Skip to content

· Private foundation

Raith Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$561k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$561k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$939kHuman Services$876kPhilanthropy$611kReligion$90kEducation$50kInternational$35kFood & Nutrition$33kHousing & Shelter$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$560,713
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN CO$560,713
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $305k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 43% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%RIVER CENTER OF NEW CASTLE INC: $20k → 8%RIVER CENTER OF NEW CASTLE INC: $10k → 8%RIVER CENTER OF NEW CASTLE INC: $10k → 8%CATHOLIC CHARITIES - WELD COUNTY: $50k → 9%THE MATTHEWS HOUSE: $30k → 11%RIVER CENTER OF NEW CASTLE INC: $10k → 8%CATHOLIC CHARITIES - WELD COUNTY: $50k → 9%RIVER CENTER OF NEW CASTLE INC: $10k → 8%RIVER CENTER OF NEW CASTLE INC: $10k → 8%RIVER CENTER OF NEW CASTLE INC: $5k → 8%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF DENVER: $100k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.5M · 17 repeat orgs$144k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +100% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
9

Total granted

$2.5M
$144k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+100%
+6%

Still filing today

65%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionReligionEducationYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BN
    BARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $535k · revenue +100%
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES & COMMUNITY SERV OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER
    3× · 2020–2022 · $200k · revenue +27%
  • TR
    THE RESOURCE CENTER FOR PREGNANCY & PERSONAL HEALTH
    4× · 2018–2022 · $145k · revenue +54%

Funded once

  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
  • TM
    THE MATTHEWS HOUSEgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $30k · revenue +41%
  • WF
    WELD FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +6%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dream Centers of Colorado Springs

Dream centers serves vulnerable women and children who have nowhere else to turn. dream centers programs help those trapped in cycles of poverty to find hope, empbrace health, and build sustainable lives for themselves and their children.

Health
2
Catholic Charities Diocese of Gary

Catholic charities provides and advocates for the physical, emotional, and social needs of the poor and vulnerable. we focus our attention on people (individuals and families) who live in poverty and are marginalized in other ways. our…

Human Services
3
Christian Center of Park City

The christian center of park city (ccpc) is a christian, humanitarian community resource center that helps improve the lives of people and communities through meeting immediate and basic needs, serving as a leading networker of community…

Religion
4
Alternatives Pregnancy Center Inc

Alternatives Pregnancy Center exists to care for Denver-area women and men in pregnancy-related crisis and offer them meaningful alternatives to abortion. We seek to meet emotional, physical, and spriritual needs, enabling and encouraging…

Health
5
Life Choice Center

To provide christian based outreach to clients by providing services and information free of charge to anyone in a crisis pregnancy situation, with the goal of assisting the client to carry the pregnancy to term and with continued care…

Health
6
Cathedral Center Inc

Cathedral center's mission is to provide a safe environment for women and families, while working to end homelessness one life at a time. the cathedral center serves unaccompanied women and families with children who are homeless or…

Religion
7
Community Hospital of San Bernardino

Community hospital of san bernardino ("chsb") is a non-profit, full-service, acute care facility in business to provide acute inpatient care, long-term care and a wide range of ancillary and therapeutic care to the community we serve. our…

Health
8
The Human Choice of Iowa

Mission is to provide women facing an unplanned pregnancy with truthful medical information and education. we are faith-based with a mission to encourage, through education and outreach, the recognition of human life from the moment of…

Human Services
9
Heart Mountain Crisis Pregnancy Center Inc

The organization was created to glorify god by serving his people, especially those facing unplanned pregnancies. this includes rendering christian service, material aid, medical services and spiritual direction to women and men faced with…

Human Services
10
Womens Resource Medical Centers

Women's resource medical centers of southern nevada (wrmcsn) is a community-based, faith-driven not for profit 501 (c) 3 organization that exists to support pregnant women with medical care and resources to ensure healthy and thriving…

Health
11
Colorado Christian Services

Colorado christian services comes alongside women in unplanned pregnancies and christian adoptive couples, in building families through caring, experienced and professional adoption planning services. in addition, our community resource…

Human Services
12
Amnion Women's Center

Amnion's mission is to share the gospel of jesus christ and to protect and advocate for the sanctity of all human life, born and unborn, through the provision of abortion alternative services that empower mothers to choose life.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities & Community Serv of the Archdiocese of Denver; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
14/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN CO: $640,713 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN CORONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES: $310,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIESTriangle Cross Ranch Inc: $135,000 · OtherTriangle Cross Ranch IncPROJECT SELF SUFFCIENCY: $52,500 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES: $50,000 · OtherPENINSULA COMMUNITY CHURCH: $50,000 · Other+4 more: $45,000 · OtherBARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $535,000 · HealthBARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATIONTHE RESOURCE CENTER FOR PREGNANCY & PERSONAL HEALTH: $145,000 · HealthTHE RESOURCE CENTER FOR PREGNANCY & P…AEROANGEL INC: $110,000 · HealthAEROANGEL INCCHRIST CLINIC INC: $75,000 · HealthCHRIST CLINIC INC+1 more: $21,000 · HealthCATHOLIC CHARITIES & COMMUNITY SERV OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER: $200,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARIT…River Center of New Castle Inc: $75,000 · Human ServicesRiver Center of…A WOMAN'S PLACE INCORPORATED: $50,000 · Human ServicesA WOMAN'S PLACE…THE MATTHEWS HOUSE: $30,000 · Human ServicesTHE MATTHEWS HO…+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $35,000 · ReligionDIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX: $30,000 · ReligionThe Success Foundation Serving Greeley-Evans Schools Inc: $50,000 · EducationWELD FOOD BANK: $25,000 · Food & NutritionST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $7,500 · Food & NutritionHOPE HOUSE NORTHERN COLORADO: $5,000 · Youth Development
Other$1,283,213Health$886,000Human Services$356,000Religion$65,000Education$50,000Food & Nutrition$32,500Youth Development$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $535,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES & COMMUNITY SERV OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER: $200,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE RESOURCE CENTER FOR PREGNANCY & PERSONAL HEALTH: $145,000 over 4y, 6.0% of budgetTriangle Cross Ranch Inc: $135,000 over 4y, 14% of budgetAEROANGEL INC: $110,000 over 4y, 9.7% of budgetCHRIST CLINIC INC: $75,000 over 3y, 44% of budgetRiver Center of New Castle Inc: $75,000 over 7y, 6.7% of budgetThe Success Foundation Serving Greeley-Evans Schools Inc: $50,000 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetA WOMAN'S PLACE INCORPORATED: $50,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $35,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX: $30,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MATTHEWS HOUSE: $30,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetWELD FOOD BANK: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $21,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE HOUSE NORTHERN COLORADO: $5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetWOMEN TO WOMEN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES & COMMUNITY SERV OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER ↗
  • Who funds THE RESOURCE CENTER FOR PREGNANCY & PERSONAL HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds Triangle Cross Ranch Inc ↗
  • Who funds AEROANGEL INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRIST CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds River Center of New Castle Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Success Foundation Serving Greeley-Evans Schools Inc ↗
  • Who funds A WOMAN'S PLACE INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds DIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX ↗
  • Who funds THE MATTHEWS HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds WELD FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds HOPE HOUSE NORTHERN COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN TO WOMEN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO22.7× affinity9 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Weld Trust · Otter Cares Foundation AKA OTTERCARES FOUNDATION · United Way of Weld County Inc · Weld Community Foundation · Community Foundation of Northern Colorado · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Raith Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Raith Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Raith Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph