and racism, empower clients, and improve access to justice.

Crime & Legal
3
Leadership Indianapolis Inc

Educate, Inspire, Connect and Mobilize Community Leaders to serve and strengthen greater Indianapolis.

Public Benefit
4
Enroll Indy Inc

Enroll indy helps families choose schools that meet their children's needs by providing a one-stop enrollment process, school information that is relevant and easy to understand, and data to inform school improvement in indianapolis,…

Education
5
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
6
Indiana Civil Liberties Union of Indiana Inc

To defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties that the constitution and laws of the united states guarantee everyone in this country.

7
The Indiana Civil Liberties Union Foundation Inc

The american civil liberties union of indiana seeks to promote, protect, and defend the rights, liberties, and freedoms guaranteed to all people in our state by the united states and indiana constitutions.

Civil Rights
8
Southern Indiana Community Health Care

To provide high-quality, comprehensive, community-sensitive health care utilizing christ-oriented principles. rooted in our faith-driven values, sichc serves as a pillar for accessible, comprehensive care of the whole person and a catalyst…

Health
9
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

10
Indiana Right to Life Incorporated

To educate the public about abortion

11
Pro Bono Indiana Inc

To promote equal access to justice for all indiana residents regardless of economic status

Health
12
Indiana Organ Procurement Organization Inc

In 2024, indiana organ procurement organization d.b.a indiana network facilitated 1388 organ transplants from 509 organ donors leading to 1,216 lives saved. additionally, 1,669 tissue and cornea donors gave the gift of healing and sight,…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadySenior Support ServicesFallen First Responder Supp…Education Equity LeadershipVeteran Support ServicesYouth Development CentersClassical Music EnsemblesElementary Literacy TutoringFood Pantries & AssistanceChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Developmental Disabilities …Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community Health CentersGovernment Accountability R…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%0%<5yr13%5%5–10yr18%9%10–20yr14%14%20–35yr13%41%35–55yr23%32%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr18%0%10–20yr14%2%20–35yr13%89%35–55yr23%9%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/30
the rest of the field
10%
4,324/41,965

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/23
Grantees still filing
16/23
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LIVING WORD CHRISTIAN CHURCH — $253,574 · OtherLIVING WORD CHRISTIAN CHURCHSONLIGHT MINISTRIES — $19,130 · OtherSONLIGHT MINISTRIESEVANSVILLE BAR FOUNDATION — $18,000 · OtherLIVING WORD CHRISITAN CHURCH — $14,757 · OtherAMERICAN BAPTIST EAST INC — $14,256 · Other+25 more — $25,374 · Other+25 moreSOUTHWESTERN INDIANA REGIONAL COUNCIL ON AGING INC DBA SWIRCA & MORE — $274,190 · Human ServicesSOUTHWESTERN INDIANA REGIONAL COUNCIL ON AGIN…+1 more — $150 · Human ServicesRIGHT TO LIFE OF SOUTHWEST INDIANA — $32,400 · Civil RightsALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM — $5,400 · Civil Rights+1 more — $500 · Civil RightsAMERICAN FAMILY ASSOCIATION INC — $4,625 · ReligionTHIN BLUE 1ST INC — $2,700 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $1,500 · ReligionTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN — $3,875 · HealthEASTER SEALS REHABILITATION CENTER INC — $2,000 · HealthHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $3,975 · EducationWARRICK LITERACY AND EDUCATIONAL CONNECTIONS INC — $500 · EducationNRA FOUNDATION INC — $2,900 · Crime & Legal
Other$345,091Human Services$274,340Civil Rights$38,300Religion$8,825Health$5,875Education$4,475Crime & Legal$2,900

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSOUTHWESTERN INDIANA REGIONAL COUNCIL ON AGING INC DBA SWIRCA & MORE — $274,190 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetRIGHT TO LIFE OF SOUTHWEST INDIANA — $32,400 over 9y, 6.6% of budgetALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM — $5,400 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FAMILY ASSOCIATION INC — $4,625 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $3,975 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN — $3,875 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNRA FOUNDATION INC — $2,900 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHWEST INDIANA — $2,750 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHIN BLUE 1ST INC — $2,700 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetEASTER SEALS REHABILITATION CENTER INC — $2,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEVANSVILLE PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRAL — $1,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ONE INC — $1,150 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVANDERBURGH LAW LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF EVANSVILLE INC — $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMCCUTCHANVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT INC — $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRI-STATE FOOD BANK — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLeadership Institute — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEVANSVILLE RESCUE MISSION INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SOUTHWESTERN INDIANA REGIONAL COUNCIL ON AGING INC DBA SWIRCA & MORE
  • Who funds RIGHT TO LIFE OF SOUTHWEST INDIANA
  • Who funds ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM
  • Who funds AMERICAN FAMILY ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE
  • Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN
  • Who funds NRA FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHWEST INDIANA
  • Who funds THIN BLUE 1ST INC
  • Who funds EASTER SEALS REHABILITATION CENTER INC
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds EVANSVILLE PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRAL
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ONE INC
  • Who funds VANDERBURGH LAW LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF EVANSVILLE INC
  • Who funds WARRICK LITERACY AND EDUCATIONAL CONNECTIONS INC
  • Who funds Vanderburgh County CASA Inc
  • Who funds MCCUTCHANVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT INC
  • Who funds TRI-STATE FOOD BANK
  • Who funds Leadership Institute
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
  • Who funds EVANSVILLE RESCUE MISSION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Cecil a and Mabel Lene Hamman Foundation IncIN28.3× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Cecil a and Mabel Lene Hamman Foundation Inc · Community Foundation Alliance Inc · Centerpoint Energy Foundation Inc · Koch Foundation Inc · Holiday Management Foundation · Gerling Family Foundation Inc · Braun Family Foundation Inc co Jim Burger ONB Trust Co · Evansville Endowment Fund Inc · Welborn Baptist Foundation Inc · Elizabeth Albon Foundation Trust · Weitzel Family Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Randall & Rebecca Craig Family Foundatio N C/O Randall Craig funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 6%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children6% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Randall & Rebecca Craig Family Foundatio N C/O Randall Craig?

Find your warmest path to Randall & Rebecca Craig Family Foundatio N C/O Randall Craig through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph