Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Weitzel Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$24kHousing & Shelter$6kEnvironment$5kPhilanthropy$3kHealth$3kReligion$3kArts & Culture$1kFood & Nutrition$800Other$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$150
Median grant
3
States reached
$81k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF EVANSVILLE$2,750
DEPAUW UNIVERSITY$2,500
WALLOON LAKE ASSOCIATION & CONSERVANCY$625
WLCC FOUNDATION INC$500
EASTER SEALS REHABILITATION CENTER INC$250
PETOSKEY-HARBOR SPRINGS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$250
TRI-STATE FOOD BANK$250
AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS$150
DEACONESS GIBSON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$150
MCCUTCHANVILLE GARDEN CLUB INC$100
THE ARC OF EVANSVILLE$100
FRIENDS OF WILLARD LIBRARY INC$100
MCCUTCHANVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC$100
EVANSVILLE RESCUE MISSION INC$100
EVANSVILLE MUSEUM OF ARTS HISTORY & SCIENCE$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $450) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $150 → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $100 → 14%THE ARC OF EVANSVILLE: $100 → 15%THE ARC OF EVANSVILLE: $100 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$44k · 20 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
7

Total granted

$44k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+40%

Still filing today

75%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $350 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DePauw University
    7× · 2017–2025 · $19k · revenue +43%
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF EVANSVILLE
    4× · 2021–2025 · $5k · revenue +86%
  • EU
    Emory University
    3× · 2021–2024 · $2k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • SV
    ST VINCENT EVANSVILLE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
  • LT
    Little Traverse Conservancy Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $500 · revenue -11%
  • EU
    EMORY UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $500

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
2
Indiana University Health Foundation Inc

Indiana university health foundation leverages the power of philanthropy to support the iu health goal of making indiana one of the healthiest states in the nation.

Health
3
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

4
Indiana University Health Frankfort Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
5
Indiana University Health Care Associates Inc

To deliver preeminent medical care and service to our patients and communities through outstanding and innovative medical leadership and practice, while participating in and supporting excellence in education and research. We achieve this…

Health
6
Indiana University Health White Memorial Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
7
Edward Hospital

Edward Hospital follows the mission of Endeavor Health to "help everyone in our communities be their best."

Health
8
Evangel University

Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.

Education
9
Vanderbilt University

See Disclosure Above.

Education
10
Indiana University Health Bedford Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
11
Indiana University Health Jay Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
12
Indiana University Health Ball Memorial Physicians Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Easter Seals Rehabilitation Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Harbor Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAffordable Housing Developm…Food Pantries & AssistanceDevelopmental Disabilities …Community Health CentersCommunity FoundationsClassical Music EnsemblesCommunity Arts OrganizationsCancer Support OrganizationsLand Conservation Organizat…Independent K-8 SchoolsUnited Way FederationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 52 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number27%5%<5yr18%0%5–10yr21%18%10–20yr15%14%20–35yr9%18%35–55yr11%46%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value27%2%<5yr18%0%5–10yr21%9%10–20yr15%12%20–35yr9%17%35–55yr11%59%55yr+

The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 19% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/25
the rest of the field
19%
1,381/7,382

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
13/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DePauw University — $19,000 · EducationDePauw UniversityEmory University — $1,500 · EducationEmory UniversityEVANSVILLE DAY SCHOOL INC — $1,500 · EducationEVANSVILLE DAY SCHOOL INCWLCC FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 · Education+2 more — $350 · EducationASCENSION ST VINCENT EVV — $2,750 · OtherASCENSION ST VINCENT EVVCANCER PATHWAYS MIDWEST — $1,550 · OtherCANCER PATHWAYS MIDWESTST VINCENT EVANSVILLE FOUNDATION — $1,000 · OtherST VINCENT EVANSVILLE FO…TRI-STATE FOOD BANK — $800 · OtherTRI-STATE FOOD BANKEVANSVILLE RESCUE MISSION INC — $600 · OtherEVANSVILLE RESCUE MISSIO…EMORY UNIVERSITY — $500 · OtherEVANSVILLE MUSEUM — $500 · OtherHARBOR FUND INC — $450 · OtherLittle Traverse Conservancy Inc — $500 · Other+8 more — $1,600 · Other+8 moreHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF EVANSVILLE — $5,250 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR …WALLOON LAKE ASSOCIATION AND CONSERVANCY — $4,625 · Food & NutritionWALLOON LAK…UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWESTERN INDIANA INC — $1,500 · PhilanthropyPETOSKEY-HARBOR SPRINGS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $250 · PhilanthropyEASTER SEALS REHABILITATION CENTER INC — $750 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $50 · HealthEVANSVILLE PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRAL — $600 · Arts & CultureEVANSVILLE MUSEUM OF ARTS HISTORY & SCIENCE — $100 · Arts & Culture
Education$23,350Other$10,250Housing & Shelter$5,250Food & Nutrition$4,625Philanthropy$1,750Health$800Arts & Culture$700

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDePauw University — $19,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF EVANSVILLE — $5,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWALLOON LAKE ASSOCIATION AND CONSERVANCY — $4,625 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCANCER PATHWAYS MIDWEST — $1,550 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetEmory University — $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEVANSVILLE DAY SCHOOL INC — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SOUTHWESTERN INDIANA INC — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWLCC FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTRI-STATE FOOD BANK — $800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEASTER SEALS REHABILITATION CENTER INC — $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEVANSVILLE RESCUE MISSION INC — $600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEVANSVILLE PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRAL — $600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLittle Traverse Conservancy Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPETOSKEY-HARBOR SPRINGS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEVANSVILLE ARC INC — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMCCUTCHANVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT INC — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation Alliance IncIN25.9× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation Alliance Inc · Centerpoint Energy Foundation Inc · Cecil a and Mabel Lene Hamman Foundation Inc · Koch Foundation Inc · Braun Family Foundation Inc co Jim Burger ONB Trust Co · Gerling Family Foundation Inc · Randall & Rebecca Craig Family Foundatio N C/O Randall Craig · St Mary's Health Inc · Evansville Endowment Fund Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Spiro B & Patricia Culver Mitsos Foundation Inc · The Bower-Suhrheinrich Foundation Fifth Third

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Weitzel Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Weitzel Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Weitzel Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph