Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Yaqub Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$354k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Health$1.5MInternational$1.4MReligion$1.1MEducation$575kHuman Services$47kCommunity Improvement$30kHousing & Shelter$28kFood & Nutrition$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $156k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $175k
$10,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE CENTER FOR ISLAMIC TEACHINGS AND COMMUNITY DEV$75,000
INFECTION PREVENTION AND CONTROL FOUNDATION$50,000
DEVELOPMENTS IN LITERACY INC$50,000
FAMILY EDUCATION SERVICES FOUNDATION NORTH AMERICA$25,000
AKHUWAT USA$25,000
ISLAMIC FOUNDATION$20,000
DAR US SAKINA$16,000
OBAT HELPERS INC$10,000
BLESSING FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL INC$10,000
CHILDLIFE FOUNDATION AMERICA INC$10,000
ISLAMIC FOUNDATION$10,000
BAITUSSALAM USA$10,000
CHARITY WAY FOUNDATION$10,000
BLESSING FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL INC$10,000
DARUSSALAM FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $341k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HELPING HAND FOR RELIEF & DEVELOPMENT INC: $10k → 8%MORNINGSTAR CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $10k → 14%CHRISTIAN WOMENS CENTER: $1k → 19%HELPING HAND FOR RELIEF & DEVELOPMENT INC: $5k → 8%HELPING HAND FOR RELIEF & DEVELOPMENT INC: $1k → 8%THE CITIZENS FOUNDATION USA: $50k → 16%CHI-CARE: $1k → 14%THE CITIZENS FOUNDATION USA: $20k → 16%CHI-CARE: $1k → 14%THE CITIZENS FOUNDATION USA: $100k → 14%THE CITIZENS FOUNDATION USA: $71k → 14%THE CITIZENS FOUNDATION USA: $20k → 14%CHI-CARE: $20k → 7%CHI-CARE: $4k → 7%CHI-CARE: $2k → 7%WORLD MEMON ORGANIZATION OF NORTH AMERICA: $10k → 7%WORLD MEMON ORGANIZATION OF NORTH AMERICA: $10k → 7%WORLD MEMON ORGANIZATION OF NORTH AMERICA: $5k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
IN
NJ
CT
CA
VA
MD
AZ
OK
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 13% of Yaqub Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Yaqub Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 13% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.9M · 33 repeat orgs$375k to everyone else

33 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
28

Total granted

$3.9M
$330k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+41%

Still filing today

85%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OH
    OBAT HELPERS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $410k · revenue +53%
  • THE CITIZENS FOUNDATION USA
    5× · 2017–2023 · $301k · revenue +156%
  • FRIENDS OF INDUS HOSPITAL INC
    5× · 2017–2024 · $275k · revenue +378%

Funded once

  • ZA
    ZAFAR AND ATIA INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2023 · $200k · 65% of their budget
  • HA
    HUMANITY AUXILIUM INC
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue 0%
  • SA
    SUDANESE AMERICAN CHARITY OF ILLINOIS
    one grant, 2021 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rehmat Foundation
Philanthropy
2
Association of Pakistani Women in America Inc

Help disabled women and children in pakistan

International
3
The Noor Foundation
Philanthropy
4
Shakir Charitable Trust
Philanthropy
5
Bangladesh American Society of Muslim Aid for Huma
Philanthropy
6
International Institute of Islamic Thought the Fairfax Institute
Education
7
International Institute of Islamic Medicine

International Institute of Islamic Medicine (IIIM) acquires and disseminates knowledge of the rich history of Islamic medicine and fosters its contemporary application

Human Services
8
Al Ansaar Foundation for Humanity
Philanthropy
9
Afghan Women & Children Health & Education Foundation

Our mission is to improve the quality of life for Afghan women and children by providing free health services, social services and education to the most vulnerable in Afghanistan.

International
10
Allah Wale Trust Inc

To provide food and shelter to the poor people of pakistan

Food & Nutrition
11
Pakistan Children Relief

Pakistan Children Relief aims to provide a prosperous and bright future to young leaders of Pakistan by empowering them with quality education, healthy environment and basic needs

Education
12
Sanabil Foundation

Mission Touching real lives one person at a time Vision to uplift those who are little behind,everyone in this volunteer-led organization will invest in their short, and longer-term and communal needs by employing. contributions…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is I-Care Fund America Inc and the most unlike its peers is Kitcc Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 16 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%8%<5yr14%25%5–10yr19%26%10–20yr16%30%20–35yr13%7%35–55yr16%5%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%6%<5yr14%14%5–10yr19%32%10–20yr16%28%20–35yr13%20%35–55yr16%1%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/63
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,502

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

51 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 51 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
19
Early backer (in before they grew)
48/51
Grantees still filing
38/51
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

I-CARE FUND AMERICA INC — $455,000 · InternationalI-CARE FUND AMERICA INCOBAT HELPERS INC — $410,000 · InternationalOBAT HELPERS INCFAMILY EDUCATION SVCS FOUNDATION NORTH AMERICA INC — $225,000 · InternationalFAMILY EDUCATION SVCS FOUNDATION NORTH …ZAFAR AND ATIA INCORPORATED — $200,000 · InternationalZAFAR AND ATIA INCORPORATEDPAKISTANI DESCENT PHYSICIANS SOCIETY — $163,750 · InternationalPAKISTANI DESCENT PHYSICIANS SOCIETYCHARITY WAY FOUNDATION — $60,000 · International+11 more — $116,500 · International+11 moreISLAMIC FOUNDATION — $751,000 · OtherISLAMIC FOUNDATIONIMRAN KHAN CANCER APPEAL INC — $270,000 · OtherIMRAN KHAN CANCER APPEAL INCTHE CENTER FOR ISLAMIC TEACHINGS AND COMMUNITY DEV — $172,500 · OtherTHE CENTER FOR ISLAMIC TEACHINGS A…DARUSSALAM FOUNDATION — $160,000 · OtherDARUSSALAM FOUNDATION+17 more — $105,000 · Other+17 moreFRIENDS OF INDUS HOSPITAL INC — $275,000 · HealthFRIENDS OF INDU…Infection Prevention & Control Foundation — $236,000 · HealthInfection Preve…KITCC FOUNDATION — $85,000 · HealthKITCC FOUNDATIO…+6 more — $46,000 · Health+6 moreTHE CITIZENS FOUNDATION USA — $301,000 · Human ServicesTHE CITIZ…Chi-Care — $28,000 · Human ServicesChi-CareWORLD MEMON ORGANIZATION OF NORTH AMERICA — $25,000 · Human ServicesWORLD MEM…HELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC — $16,000 · Human Services+2 more — $11,000 · Human ServicesFORGING OPPORTUNITIES FOR REFUGEES IN AMERICA INC NFP — $130,000 · EducationDAR US SAKINA — $80,000 · EducationDEVELOPMENTS IN LITERACY INC — $75,000 · EducationNOOR FOUNDATION INC — $45,000 · EducationDeccan Alumni Association Of North America — $15,000 · Education+4 more — $24,000 · EducationCHILDLIFE FOUNDATION AMERICA I — $210,000 · PhilanthropyAKHUWAT USA — $25,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $2,500 · PhilanthropyICNA Chicago Illinois Organization — $5,000 · ReligionACADEMY OF ISLAMIC EDUCATION NFP — $4,500 · Religion
International$1,630,250Other$1,458,500Health$642,000Human Services$381,000Education$369,000Philanthropy$237,500Religion$9,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetI-CARE FUND AMERICA INC — $455,000 over 5y, 9.1% of budgetOBAT HELPERS INC — $410,000 over 9y, 4.6% of budgetTHE CITIZENS FOUNDATION USA — $301,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF INDUS HOSPITAL INC — $275,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetIMRAN KHAN CANCER APPEAL INC — $270,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetInfection Prevention & Control Foundation — $236,000 over 5y, 25% of budgetFAMILY EDUCATION SVCS FOUNDATION NORTH AMERICA INC — $225,000 over 5y, 41% of budgetCHILDLIFE FOUNDATION AMERICA I — $210,000 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetZAFAR AND ATIA INCORPORATED — $200,000 over 1y, 65% of budgetPAKISTANI DESCENT PHYSICIANS SOCIETY — $163,750 over 2y, 33% of budgetFORGING OPPORTUNITIES FOR REFUGEES IN AMERICA INC NFP — $130,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetKITCC FOUNDATION — $85,000 over 4y, 10% of budgetDAR US SAKINA — $80,000 over 5y, 4.6% of budgetDEVELOPMENTS IN LITERACY INC — $75,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetCHARITY WAY FOUNDATION — $60,000 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetNOOR FOUNDATION INC — $45,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetThe Human Development Foundation of North America — $36,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetChi-Care — $28,000 over 5y, 6.1% of budgetWORLD MEMON ORGANIZATION OF NORTH AMERICA — $25,000 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetHUMANITY AUXILIUM INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetHELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC — $16,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDeccan Alumni Association Of North America — $15,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetHUNAR FOUNDATION INCORPORATED — $15,000 over 2y, 6.5% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $12,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN MUSLIM PHYSICIAN OF INDIAN ORIGIN — $11,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetAGHOSH AL-KHIDMAT USA INCORPORATED — $10,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetMORNINGSTAR CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCANCER CARE HOSPITAL & RESEARC CENTER FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetInstitute of Infection Prevention and Control — $10,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetPENNY APPEAL USA INC — $9,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSONIA SHAH ORGANIZATION — $7,500 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetINNER-CITY MUSLIM ACTION NETWORK — $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFEED THE CHILDREN INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONE UMMAH FOUNDATION IN MEMORY OF MUSTAFA SAEED RAHMAN — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPRATHAM USA — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNIGERIAN ISLAMIC ASSOCIATION OF USA — $2,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMedGlobal Inc — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetISLAMIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA — $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHRISTIAN WOMENS CENTER — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAlliance for Global Justice Corp — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSULEMAN FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHeroic Hearts Organization NFP — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetASIAN AMERICAN CAUCUS EDUCATION FUND — $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY EDUCATION IN EXCELLENCE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEMPOWER SERENDIB — $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Muslim Commu…Islamic Food & Nutrit…Darul Sadaqa786Rauf & Azeem Foundati…Zakia and Mian Family…Council of Islamic Or…Muslim Community Cent…AbbVie FoundationKhalid E Parekh Found…Pirzada Family Founda…Baker Hughes Foundati…Shell USA Company Fou…
American Muslim Community FoundationCA29.7× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Muslim Community Foundation · Islamic Food & Nutrition Council of America · Darul Sadaqa786 · Rauf & Azeem Foundation Inc · Zakia and Mian Family Charitable Foundation Inc · Council of Islamic Organizations of Greater Chicago · Muslim Community Center · AbbVie Foundation · Khalid E Parekh Foundation Inc · Pirzada Family Foundation · Baker Hughes Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Yaqub Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 60%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
  • Feed the Children Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 67 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home