Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Jalil Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$57k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$26k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Religion$109kCivil Rights$76kHealth$48kInternational$48kArts & Culture$25kEducation$22kHuman Services$10kRecreation & Sports$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
$1,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF INDUS HOSPITAL INC USA$26,000
SHAHID AFRIDI FOUNDATION$14,000
DEVELOPMENTS IN LITERACY$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK$5,000
CAIR FOUNDATION$1,000
IQRA FOUNDATION$1,000
EVERGREEN ISLAMIC CENTER$1,000
ACF ANIMAL RESCUE USA$1,000
SOUTH BAY ISLAMIC ASSOCIATION$1,000
ISLAMIC RELIEF USA$875
SYRIAN AMERICAN MEDICAL SOCIETY$500
NORCAL SPINAL CORD INJURY FOUNDATIO$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CARING HANDS FOUNDATION: $9k → 8%FOOD JOY AND TOYS: $1k → 8%NORCAL SPINAL CORD INJURY FOUNDATIO: $250 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
OH
NJ
CA
VA
MD
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$269k · 21 repeat orgs$94k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
23

Total granted

$269k
$88k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+12%

Still filing today

48%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalArts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesCivil RightsEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FRIENDS OF INDUS HOSPITAL INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $33k · revenue +378%
  • DI
    DEVELOPMENTS IN LITERACY INC
    5× · 2018–2024 · $14k · revenue +24%
  • TH
    THE HARKER SCHOOL
    5× · 2018–2022 · $8k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • CS
    COMMON SENSE MEDIA
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +12%
  • AS
    ABDUL SATTAR EDHI INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -41%
  • HA
    HELP AID AFRICA
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -87%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fajr Scientific

To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.

Science & Tech
2
Ummah Relief International

Ummah relief international is a dedicated grassroots relief organization providing humanitarian services to bring help and hope to thousands of victims of natural and human disasters with quick and targeted action.

International
3
Muslim Aid America

Provide help to people who are victims of natural disasters or conflicts or suffering from poverty, hunger, disease, illiteracy, discrimination, homelessness, debt, unemployment, injustice, or lack of skills or economic opportunity.

Public Safety & Disaster
4
American Islamic Congress Inc

Established to represent the american muslim community and to advocate for human rights, tolerance, and justice in the united state and the world, and to foster interfaith and interethnic understanding.

5
Alight

Alight builds a meaningful life for and with the displaced. not simply addressing basic needs, but building a life filled with joy, dignity, connection, and purpose. we walk with them along their entire journey of displacement and deliver…

International
6
Al Ansaar Foundation for Humanity
Philanthropy
7
Kinder Relief Inc

Medical evacuation of critically-ill and injured children from conflict zones, provision of humanitarian assistance on the ground during armed conflicts, delivering life-saving medical supplies and emergency aid,offering comprehensive…

International
8
Aid for Starving Children

Aid For Starving Children provides assistance around the world to children and their families by providing food, shelter, clean water, financial assistance, education, and emergency relief to victims of famine, natural disasters, and war.

International
9
California Immigrant Policy Center

The california immigrant policy center upholds the humanity of immigrant communities in california by transforming systems to achieve racial, social, and economic justice.

Civil Rights
10
The American India Foundation

The american india foundation(aif) is a nonprofit american development organization that is devoted to accelerating social and economic change in india.

Public Safety & Disaster
11
Akshaya Patra Foundation (Usa)

The mission of the foundation is to simultaneously address childhood hunger and malnutrition and to promote education for children throughout india.

Food & Nutrition
12
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Help Aid Africa and the most unlike its peers is Asian Cine-Vision Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Health CentersAnimal Rescue and AdoptionCancer Support OrganizationsIndependent K-8 SchoolsMuslim Community Organizati…South Asian Cultural and Sp…Christian Missionary Organi…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%4%<5yr15%12%5–10yr20%31%10–20yr17%31%20–35yr11%19%35–55yr13%4%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%1%<5yr15%2%5–10yr20%46%10–20yr17%36%20–35yr11%16%35–55yr13%1%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/27
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,951

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
15/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

KOSHISH — $80,000 · OtherKOSHISHAMERICAN MUSLIM COMMUNITY FUND — $65,505 · OtherAMERICAN MUSLIM COMMUNITY FUNDSHAHID AFRIDI FOUNDATION — $15,500 · OtherSHAHID AFRIDI FOUNDATIONCHILDLIFE FOUNDATION PAKISTAN-HO — $15,000 · OtherCHILDLIFE FOUNDATION PAKISTAN-HO+25 more — $54,700 · Other+25 moreFRIENDS OF INDUS HOSPITAL INC — $33,000 · HealthFRIENDS OF…+2 more — $1,100 · HealthCOMMON SENSE MEDIA — $20,000 · Arts & CultureCOMMON SEN…COUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC RELATIONS CALIFORNIA — $7,500 · Arts & CultureCOUNCIL ON…ASIAN CINE-VISION INC — $5,000 · Arts & CultureASIAN CINE…ABDUL SATTAR EDHI INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · InternationalHELP AID AFRICA — $10,000 · InternationalISLAMIC RELIEF USA — $2,295 · International+3 more — $1,800 · InternationalDEVELOPMENTS IN LITERACY INC — $14,000 · EducationTHE HARKER SCHOOL — $7,900 · EducationCARING HANDS FOUNDATION INC — $9,000 · Human ServicesFOOD JOY AND TOYS — $1,000 · Human Services+1 more — $250 · Human ServicesCHILDLIFE FOUNDATION AMERICA I — $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$230,705Health$34,100Arts & Culture$32,500International$24,095Education$21,900Human Services$10,250Philanthropy$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFRIENDS OF INDUS HOSPITAL INC — $33,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMON SENSE MEDIA — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDEVELOPMENTS IN LITERACY INC — $14,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetABDUL SATTAR EDHI INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHELP AID AFRICA — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDLIFE FOUNDATION AMERICA I — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE HARKER SCHOOL — $7,900 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC RELATIONS CALIFORNIA — $7,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetASIAN CINE-VISION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetISLAMIC RELIEF USA — $2,295 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSETI INSTITUTE — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAIR-FOUNDATION INC — $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetACF ANIMAL RESCUE USA — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFOOD JOY AND TOYS — $1,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetMUSLIM ADVOCATES — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSYRIAN AMERICAN MEDICAL SOCIETY — $800 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGivelight Foundation Inc — $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNORCAL SPINAL CORD INJURY FOUNDATION — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRIENDS OF INDUS HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds COMMON SENSE MEDIA
  • Who funds DEVELOPMENTS IN LITERACY INC
  • Who funds ABDUL SATTAR EDHI INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds HELP AID AFRICA
  • Who funds CHILDLIFE FOUNDATION AMERICA I
  • Who funds CARING HANDS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds THE HARKER SCHOOL
  • Who funds COUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC RELATIONS CALIFORNIA
  • Who funds ASIAN CINE-VISION INC
  • Who funds ISLAMIC RELIEF USA
  • Who funds SETI INSTITUTE
  • Who funds CAIR-FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds ACF ANIMAL RESCUE USA
  • Who funds FOOD JOY AND TOYS
  • Who funds MUSLIM ADVOCATES
  • Who funds SYRIAN AMERICAN MEDICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC
  • Who funds Givelight Foundation Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Muslim Community FoundationCA26.1× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Muslim Community Foundation · Raghib Family Foundation · Good Planet Foundation · Bright Funds Foundation · United Way Worldwide · Zakia and Mian Family Charitable Foundation Inc · Daffy Charitable Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · AbbVie Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jalil Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph