Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ralph S French Charitable

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$394k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$4.8MEducation$3.0MHuman Services$1.2MAnimals$1.2MHousing & Shelter$1.0MReligion$663kEmployment$631kArts & Culture$361kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k13 grants · $302k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $800k
  • $250k+1 grant · $394k
$40,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$26M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NYU COLLEGE OF MEDICINE$393,916
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING$149,566
PINGRY SCHOOL$149,566
ROSER MEMORIAL CHURCH$74,783
GOODWILL INDUSTRIES-$65,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$65,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF MANATEE CO$64,957
COMMUNITY COALITION ON HOMELESSNESS$60,913
TIDEWELL HOSPICE INC$60,000
WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER$60,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$50,000
BISHOP MUSEUM OF SCIENCE & NATURE$40,000
STATE COLLEGE OF FLORIDA$40,000
Individual grant recipient$35,000
SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS$33,265
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 42% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%VALLEY OUTREACH: $18k → 6%TAHOE YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $17k → 8%TIDEWELL HOSPICE INC: $60k → 9%VALLEY OUTREACH: $16k → 6%WESTERN COMMUNITIES ACTION NETWORK: $15k → 11%TAHOE YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $16k → 8%TIDEWELL HOSPICE INC: $65k → 9%VALLEY OUTREACH: $15k → 6%TIDEWELL HOSPICE INC: $60k → 9%VALLEY OUTREACH: $15k → 6%TIDEWELL HOSPICE INC: $60k → 9%VALLEY OUTREACH: $14k → 6%TIDEWELL HOSPICE INC: $60k → 9%VALLEY OUTREACH: $14k → 6%TIDEWELL HOSPICE INC: $55k → 9%VALLEY OUTREACH: $6k → 6%TIDEWELL HOSPICE INC: $55k → 9%TIDEWELL HOSPICE INC: $55k → 9%TIDEWELL HOSPICE INC: $55k → 9%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS: $55k → 10%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS: $55k → 10%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS: $50k → 10%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS: $50k → 10%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS: $50k → 10%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS: $50k → 10%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS: $40k → 10%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS: $40k → 10%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS: $33k → 10%CENTER OF ANNA MARIA ISLAND: $30k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
MI
NY
NV
NJ
CA
MD
SC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$13M · 28 repeat orgs$463k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
5

Total granted

$13M
$418k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+409%

Still filing today

50%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthAnimalsHousing & ShelterArts & CulturePublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    TIDEWELL HOSPICE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $525k · revenue +39%
  • SG
    Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $423k · revenue +146%
  • BM
    BISHOP MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND NATURE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $361k · revenue +136%

Funded once

  • CO
    COLLEGE OF MEDICINE
    one grant, 2017 · $346k
  • AH
    ANIMAL HUMANE SOCIETY
    one grant, 2017 · $28k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY LIBRARYgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $16k · revenue +64%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kitsap Humane Society

Providing positive life changing solutions to people and animals in need.

Animals
2
Lake Humane Society

Mission: to protect animals and build connections between pets and people through advocacy and education. vision: leading and guiding a humane lake county core values: compassion for pets and people. engagement through innovative programs,…

Animals
3
Noco Humane

Our mission is to further the compassionate safe and responsible relationship between animals and people.

Animals
4
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
5
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals of Northern Nv

Our mission is to be an innovative regional leader in responsible treatment of homeless dogs and cats, primarily through their rescue and placement in forever loving homes and by promoting spaying and neutering to control pet…

Unclassified
6
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Tampa Bay Florida Inc

Spca tampa bay is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization that operates pinellas county's only nonprofit for-all animal shelter assisting all animals in need, regardless of species or circumstance, at its 10-acre campus in largo. (continued on…

Animals
7
Jacksonville Humane Society Inc

The jacksonville humane society provides care, comfort and compassion to animals in need while engaging the hearts, hands and minds of our community to bring about an end to the killing of abandoned and orphaned shelter animals.

Animals
8
Humane Society of Tampa Bay Inc

The Humane Society of Tampa Bay is dedicated to ending animal homelessness and providing care and comfort for companion animals in need. Our vision is "Leading the way because every life counts". In 2025, we saved 10,631 animals.

Animals
9
Humane Society Silicon Valley

At humane society silicon valley, our mission is to save lives, keep families together, and create a better future for pets and their people.(see schedule o for continuation)

Animals
10
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

Animals
11
San Diego Humane Society and Spca

Create a more humane world by inspiring compassion, providing hope and advancing the welfare of animals and people.

Animals
12
Can Do Canines

Can do canines transforms people's lives by creating mutually beneficial partnerships with specially trained dogs.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Coalition on Homelessness dba Turning Points; the most unlike its peers is Mote Marine Laboratory Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
14/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NYU COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $3,145,467 · OtherNYU COLLEGE OF MEDICINECOLLEGE OF ENGINEERING: $1,325,112 · OtherCOLLEGE OF ENGINEERINGPINGRY SCHOOL: $1,325,111 · OtherPINGRY SCHOOLROSER MEMORIAL CHURCH: $662,556 · OtherROSER MEMORIAL CHURCHGOODWILL INDUSTRIES-: $630,920 · OtherGOODWILL INDUSTRIES-WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER: $527,500 · OtherWOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTERHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $505,495 · OtherHUMANE SOCIETY OF MANATEE CO: $479,957 · OtherCOLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $346,204 · Other+11 more: $883,833 · Other+11 moreTIDEWELL HOSPICE INC: $525,000 · Human ServicesTIDEWELL …Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc: $423,265 · Human ServicesSoutheast…Valley Outreach: $98,224 · Human ServicesValley Ou…+3 more: $77,765 · Human Services+3 moreAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $440,231 · HealthHOLD YOUR HORSES: $200,893 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $160,000 · HealthCommunity Coalition on Homelessness dba Turning Points: $521,810 · Housing & ShelterBISHOP MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND NATURE INC: $361,082 · Arts & CultureAMVETS NATIONAL SERVICE FOUNDATION: $295,000 · Public BenefitAnimal Humane Society: $157,898 · AnimalsDouglas Animal Welfare Group: $103,595 · AnimalsPEOPLE REACHING OUT TO OTHER PEOPLE INC: $24,205 · Food & Nutrition
Other$9,832,155Human Services$1,124,254Health$801,124Housing & Shelter$521,810Arts & Culture$361,082Public Benefit$295,000Animals$261,493Food & Nutrition$24,205

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTIDEWELL HOSPICE INC: $525,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCommunity Coalition on Homelessness dba Turning Points: $521,810 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $440,231 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSoutheastern Guide Dogs Inc: $423,265 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetBISHOP MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND NATURE INC: $361,082 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetAMVETS NATIONAL SERVICE FOUNDATION: $295,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetHOLD YOUR HORSES: $200,893 over 9y, 9.7% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $160,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAnimal Humane Society: $157,898 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetDouglas Animal Welfare Group: $103,595 over 7y, 11% of budgetValley Outreach: $98,224 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetMOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC: $71,234 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTahoe Youth and Family Services: $32,852 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetANNA MARIA ISLAND COMMUNITY CENTER: $30,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetPEOPLE REACHING OUT TO OTHER PEOPLE INC: $24,205 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY LIBRARY: $16,028 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWESTERN COMMUNITIES ACTION NETWORK INC: $14,913 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetDouglas County Sheriffs Advisory Council: $13,014 over 1y, 12% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TIDEWELL HOSPICE INC ↗
  • Who funds Community Coalition on Homelessness dba Turning Points ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc ↗
  • Who funds BISHOP MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND NATURE INC ↗
  • Who funds AMVETS NATIONAL SERVICE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOLD YOUR HORSES ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds Animal Humane Society ↗
  • Who funds Douglas Animal Welfare Group ↗
  • Who funds Valley Outreach ↗
  • Who funds MOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC ↗
  • Who funds Tahoe Youth and Family Services ↗
  • Who funds ANNA MARIA ISLAND COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE REACHING OUT TO OTHER PEOPLE INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN COMMUNITIES ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds Douglas County Sheriffs Advisory Council ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Sarasota Co IncFL13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Sarasota Co Inc · Xcel Energy Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ralph S French Charitable funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ralph S French Charitable. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Mote Marine Laboratory Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Bishop Museum of Science and Nature Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Tidewell Hospice Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ralph S French Charitable?

Find your warmest path to Ralph S French Charitable through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ralph S French’s filings →

More from the funding graph