Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ralph and Linda Aldrich Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$63k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$24k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Religion$210kHealth$114kInternational$9kHousing & Shelter$4kHuman Services$3kCommunity Improvement$3kYouth Development$1kPublic Safety & Disaster$500Other$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $34k
$1,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$89k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Harvest Church$24,000
Assure Womens Center$10,000
Step Up To Life$9,000
Vital Signs Ministry$6,000
Samaritans Purse$4,000
Christ for the City International$4,000
Waypoint Church$1,500
Fresh Start for All Nations$1,500
The Salvation Army$500
Abide$500
American Red Cross$500
Touch The Nations$500
The HOPE Center for Kids$300
The Navigators$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%American Red Cross: $500 → 14%American Red Cross: $500 → 14%Open Door Mission: $750 → 12%Open Door Mission: $700 → 12%Open Door Mission: $650 → 12%Open Door Mission: $800 → 12%Open Door Mission: $800 → 12%Open Door Mission: $550 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$383k · 18 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
4

Total granted

$383k
$18k

Still filing today

61%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyCivil RightsYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AW
    Assure Womens Center
    4× · 2019–2025 · $124k · revenue +83%
  • VS
    VITAL SIGNS MINISTRIES
    2× · 2020–2024 · $11k · revenue +23%
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $11k · revenue +151%

Funded once

  • AW
    Assure Women Ministries
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • SU
    Step Up to Life Ministry
    one grant, 2020 · $8k
  • BF
    BETHANY FELLOWSHIP INC
    one grant, 2019 · $250
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Message to All Nations Man

To reach out with the message of the gospel of jesus to the last, least, and the lost

Human Services
2
United Saints Worldwide

United Saints is committed to taking the Gospel to both major cities and the most remote regionsreaching places like the Amazon Jungle and beyondwith the power and love of Jesus.

Religion
3
Free to Worship Ministries

This church will be that place of emergency where people can come any time of day or night. We will be a place that will lead people back to health both spiritually and naturally.

Religion
4
Dozen Ministries

Religious

Religion
5
Wounded Spirits Ministries

The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…

Recreation & Sports
6
American Bible Society

Since 1816, american bible society has been fulfilling its mission of making the bible available to every person in a language and format each can understand and afford so all people may experience its life-changing message.

Religion
7
Reaching Out to the Nations Inc

Reaching Out To The Nations' mission is to both preach and demonstrate the love of Go through its projects and programs which include preaching, food distribution, widow and orphan assistance and leadership training.

Religion
8
Todd Worldwide Ministries
Housing & Shelter
9
International Needs

International needs has the vision to transform lives and change communities by helping christian nationals serve both god and neighbor within their own countries.

—
10
Intimate Life Ministries
—
11
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
12
Journey to Destiny Ministries

Journey To Destiny Ministries (JTDM) is a global, faith-based nonprofit organization committed to transforming and restoring dignity, hope, and opportunity to vulnerable individualsespecially children, women, and families affected by…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fresh Start for All Nations; the most unlike its peers is Touch the Nations. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Harvest Church: $162,000 · OtherHarvest ChurchAssure Womens Ministries: $16,000 · OtherAssure Womens MinistriesAssure Women Ministries: $10,000 · OtherCHRIST FOR THE CITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $9,000 · Other+9 more: $30,400 · Other+9 moreAssure Womens Center: $123,753 · HealthAssure Womens CenterStep Up To Life: $16,500 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $10,950 · ReligionCornerstone International Inc: $2,000 · ReligionVITAL SIGNS MINISTRIES: $11,000 · Civil RightsFRESH START FOR ALL NATIONS: $5,900 · PhilanthropyOPEN DOOR MISSION D/B/A OPEN DOOR MISSION & LYDIA HOUSE: $4,250 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,000 · Human ServicesTouch the Nations: $1,900 · InternationalHOPE CENTER FOR KIDS INC: $1,750 · Youth Development
Other$227,400Health$123,753Religion$29,450Civil Rights$11,000Philanthropy$5,900Human Services$5,250International$1,900Youth Development$1,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAssure Womens Center: $123,753 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetStep Up To Life: $16,500 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetVITAL SIGNS MINISTRIES: $11,000 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $10,950 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFRESH START FOR ALL NATIONS: $5,900 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetOPEN DOOR MISSION D/B/A OPEN DOOR MISSION & LYDIA HOUSE: $4,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetABIDE NETWORK INC: $3,150 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCornerstone International Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTouch the Nations: $1,900 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetHOPE CENTER FOR KIDS INC: $1,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Assure Womens Center ↗
  • Who funds Step Up To Life ↗
  • Who funds VITAL SIGNS MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds FRESH START FOR ALL NATIONS ↗
  • Who funds OPEN DOOR MISSION D/B/A OPEN DOOR MISSION & LYDIA HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds ABIDE NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds Cornerstone International Inc ↗
  • Who funds Touch the Nations ↗
  • Who funds HOPE CENTER FOR KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationKS12.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ralph and Linda Aldrich Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ralph and Linda Aldrich Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ralph and Linda Aldrich Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Ralph and Linda Aldrich Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ralph and Linda Aldrich’s filings →

    More from the funding graph