Skip to content
Raisedby US Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Raisedby US Inc

Raised by us unlocks the collective power of the workplace to do good.

$302k
Granted FY2021
8
Grants FY2021
6
States reached
$64k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2021.

Civil Rights$134kCommunity Improvement$102kPublic Benefit$69kHuman Services$67kEducation$64kCrime & Legal$64kHealth$36kHousing & Shelter$34kOther$0
02FY2021 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $285,782, the rows itemized in this filing. The $302,071 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $16,289 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k3 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $252k
$62,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$233k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CODE$63,630
THE BAIL PROJECT INC$63,500
NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD FOUNDATION$62,500
NATIONAL URBAN LEAG$62,500
NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS ATLANTA$11,429
ADVANC EMENT PROJECT$8,619
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF CLEVELAND$6,836
CENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY$6,768
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $88k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NATIONAL URBAN LEAG: $63k → 17%SOUTHEAST ASIAN MAA COALITION: $25k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
CA
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey

United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…

Philanthropy
2
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
3
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
4
Housing Partnership Development Corporation

Housing partnership development corporation functions to provide available low and moderate cost housing in the new york metro area through new housing production, preservation, rehabilitation, as well as the revitalization and…

Housing & Shelter
5
Urban League of Greater Philadelphia

The mission of the urban league is to empower disadvantaged, underresourced and marginalized communities to secure economic self-reliance, parity, power and civil rights.

—
6
Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments

Create a more accessible, sustainable, prosperous and livable national capital region by being a discussion forum, expert resource, issue advocate, and catalyst for action.

Public Benefit
7
Common Impact Inc

Common impact's mission is to strengthen the capacity of social change organizations, enabling them to better run and scale their programs. through its partnership with companies, common impact taps into the business skills and expertise…

Unclassified
8
Chicago United for Equity

Connecting and amplifying the power of individuals to build a just, equitable, and inclusive city.

Civil Rights
9
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
10
Council for Court Excellence

Council for court excellence's (cce's) mission is to bring people together to conduct research, educate, and advocate to make d.c.'s unique legal systems more just, equitable, and accountable to the community.

—
11
Urban Revival Inc

Ethnic/racial harmony through affordable housing & economic development.

—
12
Democracy Works Inc

The organization's mission is to leverage web-technologies to improve civic engagement and voter education.

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Citizens Committee for New York City Inc; the most unlike its peers is National Foundation for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/24
Grantees still filing
14/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD INC: $62,500 · OtherNATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD INCURBAN AFFAIRS COALITION: $29,205 · OtherURBAN AFFAIRS COALITIONPITTSBURGH COALITION FOR DYNAMIC PSYCHOTHERAPY INC: $25,000 · OtherPITTSBURGH COALITION FOR DYNAMIC PSYCHOT…Individual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientEmgage Foundation Inc: $15,000 · OtherEmgage Foundation IncGround Game Fund: $10,000 · OtherCATALYST CALIFORNIA: $8,619 · OtherPOWER INTERFAITH INC: $10,000 · OtherNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC: $11,429 · OtherCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $11,100 · Other+4 more: $26,729 · Other+4 moreSoul Food Community Development Corporation Inc: $57,200 · Housing & ShelterSoul Food Commun…WOMEN'S COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION PROJECT: $17,430 · Housing & ShelterWOMEN'S COMMUNIT…Humble Design Inc: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterHumble Design In…COMPASS HOUSING ALLIANCE: $6,500 · Housing & ShelterCOMPASS HOUSING …CODEORG: $63,630 · EducationCODEORGSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $17,146 · EducationSOCIAL GOOD FUND…YEAR UP INC: $10,000 · EducationYEAR UP INCNATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $62,500 · Human ServicesNATIONAL URBAN …SOUTHEAST ASIAN MUTUAL ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATIONS COALITION INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesSOUTHEAST ASIAN…THE BAIL PROJECT INC: $63,500 · Crime & LegalTHE BAIL PR…THE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER: $44,000 · Civil RightsTHE CENTER FOR WORKING FAMILIES INC: $35,000 · Employment
Other$229,582Housing & Shelter$91,130Education$90,776Human Services$87,500Crime & Legal$63,500Civil Rights$44,000Employment$35,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCODEORG: $63,630 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BAIL PROJECT INC: $63,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $62,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD INC: $62,500 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetSoul Food Community Development Corporation Inc: $57,200 over 1y, 33% of budgetTHE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER: $44,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetURBAN AFFAIRS COALITION: $29,205 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHEAST ASIAN MUTUAL ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATIONS COALITION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWOMEN'S COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION PROJECT: $17,430 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $17,146 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEmgage Foundation Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC: $11,429 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $11,100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHumble Design Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPOWER INTERFAITH INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGround Game Fund: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYEAR UP INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATALYST CALIFORNIA: $8,619 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRIVERSIDE PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF NORTHEAST OHIO INC: $6,836 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC: $6,768 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPASS HOUSING ALLIANCE: $6,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCITIZENS COMMITTEE FOR NEW YORK CITY INC: $5,625 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropi…Local Initiatives Sup…The Pfizer Foundation…Vanguard Charitable E…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
National Philanthropic TrustPA11.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Local Initiatives Support Corporation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Raisedby US Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Raisedby US Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Year Up Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Raisedby US Inc?

Find your warmest path to Raisedby US Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Raisedby US’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home